|
Are you upset that the courts won't consider Obama's
Constitutional Eligibility because the courts continually rule that the
persons suing don't have standing? Perhaps only the States have standing,
since they are parties to the Constitution.
But there's a way around those issues! Here's a plan
to force the Federal courts to give the issue a hearing.
Here's the idea: Make a contract (review the
contract with a lawyer, first) with a friend or family member who lives in
another state of the Union (to make it a Federal jurisdiction contract
dispute) that says that you will give them $80,000 (federal minimum dollar
dispute) if they prove that Obama is not Constitutionally eligible to be
president of the USA. Let the contract be legit, say, for information for a
book, rather than simply a bet. Bets and gambling can be ruled as not valid
contracts. Legitimate research is legit. This will create a valid and legal
contract dispute that Federal courts will have to hear.
So, let your friend or family member research it and
prove that Obama is not eligible. For example, present to you basic
information that Obama's father was not a US Citizen, such as the following:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37677
"Anyone who reads Article 2, Section 1, of the
Constitution, however, can make that case in less than a minute. Only a
“natural born” individual whose both parents were American
citizens can be President. Obama’s father was a citizen of
Kenya.”
Based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born
An English-language translation of Emerich de Vattel's treatise
The Law of Nations (original French title: Le Droit
du gens), states that "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those
born in the country of parents who are citizens".
Vatel's
treatise, The Law of Nations, is even cited in the US Constitution in Article
1, section 8.
Article 1, section 8:
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and
Offenses against the Law of Nations;
Furthermore, The Law of Nations is repeatedly cited
in Blackstone's commentaries on common law. And, the Supreme Court has ruled,
in Schick vs. The United States, that the
Constitution must be read in light of the common law.
So, after it's proved, then the next step. You
default on payment to your friend or family member. Refuse to pay them for
their research. Then, let them sue you in Federal court to collect. Then, the
judges will have to hear the merits of the case, or, at least, your friend
will be able to file it in Federal court.
Why do I think this is an important issue?
Because we can hack at the root of all of Obama's
horrible policies at once. Why hack at the branches,
or individual actions instead, when you can get rid of Obama entirely? Hack
at the root!
Same principle on why I advocate silver as money.
It's hacking at the root.
Why moan about inflation? Why advocate that they end
the fed? Why advocate that the Fed should raise interest rates, or print less
money, or end bail outs for the bankers, or cut back wasteful government
spending? Why moan at all? Just buy silver. It's so much more powerful of a
way to make the world better, especially your own world.
But after buying silver, you might find yourself
bored, and wanting to file a Federal lawsuit. After all, the more people who
do, the more it can help change the world for the better.
Are you upset that the courts won't consider Obama's Constitutional Eligibility
because the courts continually rule that the persons suing don't have
standing? Perhaps only the States have standing, since they are parties to
the Constitution.
But there's a way around those issues! Here's a plan to force the
Federal courts to give the issue a hearing.
Here's the idea: Make a contract (review the contract with a lawyer,
first) with a friend or family member who lives in another state of the Union
(to make it a Federal jurisdiction contract dispute) that says that you will
give them $80,000 (federal minimum dollar dispute) if they prove that Obama
is not Constitutionally eligible to be president of the USA. Let the contract
be legit, say, for information for a book, rather than simply a bet. Bets and
gambling can be ruled as not valid contracts. Legitimate research is legit.
This will create a valid and legal contract dispute that Federal courts will
have to hear.
So, let your friend or family member research it and prove that Obama
is not eligible. For example, present to you basic information that Obama's
father was not a US Citizen, such as the following:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37677
"Anyone who reads Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution,
however, can make that case in less than a minute. Only a “natural
born” individual whose both parents were American citizens can be
President. Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya.”
Based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born
An English-language translation of Emerich
de Vattel's treatise The Law of Nations (original
French title: Le Droit du gens), states that
"The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of
parents who are citizens".
Vatel's treatise, The
Law of Nations, is even cited in the US Constitution in Article 1, section 8.
Article 1, section 8:
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and
Offenses against the Law of Nations;
Furthermore, The Law of Nations is repeatedly cited in Blackstone's
commentaries on common law. And, the Supreme Court has ruled, in Schick vs.
The United States, that the Constitution must be
read in light of the common law.
So, after it's proved, then the next step. You default on payment to
your friend or family member. Refuse to pay them for their research. Then,
let them sue you in Federal court to collect. Then, the judges will have to
hear the merits of the case, or, at least, your friend will be able to file
it in Federal court.
Why do I think this is an important issue?
Because we can hack at the root of all of Obama's horrible policies at
once. Why hack at the branches, or individual
actions instead, when you can get rid of Obama entirely? Hack at the root!
Same principle on why I advocate silver as money. It's hacking at the
root.
Why moan about inflation? Why advocate that they end the fed? Why
advocate that the Fed should raise interest rates, or print less money, or
end bail outs for the bankers, or cut back wasteful government spending? Why
moan at all? Just buy silver. It's so much more powerful of a way to make the
world better, especially your own world.
But after buying silver, you might find yourself bored, and wanting to
file a Federal lawsuit. After all, the more people who do, the more it can
help change the world for the better.
|
