Three years ago on November
18th a landmark event polarized the gold world. The first gold
exchange-traded fund to trade in the United States, the StreetTracks Gold Shares, was launched. Although
born in controversy, even GLD’s original
detractors cannot argue with this ETF’s
stunning success since.
Nearing its third birthday,
GLD just reported massive holdings of 19.3m ounces of gold held in trust for
its investors. When your gold holdings get this large though, you
don’t even measure them in ounces anymore. Instead you switch to
metric tonnes. This week, GLD reported nearly 600 tonnes of
physical gold bullion under management for American investors. This is
a staggering amount of gold.
If GLD was a central bank,
it would nearly make the top 10 in the world for gold holdings. This single
American gold ETF has more gold than 100 individual central banks. GLD
is just a hair away from overtaking China too, which would give it
the 10th spot. This ETF has more gold than the individual (not collective)
central banks of Spain, Russia, India,
Venezuela, the UK, Saudi Arabia,
and South Africa!
According to the IMF, total
global official gold holdings in late 2006 ran at 30,435 tonnes. It
took central banks decades, and in many cases centuries, to accumulate so
much gold. Yet after three short years, the blink of an eye compared to
millennia of gold accumulation, GLD’s
holdings are nearly 2% of those of all the world’s central banks combined!
And if central banks are radically over-reporting their holdings as some
suspect, GLD may very well hold a substantially higher fraction of
above-ground gold.
While I will probably never
buy GLD myself as I happen to be a physical gold guy, I am very excited about
its dazzling success. Over two years before GLD launched, I
was writing about how awesome a true gold ETF would be for the young gold
bull. It is not that investors need a replacement for physical gold
coins, we don’t. GLD wasn’t created to attempt to replace
gold, but instead merely to track it.
I strongly believe every
investor should have a foundation of physical gold coins in his own immediate
physical possession before he ever buys a single paper investment. Real
physical gold is the ultimate insurance policy to protect your hard-earned
wealth from devastating low-probability events that periodically ravage paper
markets. It is the one timeless asset that will thrive through all
financial storms.
Unfortunately though, only
a very small fraction of American investors own physical gold today. Most
have simply not yet “discovered” gold and realized how strong its
bull has become. Others know of gold, but either cannot buy it physically
for contractual reasons or are just not motivated to find a local coin store
and buy some. Still others understandably balk at the gigantic (by
stock-market standards) markups that coin stores
need to charge to stay in business.
GLD is not for us hardcore
physical gold investors, it is for these people. GLD allows an investor
to effortlessly add a little gold-price exposure to his portfolio. GLD
enables institutional investors that can only trade in the stock markets per
their charters to get gold exposure. GLD acts as a gateway for new
investors to add “gold” to their portfolios without spending the
time to find a good coin store. GLD gives new investors time to get
comfortable with gold investing before they finally decide to buy physical gold.
GLD is perfect for
speculators too. They can buy and sell it at will instantly with their
stock accounts, no travel or hauling physical gold around is required. Sooner
or later, I believe a robust options market will spring up around GLD too,
offering even more gold-exposure trading alternatives for speculators. And
since the GLD ETF is traded just like a stock, its bid-ask spread is a tiny
fraction of those found in coin stores. It is a very efficient
way to trade gold.
GLD creates a critical conduit
that enables the vast pools of capital in the stock markets to flow into
physical gold bullion. If stock-market demand for GLD exceeds the
underlying demand in the physical-gold markets, the GLD trust goes out and
buys gold bullion to shunt this excess stock demand into gold. If GLD
did not equalize stock demand into physical this way, soon its price would
decouple from gold’s to the upside. This would obviously be
unacceptable for an ETF explicitly created to track the gold price.
But of course feeding
stock-market capital into the gold market is a double-edged sword. If
selling pressure on GLD is greater than that in gold, the ETF’s
custodians have to sell gold bullion to vent this imbalance into the physical
gold world. If they did not do this, GLD would decouple from gold to
the downside. So GLD and the other gold ETFs
will increasingly contribute to gold volatility as their holdings grow.
The only way any ETF,
including this one, can consistently and precisely track its underlying asset
is if the ETF’s custodians rapidly equalize
supply/demand differentials that arise between the ETF and the asset it
tracks. GLD and the other gold ETFs are so
awesomely bullish because they create the mechanism, the conduit, for the
vast pools of stock-market capital to flow in and out of the physical gold
market.
And despite GLD’s massive gold holdings, it is still
vanishingly small compared to stock-market capital. With $16b worth of
gold under management, GLD is still only 1/13th the market capitalization of
Google alone! Compared to the entire S&P 500’s huge $14,003b
market cap, GLD’s trivial value looks like a
rounding error. So should we gold investors want a way for stock
capital to flow into our tiny market? You’re darned right we
should! The more capital coming in, the bigger this gold bull.
GLD’s impact on the
gold world has already been big in its initial three years, and it will only
grow as GLD becomes more widely known as the premier way for American stock
capital to game the gold price. The most intriguing characteristic of
GLD in its young life is its gold holdings relative to the gold price. As
this chart shows, so far GLD has contributed far more to gold’s upside
moves than downside moves.
After its birth in November
2004, GLD’s holdings rocketed from 8 tonnes
to 100t in its first week of trading. Obviously there was plenty of
pent-up demand for gold-price exposure for stock-market capital. But
intriguingly, GLD holdings even continued to grow during the gold
consolidation of the first half of 2005. This means demand growth for
GLD, despite the weak gold prices, exceeded that of gold itself. The
ETF custodians had to equalize this excess stock demand into gold by buying
more bullion.
By late 2005 and early
2006, gold was soaring in a powerful upleg, its
first since GLD was launched. GLD bullion holdings rocketed in
sympathy, blasting 105t higher to 334t in December and January alone! Once
again GLD holdings were growing at a much higher rate than the underlying
gold-price appreciation. Since demand growth for GLD far outstripped
that of gold this excess demand was shunted into the metal.
Then in February 2006 gold
started consolidating, but interestingly GLD’s
holdings remained stable. When GLD can track gold without buying or
selling bullion, it means that the individual supply-demand balances of both
GLD and physical gold are essentially equal. So despite gold’s
early 2006 consolidation, the selling rate of GLD did not exceed that of
physical gold.
A couple months later in
spring 2006 gold rocketed higher in a terminal parabola, its sharpest run of
its entire bull market. GLD holdings were pretty stable during this parabola,
indicating that its own supply/demand profile matched that of gold’s
closely. As long as the GLD ETF closely tracks gold’s underlying
price moves, its custodians do not have to buy and sell gold bullion.
Right after this gold
parabola topped, gold crashed in mid-2006. Selling in the physical and
futures markets was fast and furious and the gold price plummeted. Naturally
GLD fell too as its own holders fled the gold carnage. But
interestingly as you can see above, the GLD bullion holdings only had a
trivial dip through this crash. The stock guys who owned GLD were no
more scared than the gold traders so they didn’t dump their GLD at a
much faster rate than gold itself was falling.
And as gold drifted lower
following a bounce after that mid-2006 crash, GLD holdings were stable and
even grew modestly. As gold started rallying again into early 2007, GLD
again caught the imaginations of stock investors and they bought GLD at a
faster rate than gold was being bought. So the custodians once again
shunted this stock demand into physical gold by adding more bullion. While
gold’s weakness in Q2 this year weighed on ETF holdings a bit, they
soon shot to new highs as our latest powerful upleg
began.
And now, three years after
its launch, GLD has soared to the staggering 600t mark. Since many
existing gold-coin investors still view this “paper gold” with
disdain and suspicion, I don’t think it was traditional gold capital
that bid GLD up to 600t of gold. No, more than likely it was new stock
capital that hadn’t yet been active in this gold bull in a meaningful
way.
Pick a number, but
I’d bet that at least 80% of GLD’s run
higher was driven by non-traditional gold investors. This conservative
estimate works out to 480t. So thanks to the mere existence of this
flagship gold ETF, somewhere between 480t to 600t of gold made it into the
portfolios of American stock investors that probably wouldn’t have
otherwise. And GLD is but one of many gold ETFs
worldwide!
And the fact that GLD’s holdings have spent three years growing on
balance regardless if gold is soaring, sinking, or drifting is extremely
bullish. It suggests that there is a vast untapped market of capital
that trades in stock accounts that wants some exposure to this gold bull.
The more that mainstream
investors new to gold become aware of it, the higher demand for GLD will
grow. Awareness should ramp rapidly as gold hits new all-time nominal highs that the media
will cover extensively. And as long as GLD demand growth outstrips
gold’s, this ETF will drive gold higher and faster than the metal would
otherwise achieve without stock capital chasing it. Shunting stock
investors’ capital into physical gold via ETFs
is a very, very good thing for all gold investors.
GLD’s daily trading
volume is also intriguing and adds additional insights into how GLD trading
is flowing into and impacting the underlying gold market. Realize that
each share of GLD represents 1/10th of an ounce of gold. So if you want
to mentally convert GLD volume into effective gold volume traded by American
stock accounts, then just divide the left axis by 10.
Whenever an asset grows
more popular, which is virtually inevitable the longer a price rises on
balance, trading volume increases. We have definitely seen this in
GLD. The straight line drawn through GLD volume above is a mathematical
best-fit line. So average GLD volume has soared from around 2m shares a
day to about 7m now in just three years.
This is all the more
remarkable considering gold was consolidating for over half of this
period. Generally during consolidations, trading interest fades as
traders get bored. Without rising prices, traders usually gradually
exit a market and look for greener fields elsewhere. And while we did
see this to some extent in GLD, its volume waned a bit during consolidations,
it was still rising on balance. This means interest in GLD, the ETF’s popularity among stock investors, was
steadily growing.
But this raw share-volume
growth really understates GLD’s trading
impact. Capital volume should also be considered. Capital volume
is shares traded multiplied by the share price. If you tell me
you bought a million shares of a stock yesterday, but it was one trading at
just a penny, I won’t be too impressed. But if you bought a
million shares of Google, holy cow that is a mighty big line you are
swinging. Volume must be considered in concert with share price to
really see growth trends.
Back in early 2005 when GLD
was young and trading 2m shares a day or so, this ETF was only worth about
$43. So this works out to $86m in capital volume per day as a rough
benchmark. Assuming 7m is now average today,
and GLD is trading near $80 per share, we are talking about $560m in capital
volume. Thus trading interest in GLD has grown on the order of 7x since its November 2004 debut! Driving this kind
of interest among stock traders makes GLD an unqualified runaway success.
GLD’s big volume
spikes also offer insights into GLD traders’ behavior
and hence impact on the gold price. Note above that the ETF’s biggest volume spikes tended to occur near
interim highs leading into their following intense selloffs.
Since GLD volume soared on these selloffs, its
traders certainly feel fear like all speculators do. But collectively
this fear wasn’t enough to drive GLD down much faster than gold. This
is evidenced by GLD’s stable bullion holdings
during selloffs even despite these big volume
spikes.
It is possible, indeed
probable, that in the future some big gold selloff
will spook the GLD holders so much that they will dump GLD at a much faster
rate than gold. In order to maintain gold tracking in this scenario,
the ETF custodians will have to sell off bullion to equalize this sell-side
imbalance between GLD and the metal. This will exacerbate and amplify
the big gold selloff. But so far at least, GLD’s downside impact on gold has been minimal
while its upside impact has been substantial.
Now these stock traders are
buying GLD because they want exposure to the gold price in their portfolios.
So the degree to which GLD actually tracks gold is crucial to this ETF’s continuing acceptance and growth. This
next chart quantifies the variance between the GLD share price times ten (to
equate to one ounce) and a couple of key gold benchmarks. Considering
gold’s increasing volatility, GLD’s
custodians have done an outstanding job of maintaining tight GLD tracking of
gold.
To evaluate GLD’s tracking of gold, its entire mission in life,
first check out the yellow GLDx10 line overlaying the blue gold price. As
is evident visually, GLD has tracked all the underlying volatility in the
metal itself extremely well. Life to date, GLD’s
correlation r-square with gold is a staggering 99.97%! Thus for all
intents and purposes, trading GLD offers the same exposure to the gold price
as gold itself.
Despite such a statistical
mirroring, GLD’s tracking of gold has
loosened slightly. While it covered the blue gold line above perfectly
in its first year, since then GLD’s small but
noticeable deviation from the metal is definitely growing. This may
bother some traders, but it doesn’t bother me a bit. It was not
only known in advance when this ETF launched that this was inevitable, but
this trivial deviation hasn’t materially affected GLD’s
returns versus gold’s. Since GLD’s
launch day, it is up 85.3% at best compared to gold’s 88.9%.
Why is this
happening? Like everyone else, the GLD custodians deserve to make a
living and earn a profit from their hard work. So like every ETF on the
planet, they charge a reasonable management fee to maintain GLD and keep it
tracking gold. GLD’s is 0.4% per
year. If you own this ETF, you will pay 0.4% of its assets annually for
this privilege. So after three years, there is about 1.2% less gold per
share than there was initially at launch.
This is reflected by the
red variance downtrend rendered above. It is the 5-day moving average
of the gold close divided by the GLDx10 close. The white line does the
same thing with the London PM fix, which is the gold benchmark off of which GLD’s custodians choose to measure themselves. GLD’s
variances on balance are so tight that they only reflect this management
fee. GLD, like all other ETFs, is a
very-gradually wasting asset. But this is just the nature of the ETF
beast, the price for convenience.
The most popular ETF today
is the PowerShares QQQ which tracks the NASDAQ
100. As the elite ETF, it is considered the best in the
business. The QQQQ custodians charge a 0.2% annual management fee, so
each year the value of the QQQQs relative to the
NASDAQ 100 shrinks by 0.2%. This is not that much lower than GLD’s expense ratio, despite the fact that buying,
selling, and moving physical gold is vastly more expensive than instant
electronic transfers of stocks. GLD’s
expense ratio is certainly fair, especially considering the bid-ask and commissions on a single round-trip coin
trade can run 3% to 6%.
And with the exception of
this necessary cost of running an ETF, GLD has tracked gold nearly
perfectly. This is evident both visually and statistically. This
kind of flawless record, exposing stock capital to the gold price just as
advertised, should work to attract in countless new investors in the years to
come. GLD really is the quickest and easiest way for traders to gain
gold-price exposure via their usual stock-trading accounts.
Now traditional
physical-gold-coin investors still don’t like GLD for the most part,
and I certainly agree with them that GLD is “paper gold” since it
isn’t physical in your own immediate possession. If you
don’t like GLD and would rather own real gold coins, more power to
you. I am the same way personally. But despite my own
proclivities I am really glad there are alternatives for other investors who
don’t share my worldview. I won’t eat McDonald’s
hamburgers because I don’t care for their taste. Nevertheless, I
still think McDonald’s is a fantastic company and I am glad it exists
for people who do like its hamburgers.
Three years after its
birth, traditionalist objections to GLD generally surround two fronts. I
would like to address them briefly. The first wonders if GLD really has
the physical gold bullion that it claims it has. The second wonders if
GLD demand from stock capital is cannibalizing demand for actual gold
stocks. If you are worried about either of these factors, rest assured
that you aren’t GLD’s target market
anyway.
Does GLD really have all
the gold it claims? I don’t know. I have never been to GLD’s vaults. And if I did go, since I am not
a metallurgist I would have no way of knowing if the bars I held were solid
gold or gold-plated lead. When you think about it, there is really very
little we actually know as investors. I own dozens of mining
companies that collectively claim to operate over 100 mines worldwide. But
I have never seen one of these mines with my own eyes. Do they really
exist? And if I did travel to one, as a non-geologist I’d have no
way of knowing if the ore the company showed me really contained the metals
claimed or if it was just useless waste rock.
Ultimately, when it comes
down to it, all investment relies on trust. We choose to believe
what the companies we own tell the SEC, their auditors, the media, and
us. And most of the time this system works exceedingly well. For
every fraud like Enron, there are hundreds of good honest companies worldwide
that are really doing exactly what they are telling investors they are
doing. After three years of studying GLD, and looking into all the controversy, I have no
reason to believe it is not telling the truth on its gold bullion. I
don’t know for sure, and I can’t know for sure, but this
ETF seems perfectly legitimate to me.
On GLD cannibalizing
gold-stock investment, I don’t believe this theory for a minute. Traders
buy gold stocks because they greatly leverage gold’s
gains. Gold is up 225% at best bull-to-date while the HUI gold-stock
index is up 1167%. This is huge 5.2x leverage! Gold-stock traders
willingly assume much greater risks plaguing specific companies and projects
in order for a shot at far higher returns. Since GLD at best can
only mirror gold’s gains minus a 0.4% expense ratio annually, it is
not a competitor with gold stocks. Gold stocks are a pure gold leverage
play, and GLD has zero gold leverage.
Speaking of gold stocks,
thanks to their massive gains so far and even greater potential ahead, they are my
vehicle of choice to ride this gold bull. Just this week my business
partner Scott Wright finished a brand-new report on our favorite 20 gold producers. After starting with
well over 100 gold stocks worldwide, we spent four months whittling them down
to our 20 favorite producers through deep and
extensive fundamental research.
While we do all this hard
research work to know what the most promising companies are to recommend to our subscribers and deploy our
own capital in, due to popular demand we also sell it. If you are
interested, our new report is now on sale. Its new format delves into
each company’s fundamentals on a project-by-project basis to get you up
to speed on fantastic opportunities. If you want to know where to
deploy gold-stock capital, and save yourself many hundreds of hours of
research, buy this report today.
Back to GLD, the bottom
line is its impact in the gold world is already big and is only
growing. Whether or not a gold ETF appeals to you, alternative ways to
buy gold are very healthy for the entire gold market. The more capital
that flows into gold, regardless of source or conduit, the bigger this bull
will ultimately grow and the greater the profits will balloon for all of us.
Gold ETFs are a hugely important capital and psychological
gateway into gold for non-traditional gold investors. Let’s
welcome them! The more the merrier. No, GLD is not the same as a
gold coin in your fist, but it isn’t intended to be. It is a
remarkably efficient and low-transaction-cost way for stock traders to gain gold-price
exposure via their usual stock-trading accounts. And GLD has excelled in this mission.
Adam
Hamilton, CPA
Zealllc.com
November
16, 2007
So how can
you profit from this information?
We publish an acclaimed monthly newsletter, Zeal Intelligence,
that details exactly what we are doing in terms of actual stock and options
trading based on all the lessons we have learned in our market research. Please consider joining us each month
for tactical trading details and more in our premium Zeal Intelligence
service at … www.zealllc.com/subscribe.htm
Questions
for Adam? I would be more
than happy to address them through my private consulting business. Please visit www.zealllc.com/adam.htm for more
information.
Thoughts,
comments, or flames? Fire away at
zelotes@zealllc.com. Due to my staggering and perpetually
increasing e-mail load, I regret that I am not able to respond to comments
personally. I will read all
messages though and really appreciate your feedback!
Copyright
2000 - 2006 Zeal Research (www.ZealLLC.com)
|