|
Here
is a fascinating video with Marc Faber, Nassim Taleb, Hugh Hendry and others
on February 5 in a group discussion Where is the Money in 2010 – What are
the Risks?
It's a long video, about an hour, but well worth a play. Be sure to click on
the lower right corner to play the video in English.
One widely quoted excerpt from the debate was the statement by Nassin Taleb: ‘Every
Human’ Should Short U.S. Treasuries.
Nassim
Nicholas Taleb, author of “The Black Swan,” said “every
single human being” should bet U.S. Treasury bonds will decline, citing
the policies of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and the Obama
administration.
It’s “a no brainer” to sell short Treasuries, Taleb, a
principal at Universa Investments LP in Santa Monica, California, said at a
conference in Moscow today. “Every single human being should have that
trade.”
Taleb said investors should bet on a rise in long-term U.S. Treasury yields,
which move inversely to prices, as long as Bernanke and White House economic
adviser Lawrence Summers are in office, without being more specific. Nouriel
Roubini, the New York University professor who predicted the credit crisis,
also said at the conference that the U.S. dollar will weaken against Asian
and “commodity” currencies such as the Brazilian real over the
next two or three years.
No White Swans?
The ultimate irony in Taleb's suggestion is that his book rails against the
hubris of predictions and models, instead speaks of the "impact of the
highly improbable". In his book and at the conference, Taleb encourages
people to bet on the highly improbable because in his view the highly
improbable happens far more often than anyone thinks.
He recommends one-way bets on hyper-inflation, not just inflation. I have a
question: Why is "swan theory" so one sided? Is a further
deflationary collapse impossible?
By telling “every single human being” that betting against
treasuries is the right thing to do, Taleb is effectively predicting a 100%
certainty "there are no white swans".
Finally, Taleb suggests playing it safe with 80% of one capital and rolling
the dice on long shots with the other 20. However, at 20% a crack, if the
bets do not come in, one is going to quickly run out of funds.
I believe Hugh Hendry got the better of this debate on a number of issues.
Hendry was the sole panel member taking the deflation side of the bet and the
sole panel member not bullish on China.
Mish
GlobalEconomicAnalysis.blogspot.com
To
sign up for a free copy of Sitka’s Monthly Client Newsletter,
please register your email address at the bottom of the Sitka Pacific Commentary Page.
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Thoughts
on the great inflation/deflation/stagflation debate as well as discussions on
gold, silver, currencies, interest rates, and policy decisions that affect
the global markets.
|
|