|
Mayor Don Robart of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio is seeking to eliminate public sector unions. That is certainly
welcome event and hopefully the start of a major trend towards fiscal sanity
in cities across the country.
I found out about Mayor Robart when someone sent a link to a blog journal
called Smell the Change:
Ohio Mayor Suggests It's Time To Eliminate Public Sector Unions.
Here are some snips blog writer Doug Ross compiled from Mayor Robart's annual
State of the City Address.
...as we now know,
the jobs creation promise of 2009 nationally has more closely resembled a
nightmare. With unemployment a year ago at 8%, it is currently over 10% and
since the signing of the stimulus bill, we have lost 2.8 million jobs. These
job loss figures clearly have a direct effect on state and city budgets. Cuyahoga Falls is no exception. Cities essentially rely on two forms of revenue: property
taxes and income taxes. In 2009, we saw both of these revenue sources
decline.
In response to these significant drops in revenue, we mandated that the
nonbargaining employees accept a wage freeze along with six furlough days. Additionally
where applicable, we would cease the ability to sell back vacation and sick
leave. I am proud of the AFSCME union which was the first union to step
forward and agree to our proposal. Our Fire union, the UWUA electric union
and finally the dispatchers, followed shortly. Unfortunately, we did not get
concessions from the two police unions, which necessitated the loss of three
patrolmen and a community service officer. Additionally, four sergeants were
reduced to patrolman status.
In Cuyahoga Falls, we will be negotiating with all six of our public employee
unions. We do not anticipate these negotiations will be easy, however, with a
keen eye on fiscal responsibility, the administration will be resolute in its
demands to lower expenses. And indeed, with payroll representing 75–80%
of our general fund budget, the public sector unions are the obvious place to
go.
Which brings up the question that I have raised in this forum in the past: Is
it time to eliminate public sector unions?
The history of public sector unions goes back to 1962 when President John F.
Kennedy signed executive order 10988 allowing unionization of the federal
workforce. This changed everything in the American political system.
President Kennedy’s order swung open the door for the unrelenting rise
of the unionized public workforce in many states and cities.
And of course, 47 years ago, the American workforce landscape looked very
different. As recently as 1980, there were more than twice as many private
sector union members than there were public sectors. Today 51.4% of Americans
15.4 million [union] workers are employed by the government. This is the
first time in American history that there are more public sector union members
than there are private. So my question is, can we the taxpayers continue
to afford this expense?
...As we can see from the desperate economic and fiscal woes of California,
New Jersey, New York and other states with dominant public unions; this has
become a major problem for the U.S. economy and smaller “d”
democratic governance. The agenda for American political reform needs to
include the breaking of public unions' power to capture an even larger
share of private income.
Thanks for those
snips, Doug.
The real thanks however, go to Cuyahoga Falls Mayor Don Robart who had the
courage to say what needs to be said. Every trend change starts with 1, a single person willing to do something different.
Many have said what Mayor Robart did, but I am aware of no mayors expressing
that view. Moreover, Cuyahoga Falls, is a fair sized city, close to 50,000 in the last census. Good luck mayor, we wish you well.
Voters Say No To Tax Hikes In Colorado Springs
In Colorado Springs, Colorado City removes trash
cans, streetlights to save cash.
If you come to a
neighborhood park in Colorado Springs, plan on bringing your own trash bags. To
save money, the city has removed the trash cans.
Need to catch a bus? Don't try on evenings or weekends. The city has cut that
service, too. And when the sun goes down, Colorado Springs is going to look a
little bit dimmer. Crews are removing a third of the city's streetlight to save
money on electricity and light bulbs.
It's not a new concept in Colorado Springs, touted on some Web sites as a
"libertarian paradise." The city's garbage collection, zoo and
philharmonic are all privately funded.
The city is even auctioning off its police helicopters on the Internet.
The problem with this
response is stopping garbage collection in parks will not save much. The real
meat on the bone is union wages and pensions. However, the fact that the
city's garbage collection, zoo and philharmonic are all privately funded is
certainly welcome.
Colorado Springs needs to take the next step of privatizing the fire
department, or better yet, going to a volunteer fire department.
Change Comes To Jersey City
In Hudson County New Jersey, Members of Jersey
City MUA and Incinerator Authority have to start paying toward health
insurance.
Members of the Jersey
City Municipal Utilities Authority and Jersey City Incinerator Authority may
have to start paying for their health benefits.
Councilman Steven Fulop tried to introduce ordinances Wednesday night that
would have eliminated the benefits altogether, but failed to muster the
necessary votes.
The council instead introduced a measure, backed by Mayor Jerramiah T. Healy,
that would limit health insurance to the member and eliminate family
coverage.
The board members would also have to pay 20 percent of the cost of the
premium. Currently, the agency foots the entire bill.
"This ordinance is a compromise ordinance in that it allows for a
substantial savings while at the same time allowing the commissioners to pay
a portion of their premium to maintain health coverage," Healy said in a
statement yesterday.
According to a memo Healy sent council members, Fulop's proposal would have
saved $287,569 and the "compromise ordinances" would save $155,294.
"It is
absolutely shameful in a time when the lowest level city employees were laid
off, they grant health benefits to politically connected cronies that the
taxpayers fund," Fulop said. "Most of the City Council and
administration clearly do not understand how they are hurting the regular
taxpayers."
Fulop and
Councilwoman Viola Richardson voted against Healy's ordinances. Councilman
Bill Gaughan abstained on the MUA vote since his daughter, Eileen, is
chairwoman and Councilwoman Willie Flood abstained on the JCIA vote because
her husband is chairman.
Councilman Steven
Fulop had the right idea "eliminate the benefits altogether". Notice
the two complete wimps, Councilman Bill Gaughan and Councilwoman Willie Flood
opting out of a vote, effectively preserving huge benefits for their daughter
and husband respectively.
Nonetheless a change was made in the right direction. Expect to see similar
changes elsewhere.
Atlanta Must Change Pension Approach
An editorial opinion in the Atlanta Journal Constitution says City must change
pension approach.
A sobering report
released last week by the pension reform panel convened by Mayor Kasim Reed
clearly laid out the city’s red-ink problem.
In part, Atlanta’s payments toward pensions have risen 13 percent
annually during the past decade. The city paid out $144 million for pensions
last year, up 162 percent from 2001’s $55 million cost.
Worse yet, the gap between the funded and unfunded portions of the pension
plans has grown 21 percent a year since 2001. That means the plans are now
barely more than halfway funded. In 2001, 83 percent was covered.
For the sake of taxpayers, the city must choose quickly on how to climb out
of its pension hole. Paying roughly 20 percent of the city’s general
fund budget for pensions is simply not sustainable. Fixing the problem will
require sacrifices from both the city and its public servants.
The big reforms should apply to non-vested current workers and future hires. That
means a two-tier benefits system going forward.
That said, the city should also consider rolling back at least part of the
formula changes that boosted pension costs in 2001 and 2005.
The Journal did not
go far enough in its recommendations. However, the Journal did recognize the
system is insolvent, in need of change, and its recommendation of a
two-tiered pension system is a big step in the right direction if it happens.
Bob Dylan Revisited
In regards to public pensions, Bob Dylan was right, just 45 years early.
However, there is always change, something that Dylan recognized in his
protest song
The Times They Are A-Changin'. Think about how attitudes towards Russia and China have changed and the pace of that change compared with technology changing. Technology
changes orders of magnitudes faster than attitudes regarding unions and
pensions.
Here is a pertinent verse to sing.
The Times They Are A-Changin'
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.
-- Bob Dylan
Inspiration and Composition
Inquiring minds might be interested in the Inspiration and
Composition for the song.
Dylan appears to have
written the song in September and October 1963. Dylan recalled writing the
song as a deliberate attempt to create an anthem of change for the moment.
Dylan critic Michael Gray called it "the archetypal protest song." Gray
commented, "Dylan's aim was to ride upon the unvoiced sentiment of a
mass public—to give that inchoate sentiment an anthem and give its
clamour an outlet.
Literary critic Christopher Ricks suggests that the song transcends the
political preoccupations of the time in which it was written. Ricks argues
that Dylan is still performing the song, and when he sings "Your sons
and your daughter/Are beyond your command", he sings inescapably with
the accents not of a son, no longer perhaps primarily a parent, but with the
attitude of a grandfather.
Ricks concludes: "Once upon a time it may have been a matter of urging
square people to accept the fact that their children were, you know, hippies.
But the capacious urging could then come to mean that ex-hippie parents had
better accept that their children look like becoming yuppies. And then
Republicans..."
Less than a month after Dylan recorded the song, President John F. Kennedy
was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963. The next night,
Dylan opened a concert with "The Times They Are a-Changin'"; he
told biographer Anthony Scaduto: "I thought, 'Wow, how can I open with
that song? I'll get rocks thrown at me.' But I had to sing it, my whole concert
takes off from there.
I found a You-Tube clip of
Dylan singing The Times They Are A-Changin'.
Dylan is at some small obscure bar early in his career. It's a great clip,
well worth a play, and the play is free, just not embeddable.
Mish
GlobalEconomicAnalysis.blogspot.com
To sign up for a free
copy of Sitka’s Monthly Client Newsletter, please register your
email address at the bottom of the Sitka Pacific Commentary Page.
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Thoughts on the
great inflation/deflation/stagflation debate as well as discussions on gold,
silver, currencies, interest rates, and policy decisions that affect the
global markets.
|
|