|
David
Reilly at BusinessWeek takes dead aim at Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and
the New York Fed in Secret Banking
Cabal Emerges From AIG Shadows.
The
idea of secret banking cabals that control the country and global economy are
a given among conspiracy theorists who stockpile ammo, bottled water and
peanut butter. Wednesday’s hearing described a secretive group
deploying billions of dollars to favored banks, operating with little
oversight by the public or elected officials.
We’re talking about the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, whose role as
the most influential part of the federal-reserve system -- apart from the
matter of AIG’s bailout -- deserves further congressional scrutiny.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was head of the New York Fed at the time
of the AIG moves. The hearing before the House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform also focused on what many in Congress believe was the New
York Fed’s subsequent attempt to cover up buyout details and who
benefited.
By pursuing this line of inquiry, the hearing revealed some of the inner
workings of the New York Fed and the outsized role it plays in banking. This
insight is especially valuable given that the New York Fed is a quasi-governmental
institution that isn’t subject to citizen intrusions such as freedom of
information requests, unlike the Federal Reserve.
This impenetrability comes in handy since the bank is the preferred vehicle
for many of the Fed’s bailout programs. It’s as though the New
York Fed was a black-ops outfit for the nation’s central bank.
As Representative Marcy Kaptur told Geithner at the hearing: “A lot of
people think that the president of the New York Fed works for the U.S.
government. But in fact you work for the private banks that elected
you.”
Let’s take Geithner at his word that a failure to resolve the
insurer’s default swaps would have led to financial Armageddon. Given
the stakes, you might think Geithner would have coordinated actions with
then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. Yet Paulson testified that he
wasn’t in the loop.
“I had no involvement at all, in the payment to the counterparties, no
involvement whatsoever,” Paulson said.
Fed Chairman Bernanke also wasn’t involved. In a written response to
questions from Representative Darrell Issa, Bernanke said he “was not
directly involved in the negotiations” with AIG’s counterparty
banks.
Geither said he recused himself from the bank’s day-to-day activities,
even though he never actually signed a formal letter of recusal.
New York Fed staff and outside lawyers from Davis Polk & Wardell edited
AIG communications to investors and intervened with the Securities and
Exchange Commission to shield details about the buyout transactions,
according to a report by Issa.
That the New York Fed, a quasi-governmental body, was able to push around the
SEC, an executive-branch agency, deserves a congressional hearing all by
itself.
Later, when it became clear information would be disclosed, New York Fed
legal group staffer James Bergin e-mailed colleagues saying: “I have to
think this train is probably going to leave the station soon and we need to
focus our efforts on explaining the story as best we can. There were too many
people involved in the deals -- too many counterparties, too many lawyers and
advisors, too many people from AIG -- to keep a determined Congress from the
information.”
Think of the enormity of that statement. A staffer at a body with little
public accountability and that exists to serve bankers is lamenting the
inability to keep Congress in the dark.
Most
know I am not a big believer in conspiracies. I regularly dismiss them.
However, this one was clear from the beginning and like all massive
conspiracies, it is now in the light of day.
I have talked about conspiracies involving Geithner, Paulson, Bernanke, and
former Bank of America Lewis on many occasions. I am more than happy to add
another post to the list.
April 24, 2009: Let the Criminal
Indictments Begin: Paulson, Bernanke, Lewis
June 26, 2009: Bernanke Suffers
From Selective Memory Loss; Paulson Calls Bank of America "Turd in the
Punchbowl"
July 17, 2009: Paulson Admits Coercion;
Where are the Indictments?
October 20, 2009: Bernanke Guilty of
Coercion and Market Manipulation
January 07, 2010: Time To Indict
Geithner For Securities Fraud
January 26, 2010: Questions Geithner
Cannot Escape
I am quite sure there will be more opportunities to add to the list.
Strange Conspiracy Involving No One
·
Geithner
recused himself although there is no record of it.
·
Paulson
knows nothing about it and was not in the loop
·
Bernanke
either does not remember and/or was not involved.
Amazingly this conspiracy involves no one. It is a historic event. Hundred
billion dollar bailout decisions just happened. No one made them, no one was
responsible for them, and no one was in the loop, yet all those not involved
agree the process must be kept secret.
David Reilly: "Think of the enormity of that statement. A staffer at
a body with little public accountability and that exists to serve bankers is
lamenting the inability to keep Congress in the dark."
In the wake of these happenings, David Andolfatto at the St. Louis Fed just
happened to step out of the blue right on time making a mathematical plea defending
secrecy: In Defense Of
Secrecy; Three Prong Attack On The Fed; Selective Myopia .
Steve Keen, a real economist, disputes the thesis as did others. Please see Steve Keen on
Banking Secrets and Fed Transparency for a detailed
rebuttal of the thesis.
Juts the other day, I received an email from David Andolfatto, the author
"On the Social Cost of Transparency in Monetary Economies", the
article praising secrecy, offering to explain the thesis in plain English. I
will take him up on it.
However, I think anyone with any common sense has had more than enough of
secret backroom deals, especially those that somehow no one makes.
Mish
GlobalEconomicAnalysis.blogspot.com
To
sign up for a free copy of Sitka’s Monthly Client Newsletter,
please register your email address at the bottom of the Sitka Pacific Commentary Page.
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Thoughts
on the great inflation/deflation/stagflation debate as well as discussions on
gold, silver, currencies, interest rates, and policy decisions that affect
the global markets.
|
|