|
|
|
|
Gold is consolidating at the low end of the recent range on the
eve of the Brexit vote in the UK. Polling continues to suggest the referendum
could go either way tomorrow.
Société Générale global strategist Albert Edwards concurs that Brexit is a
big distraction that has taken the eyes of many investors (and certainly the
media) off of some more significant major problems (see yesterday's DMR).
"There is an argument that global investors have overly focused on
Brexit at the expense of other more important macro events," Edwards
wrote in a recent note to clients.
The IMF cut their estimation of U.S. growth to 2.2% from 2.4% for 2016. They
warned that growing economic headwinds and "pernicious secular trends in
income" could slow growth for the long-term. The IMF also gave a nod to
the current Fed policy stance: "At this point in the cycle, there is a
clear case to proceed along a very gradual upward path for the fed funds rate."
Janet Yellen was back on Capitol Hill today for part-two of her semiannual
monetary policy testimony, this time before the House Financial Services
Committee. Ms. Yellen reiterated that negative rates are not being considered
by the Fed, although as she stated yesterday, she believes the central bank
does "have the legal basis to pursue negative rates."
Ben Hunt of Salient Partners disagrees. In his Epsilon
Theory newsletter he revealed the following:
Major U.S. money market fund providers like TIAA-CREF have
already announced plans to stop providing fee waivers as new regulations
force fund type consolidation, which will create negative rates in the safe,
liquid funds that remain. It’s baked in. It’s going to happen. — Ben Hunt
While a prolific writer, Mr. Hunt has a gift for summing
things up succinctly. His warning about why we need to be concerned — very
concerned — about ZIRP and NIRP is perhaps the most cogent argument you'll
hear:
Just wait until the entire notion of compounding — without
exaggeration the most important force in human economic history — is turned
on its head and becomes a wealth destroyer. — Ben Hunt
Think about that for a
moment. If saving money becomes a "wealth destroyer" — as it
already has in some parts of the world — it will be a monumental sea-change.
It will send savers scurrying for an alternative means to preserve their
wealth. Perhaps the most logical option is physical gold. You'll want to get
out in front of that rush.
In yesterday's Q&A session before the Senate Banking Committee, Pat
Toomey of Pennsylvania asked Janet Yellen if she had considered that the
long-term effects of zero percent rates might be negative . . .
Ms. Yellen answered, "No."
Be concerned. Very concerned.
|
|
Read the rest of the article at
USA Gold