|
After
the near-collapse of the financial system in 2008, a growing number of people
have come to realize that our monetary disease is terminal. It is that
group to whom I address this paper. I sincerely hope that this group
includes leaders in business, finance, and government.
I
do not believe that my proposal herein is necessarily “realistic”
(i.e. pragmatic). There are many interest groups that may oppose it for
various reasons, based on their short-sighted desire to try to continue the
status quo yet a while longer. Nevertheless, I feel that I must write
and publish this paper. To say nothing in the face of the greatest
financial calamity would go against everything I believe.
***
It
seems self-evident. The government can debase the currency and thereby
be able to pay off its astronomical debt in cheaper dollars. But as I
will explain below, things don’t work that way. In order to use the
debasement of paper currencies to repay the debt more easily, governments
will need to issue and use the gold bond.
I
give credit for the basic idea of using gold bonds to solve the debt problem
to Professor Antal Fekete, as proposed in his paper: “Cut the Gordian
Knot: Resurrect the Latin Monetary Union” (http://www.professorfekete.com/articles/AEFCutTheGordianKnot.pdf). My paper covers
different ground than Fekete’s, and my proposal is different as
well. I encourage readers to read both papers.
The
paper currencies will not survive too much longer. Most governments now
owe as much or more than the annual GDPs of their nations (typically far
more, under GAAP accounting). But the total liabilities in the system
are much larger.
Even
worse, in the formal and shadow banking system, derivative exposure is
estimated to be more than 700 trillion dollars. Many are quick to
insist that this is the “gross” exposure, and the
“net” is much smaller as these positions are typically
hedged. But the real exposure is close to the “gross”
exposure in a crisis. While each party may be “hedged” by
having a long leg and a balancing short leg, these will not “net
out”. This is because in times of stress the bid (but not the
offer) is withdrawn. To close the long leg of an arbitrage, one must
sell on the bid (which could be zero). To close the short leg, one must
buy at the offer (which will still be high). When the bid-ask spread
widens that way, it will be for good reason and it does not do to be an
armchair philosopher and argue that it “should not” occur.
Lots of things will occur that should not occur.
For
example, gold should not go into backwardation. This is another big (if
not widely appreciated) piece of evidence that confidence in the ability of
debtors to pay is waning. Gold and silver went into backwardation in
2008 and have been flitting in and out of backwardation since then.
Backwardation develops when traders refuse to take a “risk free”
profit. That is, the trade is free from all risks except the risk of
default and losing one’s metal in exchange for a defaulted futures
contract. See my paper (http://keithweiner.posterous.com/61392399) for a full treatment of
this topic.
The
root cause of our monetary disease has its origins in the creation of the Fed
and other central banks prior to World War I, and in the insane treaty signed
in 1944 at Bretton Woods in which many nations agreed for their central banks
to use the US dollar as if it were gold, and this paved the way for President
Nixon to pound in the final nail in the coffin. He repudiated the gold
obligations of the US government in 1971, thereby plunging the whole world
into the regime of irredeemable paper.
The
US dollar game is a check-kiting scheme. The Fed issues the dollar,
which is its liability. The Fed buys the US Treasury bond, which is the
asset to balance the liability. The only problem is that the bonds are
payable only in the central bank’s paper scrip! Meanwhile, per
Bretton Woods, the rest of the world’s central banks use the dollar as
if it were gold. It is their reserve asset, and they pyramid credit in
their local currencies on top of it.
It
is not a bug, but a feature, that debt in this system must grow
exponentially. There is no ultimate extinguisher of debt. In my
paper on Inflation (http://keithweiner.posterous.com/inflation-an-expansion-of-counterfeit-credit), I define inflation as an
expansion of counterfeit credit. I define deflation as a forcible
contraction of counterfeit credit, and the inevitable consequence of
inflation. Well, we have had many decades of rampant expansion of
counterfeit credit. Now we will have deflation, and the harder the
central banks try to fight it by forcing yet more expansion of counterfeit
credit, the worse the problem becomes. With leverage everywhere in the
system, it would not take many defaults to wipe out every financial
institution. And there will be many defaults. One default
will beget another and once it really begins in earnest there will be no
stopping the cascade.
Another
key problem is duration mismatch. Today, every bank and financial
institution borrows short to lend long, many corporations borrow short to
finance long-term projects, and every government is borrowing short to fund
perpetual debts. Duration mismatch can cause runs on the banks and
market crashes, because when depositors demand their money, banks must
desperately sell any asset they can into a market that is suddenly “no
bid”. In two papers (http://keithweiner.posterous.com/fractional-reserve-is-not-the-problem and http://keithweiner.posterous.com/falling-interest-rates-and-duration-mismatch), I cover duration mismatch
in banks and corporations in more depth.
Most
banks and economists have supported a policy of falling interest rates since
they began to fall in 1981. But falling interest rates destroy capital,
as I explain in that last paper, linked above. As the rate of interest
falls, the real burden of the debt, incurred at higher rates, increases.
Related
to this phenomenon is the fact that the average duration of bonds at every
level has been falling for a long time (US Treasury duration began increasing
post 2008, but I think this is an artifact of the Fed’s purchases in
their so-called “Quantitative Easing”). Declining duration
is an inevitable consequence of the need to constantly “roll”
debts. Debts are never repaid, the debtor merely pays the interest and
rolls the principal when due. As the duration gets shorter and shorter,
the noose gets tighter and tighter. If there is to be a real payback of
debt, even in nominal terms, we need to buy more time. At the US
Treasury level, average duration is about 5 years. I doubt that’s
long enough.
And
of course the motivation for building this broken system in the first place
is the desire by nearly everyone to have a welfare state, without the
corresponding crippling taxation. It has been long believed by most
people a central bank is just the right kind of magic to let one have this
cake and eat it too, without consequences. Well, the consequences are
now becoming visible. See my papers (http://keithweiner.posterous.com/the-laffer-curve-and-austrian-economics and http://keithweiner.posterous.com/a-politically-incorrect-look-at-marginal-tax) discussing what raising
taxes will do, especially in the bust phase like we have now.
In
reality, stripped of the fancy nomenclature and the abstraction of a monetary
system, the picture is as simple as it is bleak. Normally, people
produce more than they consume. They save. A frontier farmer in
the 19th century, for example, would dedicate some work to
clearing a new field, or building a smokehouse, or putting a wall around a
pasture so he could add to his herd. But for the past several decades,
people have been tricked by distorted price signals (including bond prices,
i.e. interest rates) into consuming more than they produce.
In
any case, it is not possible to save in an irredeemable paper currency.
Depositing money in a bank will just result in more buying of government
bonds. Capital accumulation has long since turned to capital
decumulation.
This
would be bad enough, as capital is the leverage on human effort that allows
us to have the present standard of living. We don’t work any
harder than early people did 10,000 years ago, and yet we are vastly more
productive due to our accumulated capital.
Now
much of the capital is gone, and it cannot be brought back. It will
soon be impossible to continue to paper over the losses. The purpose of
this piece is not to propose how to save the dollar or the other paper
currencies. They are past the point where saving them is
possible. This paper is directed to avoiding the collapse of our
civilization.
If
we stay on the present course, I think the outcome will look more like 472 AD
than 1929. We must solve three problems to avoid that kind of collapse:
1.
Repayment
of all debts in nominal terms
2.
Keep
bank accounts, pensions, annuities, corporate payrolls, annuities, etc.
solvent, in nominal terms
3.
Begin
circulation of a proper currency before the collapse of the paper currencies,
so that people have something they can use when paper no longer works
I
propose a few simple steps first, and then a simple solution. All of
this is designed to get gold to circulate once again as money. Today,
we have gold “souvenir coins”. They are readily available,
and have been for many years, but they do not circulate.
A
gold standard is like a living organism. While having the right
elements present and arranged in the right way is necessary, it is not
sufficient. It must also be in constant motion. Gold, under the
gold standard, was always flowing. Once the motion is stopped,
restarting it is not easy. This applies to a corpse of a man as well as
of a gold standard.
The first
steps are:
1.
Eliminate
all capital “gains” taxes on gold and silver
2.
Repeal
all legal tender laws that force creditors to accept paper
3.
Also
repeal laws that nullify gold clauses in contracts
4.
Open the
mint to the (seigniorage) free coinage of gold and silver; let people bring
in their metal and receive back an equal amount in coin form. These
coins should not be denominated in paper currency units, but merely ounces or
grams
Each
of these items removes one obstacle for gold to circulate as money, along
side the paper currencies. The capital “gains” tax will do
its worst damage precisely when people need gold the most. At that
point, the nominal price of gold in the paper currencies will be rising very
rapidly. Any sale of bullion will result in a tax of virtually the
entire amount, as the cost basis from even a few weeks prior will be much
lower than the current price. This amounts, in the US, to a 28%
confiscation of gold. This tax will force people to keep gold
underground and not bring it to market. It will contribute to the
acceleration of permanent backwardation.
It
is important to realize that gold is not “going up”. Paper
is going down. There is no gain for the holder of gold; he has simply
not lost wealth due to the debasement of paper.
Current
law forces creditors to accept paper as payment in full for all debts, and
there are also laws that nullify gold clauses in contracts. Repeal
them, and let creditors and borrowers negotiate something mutually agreeable.
Finally,
the bid-ask spread on gold bullion coins such as the US gold eagle or the
South African krugerrand is too wide. If the mint provided
seigniorage-free coinage service, then people would bring in gold bars and
other forms of bullion until the bid-ask spread narrowed appropriately.
One of the attributes that gives gold its “moneyness” is its
tight spread (even today, it is 10 to 30 cents per $1600 ounce!) But
currently, this tight spread only applies to large bullion bars traded by the
bullion banks and other sophisticated traders. This spread must be
available to the average person.
As
I said earlier, these steps are necessary. Gold certainly will not
circulate under the current leftover regime from Roosevelt and Nixon.
But it is not sufficient to address the debt problem.
Accordingly,
I propose a simple additional step. The government should sell gold
bonds. By this, I do not mean gold “backed” paper
bonds. I mean bonds denominated in ounces of gold, which pay their
coupon in ounces of gold and pay the principal amount in ounces of
gold. Below, I explain how this will solve the three problems I
described above.
Mechanically,
it is straightforward. The government should set a rule that, to buy a
gold bond, one does not bid dollars. One bids paper bonds! So to
buy a 100-ounce gold bond, then one could bid for example $160,000 worth of
paper bonds (assuming the price of gold is $1600 per ounce). The
government retires the paper bond and in exchange replaces it with a
newly-issued gold bond.
The
government should start with a small tender, to ensure a high bid to cover
ratio. And a series of small auctions will give the market time to
accept the idea. It will also allow the development of gold bond market
makers.
With
gold bonds, it would be possible to sell long durations. With paper,
there is no good reason to buy a 30-year bond (except to speculate on the
next move by the central bank). The dollar is expected to fall
considerably over a 30-year period. But with gold, there is no such
debasement. The government could therefore exchange short-duration debt
for long-duration debt.
At
first, the price of the gold bonds would likely be set as a straight
conversion of the gold price, perhaps adjusted for differing durations.
For example, a 100 ounce gold bond of 30 years duration might be bid at
$160,000 worth of 30-year paper bond.
But I think that the bid on gold bonds will rise far above “par”,
for several reasons I will discuss below.
The
nature of the dynamic will become clear to more and more people in due
course. In the present regime, there is a common misconception that the
yield on a bond is set by the market’s expectation of how much consumer
prices will rise (the crude proxy for the loss of value for the
dollar). But this is not true. Unlike in a gold standard, in an
irredeemable paper standard, people are disenfranchised. They have no
say over the rate of interest. The dollar system is a closed loop, and
if you sell a bond then you either hold cash in a bank, which means the bank
will buy a bond. Or you buy another asset. In which case the
seller of that asset holds cash in a bank or buys a bond. This is one
of the reasons why the rate of interest has been falling for 30 years despite
huge debasement. All dollars eventually go into the Treasury bond.
The
price of the paper bond today is set by a combination of central bank buying,
and structural distortions in the system. But it is a self-referential
price, in a game between the Treasury and the Fed. The price of the
bond does not really come from the market. And this impacts every other
bond in the universe, which all trade at varying spreads to the Treasury.
An
alternative to paper bonds would be very attractive to those who want to save
and earn income for the long term, pension funds, annuities, etc. Not
only will the price of gold continue to rise (i.e. the value of the paper
currency will continue to fall towards zero), but also a premium for gold
bonds would develop and grow. The quality asset will be recognized to
be worth more, and at the least people would price in whatever rate of the
price of gold they expect to occur over the duration of the bond.
This
dynamic—a rising price of gold, and a rising exchange value of gold
bonds for paper bonds—will allow governments and other debtors
to use the devaluation of paper as a means to repay their debts
in nominal terms, but affordably in real terms.
This
is impossible under paper bonds! This is because the process of
debasement is a process of the Treasury borrowing more money. Debt goes
up to debase the dollar. This path leads not to repayment of the debt
cheaply, but to exponentially growing debt until a total default.
So
we have solved problem number one. With a rising gold price, and a
rising exchange rate of gold bonds for paper bonds, we have set up a dynamic
whereby every paper obligation can be met in nominal terms. Of course,
the value of that paper will be vastly lower than it is today. This is
the only way that the immense amounts of debt outstanding can possibly be
honored.
This
also solves problem number two. If every financial institution is
repaid every nominal dollar it is owed, then they will remain solvent.
To be sure, pension payments, bank accounts, corporate payroll, and annuities
etc. will be of much lower real value. But there is a critical
difference between smoothly losing value vs. abruptly losing everything,
along with catastrophic failure of the financial system.
I
want to address what could be a misconception at this point. Does this
work only for governments that have gold reserves in the vaults? No,
this is not about gold reserves. While that may help accelerate a gold
bond program, the essential is not gold stocks but gold flows. The
government issuer of gold bonds must have a gold income (or a credible plan
to develop one quickly).
And
this leads to problem number three. Gold does not circulate
today. Who has a gold income? That is where we must look to begin
the loop. There is one kind of participant today who has a gold income:
the gold miner. Beset by environmentalist lawsuits, regulations,
permits, impact studies, fees, labor law, confiscatory taxes, and other
obstacles created by government, these companies still manage to extract gold
out of the ground.
The
gold miners are the group to which we must turn to help solve the catch-22 of
getting gold to circulate from the current state where it does not. I
think there is a simple win-win proposition to offer them. In exchange
for exemptions from the various taxes, regulations, environmentalism, etc. they
have a choice to pay a tax in gold bullion.
There
are other kinds of entities to consider taxing, but the problem is that they
all would need to buy gold in the open market in order to pay the tax.
As the price begins to rise exponentially, this will be certain bankruptcy
for anyone but a gold miner.
And
now, look at the progress we’ve made on the problem of getting gold to
circulate. We have gold miners paying tax in gold to governments who
are making bond coupon payments in gold to investors who now have a gold
income. We can see how gold bond market makers will enter the scene,
and earn a gold income to provide liquidity for bonds that are not “on
the run”. These bond market makers could pay a tax in gold also.
And
we have released other creditors from any restriction in lending and
demanding repayment in gold. And anyone else in a position to sign a
long-term agreement involving a stream of payments over a long period of
time, such as landlords, can incorporate gold clauses in their contracts.
And if the tenant has a gold income, perhaps from owning a gold bond, he can
manage his cash flows and confidently sign such a lease.
Note
that the lender, unlike the employee, the restaurant, or most other economic
actors, is in a position to demand gold. While everyone else would like
to be paid in gold, they haven’t got the pricing power to demand
it. The lender can say: “if you want my capital, you must repay
it in gold!”
If
enough gold bonds are issued soon enough, we may reverse the one-way flow of
gold from the markets into private hiding, that is inexorably leading to
inevitable permanent backwardation and the withdrawal of all gold from the
system.
One of the key points in my backwardation paper is that the value of the
dollar collapses to zero not as a consequence of the quantity
of dollars rising to infinity, but because of the desire of some dollar
holders to get gold. If they cannot trade paper for gold, then they
will trade paper for commodities without regard to price and trade
those commodities for gold. This will cause the price of the
commodities in dollar terms to rise to levels that make the dollar useless in
trade (and collapse the price of commodities in gold terms).
If
we reverse the flow of gold out of the markets, we may be able to prevent
this disaster from occurring. The dollar will then continue to lose
value in a continuous (if accelerating) manner, as people migrate to gold.
This
is the best outcome that could possibly be hoped for. If it occurs
along with a reduction in spending so that spending does not exceed (tax)
revenues, we will avert Armageddon and be on the path to a proper and real
recovery. To be clear, times will be hard and the average standard of
living will decline precipitously.
But
this is infinitely preferable to total collapse.
It
is now up to farsighted leaders, especially in government, to take the first
concrete steps towards saving Western Civilization.
|
