|
If this risks
sounding metaphysical, so it should...
SO a DOLLAR is
still a Dollar, just as Richard Nixon told US citizens it was 40 years ago
this summer.
Whether the Euro will be worth anything next week,
who can say? But since then, 15 August 1971, that's all the Dollar has been
– one dollar alone, rather than a quantity of rare, indestructible gold
bullion, that "barbarous
relic" of pre-Industrial superstition, and beloved of the 21st
century's fastest-growing, wealth-accumulating societies today.
Does it matter? The day before President Nixon's
announcement, only a foreign central banker could have exchanged dollars for
metal, demanding gold bullion from the US Treasury's hoard with a fistful of
what were in effect receipts. (The citizen's right to swap the Dollar for
gold had gone four decades sooner, along with that freedom to own or trade
bullion finally revived under Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford, on 31 December
1974.) But now the token replaced the metal entirely, and the Dollar became
the thing in itself. Instead of representing a deeper,
apparently "truer" money in underground vaults, the Dollar was all.
If this risks sounding metaphysical, so it should.
"By nature, my friend, man's mind dwells in philosophy," as Plato
wrote 2,400 years ago, and money is no mere idea within our thinking. It's
part of the fabric, the alphabet of how we conceive of the world, second only
– if that – to language.
Imagine there's no money? A world without money is
literally unthinkable, never mind easy. Yet here we are, barely discussing
– outside a handful of websites and chatrooms
– how the basis of money has utterly changed inside one lifetime.
Yes, under the post-war Bretton Woods system, the
almighty Dollar already underpinned the rest of the world's currencies
– the Deutsch Mark, Yen, Franc, Peso, Lira and the rest. But until
1971, that underlying asset was merely a staging post between all those
monetary units and what was still deemed the real stuff, gold bullion.
Swapping, say, Sterling for Dollars, and then Dollars for gold, a central
bank could in effect redeem British Pounds for US gold bullion (an ever-more
attractive play during the prolonged collapse of Britain's international
credit). Closing the gold window at the New York Fed, Nixon put in train that
"eliminat[ion]
of gold as the common denominator
" of money worldwide announced seven years
later by the IMF. And without rare, tightly supplied, indestructible gold to
restrict it, money has run riot since.
"With
all its faults, gold does exercise the only important objective restraint
upon that process of evolving a costless and limitless means of payment
toward which the banking economy persistently progresses," wrote John Henry Williams, then Harvard
professor of political economy and soon to become vice-president of research
at the New York Fed, in a 1932 essay, The Crisis of the Gold Standard, in Foreign Affairs magazine.
Put another
way, 78 years later, "The heavy reliance on cash in most societies [still]
represents a huge opportunity for banks and non-banks," as McKinsey
consultants said in a special report on non-cash transactions. By their maths, the
payment-processing industry had just enjoyed its first $1-trillion year in
revenues. Creamed off a global economy generating $63 trillion of business
all told, that's one hell of a rent.
Costless money
has plain benefits, of course. Today's photons and digits are no less "money"
than yesterday's wampum, paper or nickel alloy. Just much
more efficient. They're universally accepted too, unlike Bitcoin's
tragi-comic stab at creating a "new" money
via the magic of computing code alone. But with no limit on money as a means
of exchange, its second key function – holding its value, at least
between when you receive and then spend it – looks increasingly shaky.
Unlimited and costless, weightless and countless, isn't money at risk of
losing its meaning?
"The
legend of King Midas has been generally misunderstood," reckoned Nobel
economist and Princeton professor Paul Krugman in a
1996 column, just as the death of gold
was about to be proclaimed worldwide, together with the end of history.
"Most people think the curse that turned everything the old miser
touched into gold, leaving him unable to eat or drink, was a lesson in the
perils of avarice. But Midas' true sin was his failure to understand monetary
economics.
"What the gods were really
telling him is that gold is just a metal."
All very true, and utterly wrong.
Gold is "just a metal" on the chemist's periodic table alone (and
even there it's unique). In every other sphere of human activity, it has
always been very much more than "just" anything, bearing a
religious, social and emotional power only an academic economist could
dismiss. Silver too has also been used to store wealth since long before the
myth of Midas, and also revered as sacred and eternal in every culture which
ever mined or encountered it.
But what the legend of Midas really
says isn't about gold, however, nor greed. It's
about coined money – and how, right around its emergence sometime in
6th century BC Greece, the world was changed beyond recognition.
"However fascinating for us is
the culture of premonetary Egypt and
Mesopotamia," writes Richard Seaford, professor of Greek at the
University of Exeter, in his book Money and the
Early Greek Mind, "it remains irreducibly alien.
The earliest Greek poetry and wisdom, on the other hand, we citizens of a
thoroughly monetised society recognise as...somehow more akin to us than
anything from those earlier civilisations."
How come?
Tracing the role of gold and silver, gift-exchange, plunder and sacrificial
rites through the writings left to us, Seaford spots "two unprecedented
phenomena: the construction by individual 'philosophers' of impersonal
cosmology, and [in tragic drama] the extreme isolation of the individual from
the gods and from his own kin." Any of us can feel those two pull on us
today, in just the way that cat-headed ghouls blessing mummified souls on a
pyramid's wall do not.
Greek
religion was previously built on creation myths, with all-too-human deities
on Mount Olympus taking out their spite and passions on the people formed
from clay below. Deep social rituals then kept things together on earth, most
notably through the equal sharing of sacrificial meat on silver, copper or
bronze skewers (called obols,
which just happened to become the name of an early Greek coin) and the
less-equal sharing of plunder and booty by war parties. Coined money ripped
these certainties open, most obviously by making each man a king –
metaphysically – able to turn anything he fancied into his personal
treasure by presenting a round, stamped lump of silver or gold in exchange.
Hierarchy,
family ties and tribal loyalties still counted, of course. But coined money
cut across them more surely than a Persian scimitar. It was as a unit of
account, however, and a yard-stick for the value of anything and everything,
that money really fired synapses in the ancient Greek mind.
"The
myth of Midas represents the reaction of the Greek mythical imagination to
the novel and startling power of precious metal as universal
equivalent," writes Seaford. "[His] touch turning everything into
gold expresses early Greek experience of money as a universal means of
exchange."
Money means
everything in the Midas myth. He even saves himself by washing the curse off
in the river Pactolus, from whose alluvial gold the
first coins were most likely made. Another Greek legend attributes the
invention of coinage to the real King Midas of Phrygia's wife.
China and
India also saw coined money develop around the 6th century BC, which surely
deserves deeper study. The role of religion and rite in the emergence of
Greek money has been noted for over 100 years. And we have plenty of what
sound like our own money myths today. "The Fed believes in a strong
Dollar...The ECB will not monetize government debt...I promise to pay the
bearer on demand the sum of five pounds." But these are just lies and
absurdities, not parables to reveal anything useful, let alone to someone
trying to understand or keep hold of their money.
Meanwhile,
the meaning of money in our utterly monetized world – four decades
after breaking 2,500 years of human tradition, and with its newest currency,
the Euro, facing an existential crisis thanks to Athens and
Rome – is less studied and more opaque than the ancient Greek myth of a
king who, in yet another tale, also sprouted donkey's ears because he upset
the god of song.
How the ancient
immortals would laugh! If only money hadn't helped kill them
|
|