In August of 2004, when Silver was $6 and Gold was
$380 I wrote the 4 reasons for liking silver more than gold.
- Supply and demand
Mine production could not satisfy physical demands
of either gold or silver. However, I like silver better because most official
sectors, such as the US
government, have run out of silver. Only governments do nutty things like
selling a valuable asset to suppress its price. I trust the private
enterprises holding silver stockpiles to be logical (i.e. profit-seeking)
participants in the silver market. If Mr. David Morgan were right that China
provided most of the silver to fulfill the demand
for the last few years, then the silver picture would just get more bullish. I
expect China
in a year or two will be a net silver importer (if it has not already), just
like soybeans, copper, steel, and any other commodity you can think of.
- Commercial position
Every short position has to be covered. The silver
commercials at times are net short an entire year of silver mine production. The
situation for gold is much less severe. If any COMEX market has a chance of
blowing up, silver is it.
- Consumed vs Stored
There is a lot of gold above ground to go around. But
for silver, once it goes into that laptop or fridge, it is gone. Silver has a
chance to repeat what palladium did in 2000 (when it raced from $350/oz to
over $1,000/oz in 12 months).
- Speculative/public interests
Thanks to Ted Butler, David Morgan, and Gata, I think a number of people with $billions are
watching silver. Tech funds are not all that stupid. Now that they have been
burned a few times, they will figure out a way to beat the commercial shorts.
And the way to do it is quite easy as Buffet did it in 1997: accumulate the
physical and make it known after the fact.
Back in 2004, silver bears pointed to three things:
- Unknown quantity of existing stockpiles
They say there is a lot of Indian silver to go
around. Well, obviously not at $5/oz or the US government will not have run
out of silver last year. The least we can say is that existing silver owners
expect to release their inventories at a price above $5/oz.
- Silver is bulky
That has to be the lamest excuse. Storage fee
amounts to no more than 2% a year. In 1998, I did not hear mutual fund
investors complain about the 5% front sales load when they received
double-digit returns.
- Silver is an industrial metal and not an
investment
Well for me, anything that goes up in price is a
good investment. In the past month, silver handily outperformed gold,
platinum, and palladium. That sounds like a good investment to me.
I continue to hear arguments on gold vs silver. Most of them are personal opinions. Some
analysts pointed to how much more silver is produced over gold (600 million
oz vs 80 million oz). Well by that logic. palladium with 4-million-oz of annual production, should
be trading at well over USD $1000/oz+.
Other analysts pointed out some historic data and
concluded that gold will outperform silver. I let the market do the talking.
Both silver and silver shares have performed better than gold and gold shares
this year. There is a gold equivalent of SSRI and it is called VGZ and it
sells at 1/10 of SSRI's market capitalization. This
shows how much premium silver shares command in the market over their gold
counterparts. In today's world, where paper money far out-supplied any metal
at current prices, fundamental physical supply and demand of the metal itself
is really irrelevant. Simply put, people will be voting with their papers.
The scenario will go like this - a $1 billion hedge
fund makes $200 million from gold futures, reads about silver, decides to put
$100million in silver and instantly bumps the silver price by $2/oz. Others
read the tapes and follow - the bull becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Coupled
with that, apparently no-one can go to the physical market and dump 100
million oz of silver to cool the fire makes silver a no-risk bet.
Update: Today
- Stated government sale has not decreased
Official Government sales according to the world
silver survey have not decreased since 2004.
World Silver
Supply and Demand
(in millions of ounces)
|
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
Supply
|
Mine Production
|
520.0
|
542.1
|
556.8
|
590.9
|
606.2
|
593.8
|
600.7
|
622.2
|
645.7
|
646.1
|
Net Government Sales
|
--
|
33.5
|
97.2
|
60.3
|
63.0
|
59.2
|
88.7
|
61.9
|
65.9
|
77.7
|
Old Silver Scrap
|
169.3
|
193.9
|
181.6
|
180.7
|
182.7
|
187.5
|
184.0
|
181.5
|
186.4
|
188.0
|
Producer Hedging
|
68.1
|
6.5
|
--
|
--
|
18.9
|
--
|
--
|
9.6
|
27.6
|
--
|
Implied Net Disinvestment
|
78.9
|
45.2
|
42.0
|
83.5
|
--
|
8.3
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Total Supply
|
836.3
|
821.2
|
877.5
|
915.4
|
870.8
|
848.7
|
873.4
|
875.2
|
925.6
|
911.8
|
|
Demand
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Applications
|
319.5
|
313.2
|
336.1
|
371.3
|
332.4
|
336.5
|
346.8
|
364.2
|
405.8
|
430.0
|
Photography
|
217.4
|
225.4
|
227.9
|
218.3
|
213.1
|
204.3
|
192.9
|
181.0
|
162.1
|
145.8
|
Jewelry
|
150.6
|
140.6
|
159.8
|
170.6
|
174.3
|
168.9
|
179.2
|
174.8
|
173.8
|
165.8
|
Silverware
|
117.7
|
114.2
|
108.6
|
95.6
|
105.2
|
82.6
|
83.0
|
66.2
|
66.6
|
59.1
|
Coins & Medals
|
30.4
|
27.8
|
29.1
|
32.1
|
30.5
|
31.6
|
35.6
|
42.4
|
40.0
|
39.8
|
Total Fabrication
|
835.6
|
821.2
|
861.5
|
888.0
|
855.4
|
823.9
|
837.4
|
828.6
|
848.3
|
840.5
|
Net Government Purchases
|
0.7
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Producer De-Hedging
|
--
|
--
|
16.0
|
27.4
|
--
|
24.8
|
20.9
|
--
|
--
|
6.8
|
Implied Net Investment
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
15.4
|
--
|
15.0
|
46.6
|
77.2
|
64.5
|
Total Demand
|
836.3
|
821.2
|
877.5
|
915.4
|
870.8
|
848.7
|
873.4
|
875.2
|
925.6
|
911.8
|
|
Silver Price
(London
US$/oz)
|
4.897
|
5.544
|
5.220
|
4.951
|
4.370
|
4.599
|
4.879
|
6.658
|
7.312
|
11.549
|
SOURCE: World
Silver Survey 2007
|
In 2004, silver's established firm bottom around the
same time the US Treasury ran out of silver may be a pure coincidence. Or
maybe:
1. Other governments demanded a better price for
their silver than the US
government causing the silver price to rise despite persistence government
sales.
2. The well advertised fact of the depleting US
treasury silver inventory might have triggered more net implied investment
demand, up from 15 million oz in 2003 to over 70 million oz in 2005.
- Commercials short position is bigger than ever
Commercials piled on 100,000+ short contracts in
2004, now it is at 140,000+. That is 500 million oz before vs 700 million now. How does one explain more shorts with
a rising silver price? Perhaps the day of reckoning of massive short covering
is to come? Or perhaps there is no real correlation between silver shorts and
the silver price?
- Implied Net Investment Demand Grew
While net investment demand grew in 2005 and 2006,
it still accounted for less than 10% of total physical demand. One should
take such figure from World Silver Survey with a grain of salt. As no one
truly knows how much physical silver changed hand privately.
Conclusion
In today's world, where paper money far out-supplies
of any metal at current prices, fundamental physical supply and demand of the
metal itself is really irrelevant. Simply put, people will be voting with
their papers.
The case applies to silver, gold, grain, oil, and
any commodity. After all, how can one blame the tripling of wheat prices in
the past 12 months on China?
Did all of 1.3 billion Chinese changed their diet habit and switched to bread
overnight?
People vote with their papers. The Commitment of
Traders Report shows today's positions have grown by 20%+ for silver (200
million oz) since 2004. There was a strong investment demand to counter the
dealer shorts. 200 million oz is merely $4 billion with present invest-able
dollars, measured at tens of $trillion (if not over $100 trillion). Any
micro-analysis based on today's silver stats does not carry much
significance.
Since August of 2004, Gold has gone up 250% from
$380/oz to $950/oz, while silver has gone up 300% from $6 to $18.5. As the 4
pro-silver reasons I outlined in the article begin to further manifest
themselves, the percentage of performance difference to date will be seen as
negligible compared to what's to come.
By :
John Lee, CFA
Goldmau.com
John Lee is a portfolio manager at
Mau Capital Management. He is a
CFA charter holder and has degrees in Economics and Engineering from Rice University.
He previously studied under Mr. James Turk, a renowned authority
on the gold market, and is specialized in investing in junior gold and
resource companies. Mr. Lee's articles are frequently cited at major resource
websites and a esteemed speaker at several major
resource conferences.
Please visit www.GoldMau for instant market alerts and stock updates.
|