Electrum is a gold and silver alloy found in nature, with
traces of copper, platinum and other metals. Thus begins the story of this
very long and close relation between gold and silver. It is said that a
picture is worth a thousand words, so let us analyze this relation between
gold and silver with some graphs.
Graph #1 shows why gold, silver, platinum and palladium
are considered precious metals, by comparing them to other metals such as
copper and nickel. The abundance of non-precious metals is obvious.
Copper is 800 times more abundant than silver, which is the most abundant
precious metal.
Graph #1: Abundance of precious metals vs
non-precious metals in the Earth’s crust
If we take a closer look to precious metals in graph #2,
we observe that gold is rarer than platinum and that silver is the most
abundant one. The gold/silver ratio is 19/1, whereas the platinum/gold ratio
is 1.25/1. Even though platinum is 1.25 times more abundant than gold in the
Earth’s crust, 16 times more gold is extracted than platinum.
In regards to the relationship between gold and silver,
we observe great variations in the ratio. Even though there is 19 times more
silver than there is gold in the Earth’s crust, only 9 times more silver than
gold is extracted today. The historical 15/1 gold/silver ratio is closer to
their abundance ratio of 19/1. One must not forget, however, that the
historical 15/1 ratio has always been fixed or imposed by the state, one-way
or the other, and never by the markets.
Graph #2: Abundance of precious metals in the
Earth’s crust
Relative mass proportion ratio = 64/1
Abundance in weight ratio in the Earth’s crust = 19/1
Total supply ratio = 7/1
Mining only supply ratio = 9/1
Historical price ratio = 15/1
Actual price ratio = 62/1
Stock/flow ratio = 2/1
Let us take a closer look at the stock, supply and demand
factors for gold and silver, to see if they can justify the historical ratio
of 15/1 or the actual market ratio of 62/1. If we look at graphs #4 and #5,
we realize that the silver stock is twice the gold stock. However, it is
important to know that the silver stock is much harder to get back into the
market than gold’s, because it is not stored in its simplest form, contrary
to gold. A lot of silver is wasted.
If we study the gold and silver supply, we observe that
the total silver supply in relation to gold is 7/1, and the mining supply
ratio is 9/1. 60% of the gold market and 75% of the silver market are fed by
mining production.
50% of silver’s demand is industrial, whereas industrial
demand for gold represents only 10% of the market. It is important to know
that industrial demand consumes the metal and makes it hardly recoverable
and, consequently, costly in terms of time and money.
According to Ted Butler, silver market analyst, known
silver reserves have shrinked 95% since the end of World War II. This is due
to a persistent deficit between supply and demand that is continuing today.
This known deficit is remarkable, since there has been steady growth of
silver world production in the last 50 years, but not enough to satisfy
growing industrial demand.
Graph #3: Gold stock, supply and demand
Gold Stock
|
Graph #4: Silver stock, supply and demand
Silver Stock
|
Gold Supply
|
Silver Supply
|
Gold Demand
|
Silver Demand
|
Now, let us compare (graph #5) the stock/flow ratio of
the two precious metals. It is approximately 2/1 in relation to the total
market or the mining production. This means that the stock is twice as
menacing in the gold market than in silver’s and, once again, this stock is
much more liquid than silver’s. Moreover, the silver stock is quickly
dwindling, whereas gold’s is practically constant, or augments only slightly.
Graph #5: Gold/silver ratio of stock/flow (total and
mining production only)
Graph #6 shows us the gold/silver price ratio since 1260,
that is 750 years of history. We can see that the ratio has stayed almost
constant for about 600 years, around 15/1. This is because it has been fixed
by the state and not by the market. Since the moment when silver lost its
monetary aspect, it has become a simple commodity. On the other hand, gold
has remained a monetary metal, and its price has been officially fixed until
1971. Since gold and silver prices became free, we can observe that the ratio
started to fluctuate enormously, going from 10/1 to close to 100/1. However,
one must not neglect the fact that, even if the gold price is not fixed
officially anymore, it still is a monetary metal for central banks, whereas
they own almost no more silver. The relation between gold and silver changed
around 1876, when the bi-metallic standard ended. Silver then stopped to be a
medium of exchange, while gold remained the currency of last resort and a
store of value.
Graph #6: The gold/silver ratio
Since the gold price is no more fixed, the ratio has
fluctuated between 10 and 100, without indicating a trend or a cycle. This
can be explained, as far as I am concerned, by the fact, that the two metals
have different stock, supply and demand parameters that determine their
prices and one must, consequently, study them separately.
Graph #7: Spot gold vs spot silver ratio
However, there is one exception (see graph #8), because
there is a great correlation between the prices of gold and silver. It is the
highest correlation of any metals, and it has been 72% in the last five
years. This, I think, can be explained by the fact that we are in the midst
of a financial crisis and that a collapse of the present monetary system is
probable. This has caused a staggering rise in the price of gold that was
followed by a transfer of funds toward silver by those who couldn’t afford to
buy gold. This is the reason why silver is called ?poor man’s gold?. The
higher the gold price, the higher the correlation with silver.
Graph #8: Correlations (over five years) of weekly
returns in US dollars
Silver’s price never moves independently from gold,
despite its fundamentals. Silver’s monetary aspect dictates its price at this
moment. Silver investors are much the same as gold investors, in that they
focus mainly on the monetary aspect of silver, instead of its industrial
aspect. If gold ever makes a return in the international monetary system,
silver will be traded as a currency, though it will not, I believe, become
actual currency.
We must also observe, in graph #9, that silver is 10%
more volatile than gold. This is why Roy Jastram has nicknamed silver the
?restless? metal and gold the ?constant? metal.
Graph #9: Volatility (one year) of annualized daily
returns
Let us look now at how gold and silver behaved during the
last great speculative bubble in the precious metals, during the 1970-1980
period. We can see, in graphs #10 and #11, that the gains have been almost
similar for gold (2,382%) and silver (2,144%), but that the following plunge
has been steeper for silver. It is obvious that the precious metals bull
market that started in 2000 cannot yet be considered as a speculative bubble.
Since 2000, gold has gone up only by 395% and silver by 398%. I believe the
speculative phase hasn’t begun yet. I think it will begin only when gold will
have crossed the $2,000 mark, and then it will reach maybe a level of around
$5,000, whereas silver will probably reach $100.
Graph #10: Gold Bull Market – 1970 vs 2000
|
Graph #11: Silver Bull market – 1970 vs 2000
|
For the last five years, the annual return on silver has
outperformed the return on gold, but during the recent takedown (2013), its
price corrected more violently (graphs #12 and #13).
Graph #12: Annual returns over five years
Graph #13: Performance of precious metals over five years
As it can be seen in graph #14, gold outperforms silver
in disinflation/deflation periods.
Graph #14: Gold/silver ratio: Gold outperforms silver in
disinflation/deflation periods
The relation between gold and silver changed around 1876
when the bi-metallic standard ended and silver stopped being a medium of
exchange. However, it is obvious that the correlation between them is as
strong as it has ever been. One just needs to look at graph #15 to realize
that, even after the demonetization of gold in 1971, the correlation has
remained just as strong. However, it is the monetary crisis that gave gold
the leadership, and with silver following with much greater volatility.
Between 1969 and 1980, the correlation coefficient between the prices of gold
and silver was 0.9267. Between 2001 (when silver was at its lowest) and today
(2013), the correlation coefficient was 0.8106. Which means that almost 2/3
of the silver price moves in this secular bear market and 7/8 of its moves in
both bull markets since 1971 are due to the changes in gold’s price.
Graph #15: Gold vs silver and the 200-day moving average
deviations
Graph #16 represents several projections of gold and
silver prices with different gold/silver ratios going from 16/1 to 80/1. I
think there is no reason why the gold/silver ratio should come back to 15/1
or any other level. Both gold and silver have their own stock, supply and
demand characteristics, but there remains a very strong correlation between
them. The crisis in the international monetary system is going to push both
precious metals to much higher prices within five years. The gold/silver
ratio will perhaps decline in the coming years, but not by much (maybe 50/1),
and certainly not all the way to 15/1 or even 20/1. Such a ratio would have
to be mandated, as it has been the case for 600 years, but I doubt very much
that it would happen.
Graph #16: Potential prices at different gold/silver
ratios
Until the crisis in the international monetary system is
resolved, the monetary aspect of silver will dominate its industrial aspect,
and gold will keep its leadership role. As the silver price goes up, the more
the industrial demand will decline, while the monetary demand will rise. The
question is, in what proportions will this happen. Central banks and
sovereign funds will dominate the gold market, whereas private investors will
mainly dominate the silver market. There is no central bank that I know of
that is buying silver today for its monetary reserves. Gold remains mainly a
monetary metal, whereas silver has, above all, become an industrial metal
that, in a monetary crisis like todays, can play a monetary role, as ?poor
man’s gold?.
In conclusion, I think there is no worthy reason to
believe that the gold/silver ratio will come back to its historical level.
Gold and silver have their own markets; they sometimes converge and they
sometimes diverge, but there is always an important correlation between the
two.
Dan Popescu - Gold & Silver Analyst for
Goldbroker.com
Twitter: @PopescuCo
Goldbroker.com on Twitter and Facebook
Goldbroker.com all rights reserved