In August of 2004, when
Silver was $6 and Gold was $380 I wrote the 4 reasons for liking silver more
than gold.
- Supply and demand
Mine production could not
satisfy physical demands of either gold or silver. However, I like silver
better because most official sectors, such as the US government, have run out
of silver. Only governments do nutty things like selling a valuable asset to
suppress its price. I trust the private enterprises holding silver stockpiles
to be logical (i.e. profit-seeking) participants in the silver market. If Mr.
David Morgan were right that China provided most of the silver to fulfill the
demand for the last few years, then the silver picture would just get more
bullish. I expect China in a year or two will be a net silver importer (if it
has not already), just like soybeans, copper, steel, and any other commodity
you can think of.
- Commercial position
Every short position has to be
covered. The silver commercials at times are net short an entire year of
silver mine production. The situation for gold is much less severe. If any
COMEX market has a chance of blowing up, silver is it.
- Consumed vs Stored
There is a lot of gold above
ground to go around. But for silver, once it goes into that laptop or fridge,
it is gone. Silver has a chance to repeat what palladium did in 2000 (when it
raced from $350/oz to over $1,000/oz in 12 months).
- Speculative/public
interests
Thanks to Ted Butler, David
Morgan, and Gata, I think a number of people with $billions are watching
silver. Tech funds are not all that stupid. Now that they have been burned a
few times, they will figure out a way to beat the commercial shorts. And the
way to do it is quite easy as Buffet did it in 1997: accumulate the physical
and make it known after the fact.
Back in 2004, silver bears
pointed to three things:
- Unknown quantity of
existing stockpiles
They say there is a lot of
Indian silver to go around. Well, obviously not at $5/oz or the US government
will not have run out of silver last year. The least we can say is that
existing silver owners expect to release their inventories at a price above
$5/oz.
- Silver is bulky
That has to be the lamest excuse.
Storage fee amounts to no more than 2% a year. In 1998, I did not hear mutual
fund investors complain about the 5% front sales load when they received
double-digit returns.
- Silver is an industrial
metal and not an investment
Well for me, anything that
goes up in price is a good investment. In the past month, silver handily
outperformed gold, platinum, and palladium. That sounds like a good
investment to me.
I continue to hear arguments
on gold vs silver. Most of them are personal opinions. Some analysts pointed
to how much more silver is produced over gold (600 million oz vs 80 million
oz). Well by that logic. palladium with 4-million-oz of annual production,
should be trading at well over USD $1000/oz+.
Other analysts pointed out
some historic data and concluded that gold will outperform silver. I let the
market do the talking. Both silver and silver shares have performed better
than gold and gold shares this year. There is a gold equivalent of SSRI and
it is called VGZ and it sells at 1/10 of SSRI's market capitalization. This
shows how much premium silver shares command in the market over their gold
counterparts. In today's world, where paper money far out-supplied any metal
at current prices, fundamental physical supply and demand of the metal itself
is really irrelevant. Simply put, people will be voting with their papers.
The scenario will go like this
- a $1 billion hedge fund makes $200 million from gold futures, reads about
silver, decides to put $100million in silver and instantly bumps the silver
price by $2/oz. Others read the tapes and follow - the bull becomes a
self-fulfilling prophecy. Coupled with that, apparently no-one can go to the
physical market and dump 100 million oz of silver to cool the fire makes
silver a no-risk bet.
Update: Today
- Stated government sale
has not decreased
Official Government sales
according to the world silver survey have not decreased since 2004.
World
Silver Supply and Demand
(in millions of ounces)
|
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
Supply
|
Mine
Production
|
520.0
|
542.1
|
556.8
|
590.9
|
606.2
|
593.8
|
600.7
|
622.2
|
645.7
|
646.1
|
Net
Government Sales
|
--
|
33.5
|
97.2
|
60.3
|
63.0
|
59.2
|
88.7
|
61.9
|
65.9
|
77.7
|
Old Silver
Scrap
|
169.3
|
193.9
|
181.6
|
180.7
|
182.7
|
187.5
|
184.0
|
181.5
|
186.4
|
188.0
|
Producer
Hedging
|
68.1
|
6.5
|
--
|
--
|
18.9
|
--
|
--
|
9.6
|
27.6
|
--
|
Implied Net
Disinvestment
|
78.9
|
45.2
|
42.0
|
83.5
|
--
|
8.3
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Total
Supply
|
836.3
|
821.2
|
877.5
|
915.4
|
870.8
|
848.7
|
873.4
|
875.2
|
925.6
|
911.8
|
|
Demand
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
Applications
|
319.5
|
313.2
|
336.1
|
371.3
|
332.4
|
336.5
|
346.8
|
364.2
|
405.8
|
430.0
|
Photography
|
217.4
|
225.4
|
227.9
|
218.3
|
213.1
|
204.3
|
192.9
|
181.0
|
162.1
|
145.8
|
Jewelry
|
150.6
|
140.6
|
159.8
|
170.6
|
174.3
|
168.9
|
179.2
|
174.8
|
173.8
|
165.8
|
Silverware
|
117.7
|
114.2
|
108.6
|
95.6
|
105.2
|
82.6
|
83.0
|
66.2
|
66.6
|
59.1
|
Coins &
Medals
|
30.4
|
27.8
|
29.1
|
32.1
|
30.5
|
31.6
|
35.6
|
42.4
|
40.0
|
39.8
|
Total
Fabrication
|
835.6
|
821.2
|
861.5
|
888.0
|
855.4
|
823.9
|
837.4
|
828.6
|
848.3
|
840.5
|
Net
Government Purchases
|
0.7
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Producer
De-Hedging
|
--
|
--
|
16.0
|
27.4
|
--
|
24.8
|
20.9
|
--
|
--
|
6.8
|
Implied Net
Investment
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
15.4
|
--
|
15.0
|
46.6
|
77.2
|
64.5
|
Total
Demand
|
836.3
|
821.2
|
877.5
|
915.4
|
870.8
|
848.7
|
873.4
|
875.2
|
925.6
|
911.8
|
|
Silver Price
(London US$/oz)
|
4.897
|
5.544
|
5.220
|
4.951
|
4.370
|
4.599
|
4.879
|
6.658
|
7.312
|
11.549
|
SOURCE:
World Silver Survey 2007
|
In 2004, silver's established
firm bottom around the same time the US Treasury ran out of silver may be a
pure coincidence. Or maybe:
1. Other governments demanded
a better price for their silver than the US government causing the silver
price to rise despite persistence government sales.
2. The well advertised fact of
the depleting US treasury silver inventory might have triggered more net
implied investment demand, up from 15 million oz in 2003 to over 70 million
oz in 2005.
- Commercials short
position is bigger than ever
Commercials piled on 100,000+
short contracts in 2004, now it is at 140,000+. That is 500 million oz before
vs 700 million now. How does one explain more shorts with a rising silver
price? Perhaps the day of reckoning of massive short covering is to come? Or
perhaps there is no real correlation between silver shorts and the silver
price?
- Implied Net Investment
Demand Grew
While net investment demand
grew in 2005 and 2006, it still accounted for less than 10% of total physical
demand. One should take such figure from World Silver Survey with a grain of
salt. As no one truly knows how much physical silver changed hand privately.
Conclusion
In today's world, where paper
money far out-supplies of any metal at current prices, fundamental physical
supply and demand of the metal itself is really irrelevant. Simply put, people
will be voting with their papers.
The case applies to silver,
gold, grain, oil, and any commodity. After all, how can one blame the
tripling of wheat prices in the past 12 months on China? Did all of 1.3
billion Chinese changed their diet habit and switched to bread overnight?
People vote with their papers.
The Commitment of Traders Report shows today's positions have grown by 20%+
for silver (200 million oz) since 2004. There was a strong investment demand
to counter the dealer shorts. 200 million oz is merely $4 billion with present
invest-able dollars, measured at tens of $trillion (if not over $100
trillion). Any micro-analysis based on today's silver stats does not carry
much significance.
Since August of 2004, Gold has
gone up 250% from $380/oz to $950/oz, while silver has gone up 300% from $6
to $18.5. As the 4 pro-silver reasons I outlined in the article begin to
further manifest themselves, the percentage of performance difference to date
will be seen as negligible compared to what's to come.