In
August of 2004, when Silver was $6 and Gold was $380 I wrote the 4 reasons
for liking silver more than gold.
-
Supply and demand –
Mine production could not
satisfy physical demands of either gold or silver. However, I like silver
better because most official sectors, such as the US government, have run out of
silver. Only governments do nutty things like selling a valuable asset to
suppress its price. I trust the private enterprises holding silver stockpiles
to be logical (i.e. profit-seeking) participants in the silver market. If Mr.
David Morgan were right that China
provided most of the silver to fulfill the demand
for the last few years, then the silver picture would just get more bullish. I
expect China
in a year or two will be a net silver importer (if it has not already), just
like soybeans, copper, steel, and any other commodity you can think of.
-
Commercial position –
Every short position has to
be covered. The silver commercials at times are net short an entire year of
silver mine production. The situation for gold is much less severe. If any
COMEX market has a chance of blowing up, silver is it.
-
Consumed vs Stored –
There is a lot of gold
above ground to go around. But for silver, once it goes into that laptop or
fridge, it is gone. Silver has a chance to repeat what palladium did in 2000
(when it raced from $350/oz to over $1,000/oz in 12 months).
-
Speculative/public interests –
Thanks to Ted Butler, David
Morgan, and Gata, I think a number of people with
$billions are watching silver. Tech funds are not all that stupid. Now that
they have been burned a few times, they will figure out a way to beat the
commercial shorts. And the way to do it is quite easy as Buffet did it in
1997: accumulate the physical and make it known after the fact.
Back
in 2004, silver bears pointed to three things:
-
Unknown quantity of existing stockpiles –
They say there is a lot of
Indian silver to go around. Well, obviously not at $5/oz or the US government
will not have run out of silver last year. The least we can say is that
existing silver owners expect to release their inventories at a price above
$5/oz.
-
Silver is bulky –
That has to be the lamest
excuse. Storage fee amounts to no more than 2% a year. In 1998, I did not
hear mutual fund investors complain about the 5% front sales load when they
received double-digit returns.
-
Silver is an industrial metal and not an investment-
Well for me, anything that goes
up in price is a good investment. In the past month, silver handily
outperformed gold, platinum, and palladium. That sounds like a good
investment to me.
I continue to hear
arguments on gold vs silver. Most of them are
personal opinions. Some analysts pointed to how much more silver is produced
over gold (600 million oz vs 80 million oz). Well
by that logic. palladium with 4-million-oz of annual
production, should be trading at well over USD $1000/oz+.
Other analysts pointed out
some historic data and concluded that gold will outperform silver. I let the
market do the talking. Both silver and silver shares have performed better
than gold and gold shares this year. In today’s world, where paper
money far out-supplied any metal at current prices, fundamental physical
supply and demand of the metal itself is really irrelevant. Simply put,
people will be voting with their papers.
The scenario will go like
this - a $1 billion hedge fund makes $200 million from gold futures, reads
about silver, decides to put $100million in silver and instantly bumps the
silver price by $2/oz. Others read the tapes and follow - the bull becomes a
self-fulfilling prophecy. Coupled with that, apparently no-one can go to the
physical market and dump 100 million oz of silver to cool the fire makes
silver a no-risk bet.
Update:
Today
-
Stated government sale has not decreased-
Official Government sales
according to the world silver survey have not decreased since 2004.
World Silver Supply and
Demand
(in millions of ounces)
|
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine Production
|
520.0
|
542.1
|
556.8
|
590.9
|
606.2
|
593.8
|
600.7
|
622.2
|
645.7
|
646.1
|
Net Government Sales
|
--
|
33.5
|
97.2
|
60.3
|
63.0
|
59.2
|
88.7
|
61.9
|
65.9
|
77.7
|
Old
Silver Scrap
|
169.3
|
193.9
|
181.6
|
180.7
|
182.7
|
187.5
|
184.0
|
181.5
|
186.4
|
188.0
|
Producer Hedging
|
68.1
|
6.5
|
--
|
--
|
18.9
|
--
|
--
|
9.6
|
27.6
|
--
|
Implied Net Disinvestment
|
78.9
|
45.2
|
42.0
|
83.5
|
--
|
8.3
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Total Supply
|
836.3
|
821.2
|
877.5
|
915.4
|
870.8
|
848.7
|
873.4
|
875.2
|
925.6
|
911.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Applications
|
319.5
|
313.2
|
336.1
|
371.3
|
332.4
|
336.5
|
346.8
|
364.2
|
405.8
|
430.0
|
Photography
|
217.4
|
225.4
|
227.9
|
218.3
|
213.1
|
204.3
|
192.9
|
181.0
|
162.1
|
145.8
|
Jewelry
|
150.6
|
140.6
|
159.8
|
170.6
|
174.3
|
168.9
|
179.2
|
174.8
|
173.8
|
165.8
|
Silverware
|
117.7
|
114.2
|
108.6
|
95.6
|
105.2
|
82.6
|
83.0
|
66.2
|
66.6
|
59.1
|
Coins & Medals
|
30.4
|
27.8
|
29.1
|
32.1
|
30.5
|
31.6
|
35.6
|
42.4
|
40.0
|
39.8
|
Total Fabrication
|
835.6
|
821.2
|
861.5
|
888.0
|
855.4
|
823.9
|
837.4
|
828.6
|
848.3
|
840.5
|
Net Government Purchases
|
0.7
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Producer De-Hedging
|
--
|
--
|
16.0
|
27.4
|
--
|
24.8
|
20.9
|
--
|
--
|
6.8
|
Implied Net Investment
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
15.4
|
--
|
15.0
|
46.6
|
77.2
|
64.5
|
Total Demand
|
836.3
|
821.2
|
877.5
|
915.4
|
870.8
|
848.7
|
873.4
|
875.2
|
925.6
|
911.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver Price
(London
US$/oz)
|
4.897
|
5.544
|
5.220
|
4.951
|
4.370
|
4.599
|
4.879
|
6.658
|
7.312
|
11.549
|
SOURCE: World Silver Survey 2007
|
In 2004, silver’s
established firm bottom around the same time the US Treasury ran out of
silver may be a pure coincidence. Or maybe:
- Other governments demanded a better price for
their silver than the US
government causing the silver price to rise despite persistence
government sales.
- The well advertised fact of the depleting US
treasury silver inventory might have triggered more net implied
investment demand, up from 15 million oz in 2003 to over 70 million oz
in 2005.
-
Commercials short position is bigger than ever
Commercials piled on
100,000+ short contracts in 2004, now it is at 140,000+. That is 500 million
oz before vs 700 million now. How does one explain
more shorts with a rising silver price? Perhaps the day of reckoning of
massive short covering is to come? Or perhaps there is no real correlation
between silver shorts and the silver price?
-
Implied Net Investment Demand Grew
While net investment demand
grew in 2005 and 2006, it still accounted for less than 10% of total physical
demand. One should take such figure from World Silver Survey with a grain of
salt. As no one truly knows how much physical silver changed hand privately.
Conclusion
In today’s world,
where paper money far out-supplies of any metal at current prices,
fundamental physical supply and demand of the metal itself is really
irrelevant. Simply put, people will be voting with their papers.
The case applies to silver,
gold, grain, oil, and any commodity. After all, how can one blame the
tripling of wheat prices in the past 12 months on China? Did all of 1.3 billion
Chinese changed their diet habit and switched to bread overnight?
People vote with their
papers. The Commitment of Traders Report shows today’s positions have
grown by 20%+ for silver (200 million oz) since 2004. There was a strong
investment demand to counter the dealer shorts. 200 million oz is merely $4
billion with present invest-able dollars, measured at tens of $trillion (if
not over $100 trillion). Any micro-analysis based on today’s silver
stats does not carry much significance.
Since August of 2004, Gold
has gone up 250% from $380/oz to $950/oz, while silver has gone up 300% from
$6 to $18.5. As the 4 pro-silver reasons I outlined in the article begin to
further manifest themselves, the percentage of performance difference to date
will be seen as negligible compared to what’s to come.
By :
John Lee, CFA
Goldmau.com
John Lee is a portfolio manager at
Mau Capital Management. He is a
CFA charter holder and has degrees in Economics and Engineering from Rice University.
He previously studied under Mr. James Turk, a renowned authority
on the gold market, and is specialized in investing in junior gold and resource
companies. Mr. Lee's articles are frequently cited at major resource websites
and a esteemed speaker at several major resource
conferences.
Please visit www.GoldMau for instant market alerts and stock updates.
|