It’s been a tough year for gold
investors. Instead of soaring during the great fear and uncertainty of
the global financial panic as most gold investors expected, gold got caught
up in the selling. Thus it is down 7.3% year-to-date. This is far-better performance
than virtually everything else, especially the S&P 500’s 40.7% YTD
loss. Nevertheless, the lack of a flight to gold in such dire
conditions remains disappointing.
Why didn’t gold
rally? Capital fleeing out of the imploding bond and stock markets flooded
into US Treasuries at staggering rates. While Treasuries weren’t
yielding much, at least they sheltered capital from the surrounding universal
panic selling. Before taking refuge in Treasuries, foreign investors first
had to buy US dollars. This frenzied dynamic drove a monster dollar rally
which hammered gold futures.
Since gold has been the
financial-panic asset of choice for centuries, its lackluster trading action
during the last couple months has really shaken gold investors’
confidence. While physical-coin demand has been very high from small
investors, big investors did not rush to buy gold as stock-market fear soared
to unprecedented sustained levels. This is leading to questions about this
gold bull’s ongoing viability.
During times like these when the
technical action and sentiment feel terrible, I find it useful to return to
the core fundamentals. I started recommending physical gold coins to our
subscribers back in May 2001 when gold traded in the $260s. In the 7+ years
since, gold has seen plenty of good and bad spells. Yet one major fundamental
driver remained steadfastly bullish throughout this bull, real interest
rates.
Real rates are the returns realized by
bond investors after inflation is subtracted out. If you earn 5% in
Treasuries, and inflation is running 3%, then you earn a 2% real return. Much
of the 1.05x growth in your nominal capital is eroded by the relentless loss
of purchasing power in the dollar. What you could buy last year for $1.00 now
costs $1.03, so in terms of real goods and services you aren’t
advancing as fast.
Normally real rates are positive. For
putting their hard-earned capital at risk, debt investors deserve to earn a
real purchasing-power return after inflation for their efforts. Even
though they don’t accept much risk compared to stock investors, they
still need to be fairly compensated for this risk. If they are not, they will
invest less over the long term because it is pointless to risk scarce capital
for a guaranteed loss.
Would you loan money to anyone if you
knew you would take a real loss for doing so? Not if you are rational. When
nominal interest rates are forced so low by central banks that real returns
plunge negative, debt investing becomes a losing proposition. In such a
hostile environment, debt investors gradually turn to gold. While bonds
guarantee them a real loss, gold will at least keep pace with inflation to
preserve the purchasing power of their capital.
To understand the interaction between
real rates and gold, you really have to take the long view. Since it takes
years for investors to perceive the impact of inflation and change their
behavior accordingly, gold doesn’t react overnight. But eventually
react it does, and this is very clear over a long-enough time slice. The
longer real bond returns are poor or negative, the more capital gradually
takes refuge in gold.
Interestingly I wrote my first essay in this series back in July 2001 when gold
traded in the $260s. Back then real rates had yet to go negative but the Fed
was hellbent on driving them there. At that time, we only had the
example of the 1970s to consider. But now, the lion’s share of a decade
later, the real-rates-and-gold comparison is vividly apparent in the 2000s as
well. Just as expected, when central banks attack debt investors they
gradually forsake losing bonds and migrate into gold.
While researching real rates, I try to
use the most-conservative-possible measures. While this really understates the bullish case for
gold, it is much easier for mainstream investors to accept and very easy for
contrarians to defend. Since most interest rates are still driven by the
free markets despite all of Washington’s incessant socialist meddling,
the inflation measure used is where conservatism comes into play.
Wall Street believes the US government’s Consumer Price Index is an accurate measure of inflation. Everyone
accepts the CPI as gospel, so I’ve always used it in this research
thread. Since inflation is truly defined as monetary growth, the growth rates
in the money supplies are a far-superior measure. With the Fed running its
printing presses like there is no tomorrow, relatively more money is chasing
relatively less goods and services which drives up nominal prices.
Over the past year, the broad MZM
money supply in the US has grown by 9.9%! This is much closer to true
inflation than the CPI’s modest 3.7% gain. For a variety of reasons
including inflation-indexed welfare payments as well as inflationary perceptions’ impact on the
financial markets, the government statisticians intentionally lowball the CPI
via mathematical wizardry. It is really a garbage indicator, but to most
market participants the CPI is
inflation. So I use it to be conservative, which really understates the case
for gold.
To compute real rates, you simply take
the nominal rate of return and subtract annual inflation growth. The
purest and most-conservative interest rate to use is the yield on the 1-year
US Treasury Bill. All over the world, short-term US Treasuries are considered
“risk-free” investments that are the foundation for interest
rates. Since Washington can create infinite fiat US dollars out of thin air
to pay Treasury investors, there is really no risk of default unless a
rebellion or invasion takes out Washington.
Also on real-rates analysis, synching
up the time periods is crucial. Since interest rates are typically thought of
in annual terms, a 1-year span is ideal. And 1y T-bill yields match up
perfectly with the year-over-year change in the CPI. So 1y T-bill yields
minus the YoY CPI growth equals real interest rates. Comparing these to gold
over strategic time spans is very interesting.
In these charts, 1y T-bill yields are
rendered in black. The YoY CPI change, which is only published once a month
and hence looks stair-steppy, is drawn in white. The difference between this
nominal yield and inflation is the real rate shown in blue. Finally gold
is superimposed over the top of all this interest-rate data in red. As
you’ll see, low and negative real rates are very bullish for gold.
It always strikes me as ironic. Manipulation
theorists spend endless hours railing about perceived manipulation in tiny
subsets of the financial markets. But the biggest manipulation of all is out
in the open. Like the old Soviet Politburo, the unconstitutional
Federal Reserve meets in secret to set the price for money traded among
banks. If the Fed was abolished as it should be, and overnight rates
operated in a truly free market, the entire financial system would be
infinitely more sound than it is today.
In real-rates analysis, we have to
start with nominal interest rates. And the shorter the term of a debt
instrument, the more the Fed’s heavy-handed manipulation influences its
yields. 3m Treasuries usually trade in lockstep with the Fed’s target
overnight bank rate (fed funds), while 30y Treasuries largely ignore it. Since
1y Treasuries are relatively short on this time scale, they are heavily
influenced by Fed manipulations.
The black 1y Treasury yield line above
looks very similar to the Fed’s fed-funds-rate target. Since the
Fed dominates the short end of the yield curve, it also dominates real rates.
When the Fed drives its own interest rates to artificially-low levels, 1y
T-bill yields follow. And if these nominal returns fall below the rate of
headline inflation growth, all of a sudden debt investors are losing
purchasing power by investing.
Back in 2000, Treasury yields were
reasonable near 6%. Investors earned a fair return on their precious capital
while debtors paid a fair rate to borrow it, above inflation on both fronts. But
in early 2001, the healthy post-tech-stock-bubble
bear spooked Alan Greenspan into sowing the seeds for today’s calamity.
To try and reinflate a stock bubble, the Fed drove nominal rates down to
inflation rates so real rates fell to zero.
Note above that gold was languishing,
consolidating after a multi-decade bear, until real rates fell decisively
under 1%. And gold really didn’t start accelerating until real rates
went negative in 2002. Negative real rates drive investment demand for
gold because bonds become unattractive. Investor preference gradually
switches to gold, which will keep pace with inflation, instead of falling
behind in under-yielding bonds.
Of course the Fed’s monetary
inflation never goes where the Fed wants it to. In trying to reinflate the
stock markets, Greenspan instead ignited the housing bubble. Its terrible
aftermath is apparent today. Never learning any lessons from history, the Fed
is doing the same thing today that it did in the early 2000s. It just forced
nominal rates down near 1% again to attempt to reinflate the housing bubble. Of
course this new monetary inflation will go elsewhere to.
Between 2001 and 2006, with real rates
at +1% or lower, gold thrived. It wasn’t until real rates decisively
headed over 1% again in mid-2006 that gold finally stopped advancing to
consolidate. But as soon as the Fed panicked again in late 2007 and started
slashing rates, real rates plummeted. Not surprisingly, gold simultaneously
soared. More and more bond investors grew discouraged by the Fed’s
attack on them and bought gold.
Now realize there are many short-term
forces acting on gold, such as the US dollar’s behavior, general
commodities trends, and overall financial-market sentiment. So there are many
short-term places in this chart where gold and real rates are not tightly
correlated. But if you filter out technical noise and examine this decade as
a whole, it is crystal clear that gold has been very strong during a time of
low and negative real rates. They spark big gold investment demand.
In late 2007 real rates plunged
negative again as Ben Bernanke failed to learn the lessons from Alan
Greenspan’s disastrous easy-money inflationary orgy. By early 2008 they
were -2%, the lowest levels seen in decades. Naturally gold was rocketing
higher and headed above $1000 by March. And while gold did get caught up in
the brutal commodities correction and global stock panic since, it remains
near nice high levels in the context of its secular bull.
And check out real rates in the last 6
months or so. They have been -2% at best, falling to under -3% at times to
their lowest levels since summer 1980! This is incredibly bullish for gold. Once the stock panic fades
and the dollar-buying frenzy abates, fundamentals will again drive gold. And
a negative-real-rate monetary environment hostile to bond investors is the
most-bullish-possible environment for gold.
History is very clear in illustrating
this fact, which we’ll get to shortly here. But first consider the
likely future course for real rates. CPI inflation growth is in a clear
uptrend as rendered above. While prices for many things plunged during the
panic of October and November 2008, prices will quickly stabilize as fear
evaporates. So odds are this CPI uptrend will continue. With the Fed’s
incredible monetary growth, 10% in MZM compared to 0% growth in the US economy, higher general prices are absolutely inevitable.
And if CPI inflation remains at 4%+,
heck even 3%+, real rates will stay negative. Failure is an important part of
capitalism as it moves assets from incompetent managers to competent managers
to keep the economy fresh and vibrant. But for some reason, those traitorous
scum in Washington have decided no one should fail. They are hellbent
on keeping interest rates artificially low forever if necessary so failed
companies and managers can sit on and lock up stagnating assets. Karl Marx
would be very proud.
Imagine what would happen if the Fed
actually had the courage to quadruple
interest rates to make the bond markets mutually beneficial to both investors
and debtors again. Overextended debtors would actually fail! Oh the horror!
Until nominal rates get up to the 4%+ range again, real rates will remain
negative. And I can’t see any way our cowardly Fed can raise rates
substantially for a long time to come.
With a brutally negative real-rate
environment here now and likely to persist for years, the monetary case for
gold is exceedingly bullish. If bond investors can’t earn a real return
after inflation for the risks they take, they will be much better off holding
gold. Sure, it doesn’t pay a yield. But bonds really
don’t pay much today either. And unlike bond yields, gold will
rise to keep pace with monetary inflation. Investors’ purchasing
power will be preserved.
All these monetary truths are readily
apparent now, proved again in this past decade. But in mid-2001 when I
started this thread of research, all we had to rely upon was history. Looking
at gold and real rates since 1970 is fascinating. This chart is similar to
the prior one except the gold price is adjusted for CPI inflation. Negative
real rates helped drive the famous 1970s gold bull, which was far larger than
today’s so far.
Once again, there are a myriad of
short-term factors that affect the gold price. So if you look closely, you
can find short-term exceptions to the negative-real-rates-are-great-for-gold
rule. But if you carefully consider this chart as a whole, the strategic
implications of negative real rates become very apparent. In a secular sense
gold does best when real rates are low or negative, and worst when they are
healthy.
The 1970s was a time of inflation
exceeding the nominal returns available on bonds. So debt investors, acting
totally rationally, gradually shifted capital into gold. These investors
drove a strong gold bull that speculators ultimately flooded into at the very
end, igniting a legendary gold bubble. While the monthly data in this chart
doesn’t show the daily high, in today’s 2008 dollars gold
approached $2400 an ounce in January 1980! Today’s gold bull
isn’t even close to seeing a similar blowoff top yet.
That 1970s gold bull only ended when
Paul Volcker courageously hiked short-term interest rates dramatically until
real rates shot positive to healthy levels again. With excellent 4% to 8%
real returns available in bonds, investment demand for gold collapsed. And it
didn’t reignite again until decades later when real rates finally
threatened to once more plunge decisively negative.
By foolishly deciding to bail out
speculators in the housing bubble, including highly-leveraged banks and
highly-leveraged house “owners”, the Fed has trapped
itself. Interest rates are way too low, they do not offer realistic
returns for bond investors. Yet if the Fed raises rates to more
rational levels, the speculators it is trying to bail out are going to fail. While
healthy over the long term, this is apparently unacceptable politically.
As long as the Fed strong-arms nominal
rates to levels under headline inflation, real rates are going to remain
negative. Instead of sitting in bonds and losing real purchasing power year
after year, increasing numbers of bond investors are going to park capital in
gold to protect it from all this monetary inflation. Even though gold
doesn’t pay a yield, as long as it merely paces inflation it is a much
better investment than bonds lagging behind inflation.
This argument certainly isn’t
new today. Back in 2001, the coming negative real rates were one of the main
fundamental reasons I recommended our subscribers buy physical gold coins for
core long-term investments. When the price of money isn’t set by the
free markets, when it isn’t mutually
beneficial and robs from investors to subsidize debtors, investors gradually
pull out of the debt markets.
In July 2001 I opened my first essay
in this series with a 1993 quotation from a Federal Reserve official. He
said, “The Fed’s attempts to stimulate the economy during the
1970s through what amounted to a policy of extremely low real interest rates
led to steadily rising inflation that was finally checked at great cost
during the 1980s.” Sounds like today, no? Bernanke is doing
the same thing done in the
1970s, and his endless easy money will ultimately lead to the same result,
massive inflation.
Of course gold is the ultimate asset
in highly inflationary times. And the unfathomable quantity of fiat-paper
dollars the Fed is creating out of thin air to force-feed into the financial
system these days is going to eventually manifest itself in tremendous
inflation. This will drive great investment demand in gold and lead to
gold’s gains not only pacing inflation, but far exceeding it as more
and more investors buy.
Gold didn’t look great in the
last few months, I agree. But don’t let technical and sentiment
anomalies cloud your perceptions of secular fundamental realities. Today’s
negative-real-rate environment courtesy of the Fed is the
most-bullish-possible monetary environment for gold. Thus at Zeal we have
been adding gold and gold-stock positions lately despite all the carnage. Contrarians
buy when no one else wants to.
If you are wondering what to do with
your capital after weathering the worst of the stock panic, the gold realm is
a great place to put a sizeable chunk of it. I don’t know of any
more-bullish asset class in today’s environment. I am more excited
about gold today than I was in early 2001 before it quadrupled. To learn
about and navigate these treacherous markets, and thrive as this panic
abates, subscribe today to our acclaimed
monthly newsletter.
The bottom line is negative real rates
are one of gold’s most powerful fundamental drivers. And thanks to the
Fed refusing to let housing speculators fail as they should, negative real
rates are going to persist for a long time to come. Maybe years. But
bond investors are not dumb. They won’t invest for long in an
environment where their capital is guaranteed to lose real purchasing
power. Some will migrate into gold.
Negative real rates were the monetary
foundation of the biggest secular gold bulls in modern history, the 1970s and
the 2000s. And just as it took radically high 6%+ real rates to end that
1970s gold bull, this bull isn’t likely to end until we see sustained hugely positive real rates
as well. In the meantime, gold will continue to thrive on balance
despite big pullbacks from time to time driven by capricious sentiment.
Adam Hamilton, CPA
Zealllc.com
November 21, 2008
So how can you profit from this
information? We publish an acclaimed monthly newsletter, Zeal
Intelligence, that details exactly what we
are doing in terms of actual stock and options trading based on all the
lessons we have learned in our market research. Please consider joining
us each month for tactical trading details and more in our premium Zeal
Intelligence service at … www.zealllc.com/subscribe.htm
Questions for Adam? I
would be more than happy to address them through my private consulting
business. Please visit www.zealllc.com/adam.htm for more information.
Thoughts, comments, or
flames? Fire away at zelotes@zealllc.com. Due to my
staggering and perpetually increasing e-mail load, I regret that I am not
able to respond to comments personally. I will read all messages though
and really appreciate your feedback!
Copyright 2000 - 2006 Zeal
Research (www.ZealLLC.com)
|