Paul Krugman sounded the war cry this Sunday on Fareed Zakaria's program Global
Public Square. After all, he asserted, only spending equivalent to another
World War could lead us back to prosperity. That,
and a healthy dose of inflation.
Krugman argued that inflation would address our debt problem
by reducing our bill in current dollar terms and that the Second World War
was a giant stimulus plan that actually worked. Thankfully, he added the
refrain, "Hopefully we don't need a world war to get there," but I
sensed a tinge of regret in his voice. After all, the Keynesian economist's
favorite pastime is seeing people waste their lives digging
holes in the ground or sacrifice their lives in war. Both acts create
economic growth according to the topsy-turvy logic of men like Krugman.
The truth is
that wars are a miserable misallocation of capital and usually leave
financial ruin in their wake. The US did not boom in the '50s because we
fought World War II, but because we resoundingly won. It was the byproduct of
having an unscathed manufacturing base, solid infrastructure, an intact military,
most of the world's gold, and the only reserve currency.
The logical
implication of Krugman's arguments remains that
working in productive employment is not at all necessary. If this is true,
why not have people just save gas and stay home? The government could simply
borrow and/or print money and send it to foreign countries that are dumb
enough to produce goods and services for US consumption. Christina Romer, former Chair to Obama's Council of Economic
Advisors, also sided with Krugman in a commentary
posted in Sunday's New York Times finance section. In it, she pontificated on
the lessons to be learned from the Great Depression, saying: "It would
be a mistake to respond by reducing the deficit more sharply in the
near-term. That would almost surely condemn us to a repeat of the 1937
downturn." This misdirection demonstrates her lack of understanding of
what causes economic depressions in the first place.
The cause of
the Great Depression in the 1930s and the Great Recession beginning in
December 2007 were one and the same - an over-leveraged economy. Easy money
provided by the banking system eventually brings debt in the economy to an
unsustainable level. At that point, the only real and viable solution is for
the public and private sectors to undergo a protracted period of
deleveraging. The ensuing depression is, in actuality, the healing process at
work, and is marked by the selling of assets and the paying down of debt.
Unfortunately, our politicians today are focused on fighting the natural healing
process of deleveraging by promoting the accumulation of even more debt.
During this
latest economic contraction, the Federal Reserve has taken interest rates to
near 0% for the past 2 ¾ years, and it has just promised to keep them
there for an additional 2 years! Meanwhile, the Obama administration is
leveraging up the public sector to record levels in an effort to re-leverage
the private sector. The government's philosophy is tantamount to sticking a
frostbitten man in the freezer so he won't have to suffer the pain associated
with the thawing of his extremities.
During the
Great Depression, real GDP plummeted 32%. The Great Recession, through which
we are still struggling, began in December 2007, according to the National
Bureau of Economic Research. But, in contrast to the 1930s, GDP during this
recession shrank only 3.6% from the fourth quarter of 2007 through its low
point in the second quarter of 2009.
The
contraction in GDP during the Great Depression was the direct result of
consumers paying down debt and selling off assets. Household debt as a
percentage of GDP reached nearly 100% in 1929. To put that number in
perspective, household debt did not go back above 50% of GDP until 1985. And
it was not until the first quarter of 2009 that household debt once again
approached the 1929 level.
Between the
start of the Great Depression and the end of World War II, household debt
fell from 100% to just above 20% of GDP. Getting there was a painful process,
but such de-leveraging was the only real cure for an economy swimming in
debt. Thanks to government efforts to carry on our debt-fueled consumption
binge, during today's Great Recession, household debt has barely contracted
at all - it has only been reduced to 90% of GDP as of Q1 '11.
To make
matters even worse, during this current crisis our government's response has
been to dramatically increase its own borrowing. At the start of the Great
Depression, gross national debt was 16% of GDP. It peaked just below 44% when
the Depression ended. While the national debt did increase significantly
during that period, it was still relatively benign compared to other Western
governments. The US entered this current Great Recession with gross national
debt equal to 65% of GDP. It has since exploded to 98% of GDP!
US federal
debt did rise dramatically during World War II, topping out at 120% of GDP in
1946. But consumer debt plunged concurrently. So, while Washington was adding
debt to fight and win a global war, households were taking the necessary
steps to ensure their balance sheets were well prepared for the aftermath of
the battle.
Today, for
the first time in our history, gross national debt and household debt are
both at least 90% of GDP.
Mr. Krugman and his allies believe that we can grow our way
out of this recession like we have in the past few. Unfortunately, we're
dealing with a completely different animal. In every past recession, the
government, under the guidance of Keynesians, decided to put off deleveraging
in return for artificial growth. Well, that tab has come due.
Since these
economists keep trying to spend like it's World War
III, we are moving inexorably closer to causing Great Depression II. If
policymakers and mainstream economists fail to understand that the progenitor
of a depression is debt, they will also be unable to provide a genuine
solution. Instead, by pushing public debt past the point of our creditors'
willingness to lend, they may ensure that this next Great Depression will be
accompanied by runaway inflation. If history is any guide, this is a truly
lethal combination.
Michael Pento
Subscribe to Euro Pacific's Weekly Digest: Receive
all commentaries by Peter Schiff, John Browne,
and Michael Pento delivered to your inbox
every Monday.
Click here for free access to Euro
Pacific's latest special report: What's Ahead for Canadian Energy
Trusts?
For a great primer on economics, be sure to pick up a copy of Peter
Schiff's hit economic parable, How an Economy Grows and Why It Crashes.
|