In my Fall 2010 Independent
Review article entitled “The Culture of Violence in the American West:
Myth versus Reality,” I noted the creepiness of the fact that General William
Tecumseh Sherman referred to the U.S. Army’s twenty-five year campaign of
genocide against the Plains Indians, which he was in charge of for the
duration, as “the final solution to the Indian problem” (Cited in Michael
Fellman, Citizen Sherman, p. 260). It is creepy
because it reminds one of Adolf Hitler’s “final solution” rhetoric. I
did not claim in my article that Hitler literally plagiarized General Sherman
or was even familiar with Sherman’s “final solution” rhetoric, but
scholarship that has been brought to my attention suggests that he may well
have been.
The scholarship is cited
in a June 18, 2013 article in the jewishjournal.com Web site by Lia
Mandelbaum entitled “Hitler’s Inspiration and Guide: The Native American
Holocaust.” Citing the books Adolf Hitler by John Toland and Hitler’s
Rise to Power by David A. Meier, Mandelbaum writes that “it shook me to
my core” when she “learned that the genocidal mentality and actions of the
U.S. policymakers [from 1862 to 1890] would find similar expression years
later when the Nazis, under Hitler, studied the plans of [“The Long Walk of
the Navajo”] to design the concentration camps for Jews.”
The “Long Walk of the
Navajo,” also known as the Bosque Redondo, was the January 1864 deportation
and ethnic cleansing of the Navajo Indians who were forced at gunpoint by the
U.S. Army to walk more than 300 miles from their ancestral lands in
northeastern Arizona and northwestern New Mexico to a concentration camp
known as Bosque Redondo in eastern New Mexico. This took place in the
dead of winter. Hundreds died along the way of the forced march,
including many women, children, and the elderly. In the succeeding four
years the U.S. Army would imprison almost 10,000 Navajo in concentration
camps where they lived “under armed guards, in holes in the ground, with
extremely scarce rations,” writes Mandelbaum. At least 3,500 of them
died in the camps.
In his book, Adolf Hitler (p. 202), John Toland wrote that
“Hitler’s concept of concentration camps as well as the practicality of
genocide owed much, so he claimed, to his studies of English and United
States history.” Hitler “admired the camps for Boer prisoners in South
Africa and for the Indians in the wild west; and often praised to his inner
circle the efficiency of America’s extermination – by starvation and even
combat – of the red savages who could not be tamed by captivity.”
Hitler was apparently
“very interested in the way the Indian population had rapidly declined due to
epidemics and starvation when the United States government forced them to
live on the reservations.” And the Nazis did force hundreds of
prisoners in their concentration camps on death marches where many of them
starved or froze to death.
Adolf Hitler was
infatuated in his youth with tales of the American West. “His favorite
game to play outside was cowboys and Indians,” wrote David A. Meier in Hitler’s
Rise to Power. He read 70 of novels about the American
West by the German author Karl May, who “had never been to America” and
“invented a hero named Old Shatterhand, a white man who always won his
battles with Native Americans.” Hitler “continued reading [May’s
novels] even as Fuhrer,” wrote Mandelbaum, even referring to the Russians as
“Redskins” during the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union and ordering his
military commanders to read May’s books.
The U.S. government’s war
of genocide against all the Plains Indians, not just the Navajo, would indeed
be a “good” example for any psychotic, murderous tyrant like Adolf
Hitler. It was prosecuted by all of Lincoln’s generals, including
Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, Custer, and various other “Civil War luminaries”
such as John Pope, O.O Howard, Nelson Miles, Alfred Terry, E.O.C. Ord, Edward
Canby, Benjamin Garrison, and Winfield Scott Hancock, wrote John Marszalek in
Sherman: A Soldier’s Passion for
Order (p.
380). Sherman and Sheridan adopted the motto, “The only good Indian is
a dead Indian” as their armies murdered at least 45,000 Indians from 1864 to
1890, including thousands of women and children (See Russell Thornton, American
Indian Holocaust and Survival). The survivors were placed in
concentration camps euphemistically called “reservations,” where many of
their descendants remain to this day.
Lincoln’s generals were
not shy about announcing their intentions to commit genocide. John Pope
announced that “It is my purpose to utterly exterminate the Sioux . . .
. They are to be treated as maniacs or wild beasts, and by no means as
people with whom treaties or compromises can be made” (David Nichols, Lincoln
and the Indians, p. 87). “All the Indians will have to be killed or
be maintained as a species of paupers,” General Sherman announced, calling
his policy “a racial cleansing of the land” (See Michael Fellman, Citizen Sherman, p. 264). “Sherman gave
[General Phil] Sheridan prior authorization to slaughter as many women and
children as well as men Sheridan or his subordinates felt was necessary when
they attacked Indian villages,” wrote Fellman (p. 271).
So it is not a stretch to believe that Adolf Hitler, who fancied himself
to be a serious student and admirer of U.S. military history from the Lincoln
regime to the end of the nineteenth century, would have been “inspired” by
Lincoln’s maniacal, murderous, genocidal generals like Grant, Sherman,
Sheridan, and Custer, as the historians John Toland and David A. Meier
maintain. Indeed, Hitler was a rabid admirer of Lincoln’s compulsion to
destroy state sovereignty and of the military tactics (i.e. waging total war
on civilians) that he employed to achieve it. On page 566 of the
1999 Mariner/Houghton Mifflin edition of Mein Kampf Hitler repeated
Lincoln’s historically false and absurd argument from his first inaugural
address that the states were never sovereign. “The individual
states of the American union . . . could not have possessed any state
sovereignty of their own,” wrote Hitler, paraphrasing Lincoln. He did
this to make his own case for the abolition of states’ rights or federalism
in Germany and the creation of a centralized, monopolistic state.
The arguments in favor of states’ rights that were being made in Germany,
wrote Hitler, were “propagated by the Jews” and should therefore be
dismissed. “The mischief of individual federated states . . . must
cease,” the dictator bellowed. “A rule basic for us National
Socialists,” Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, “is derived: A powerful
national Reich.” The only real difference between this statement and
Lincoln’s theory of the American union is that Hitler referred to a “national
Reich” whereas Lincoln, ever the master of slick political rhetoric, called
the same thing “the mystic chords of union.”