With the S&P 500 slumping below its November
panic low, it's been one tough week in the stock markets. The SPX was
holding its own until the Marxist Party inexplicably decided to announce
giant and aggressive tax hikes on American investors. So confidence, already
very weak after the first true stock panic in 101 years, continued flagging on the Marxists' plans to steal
ever more of the fruits of our labors.
On Monday in particular, when the SPX plunged 4.7%
to close just over 700 (6.9% under its panic low), the sense of despair was
palpable. Everything looked bearish, everyone was pessimistic, and all hope
seemed lost. It felt like all the cards were stacked against American
investors, and the withering attack on our hard-earned capital by the thieves
in Washington
was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Monday's slide to 700 wasn't extreme enough to look
like a classic capitulation (like November 19th and 20th's sharp 12.4% plunge
did), but it sure felt like there was an overwhelming sense of resignation.
If nothing is going to improve for a long time, why not just accept this
misery as the new norm? While I felt awful too, I also felt an eerie sense of
déjà vu. The total surrender reminded me of events 6 years
earlier.
In early March 2003, the stock markets as
represented by the SPX looked horrible. This flagship index had fallen 49.1%
between March 2000 and October 2002. After closing at 798 in July 2002 capping
a brutal 31.8% slide in just 4 months, the SPX couldn't gain any traction. It
ground listlessly sideways to lower, looking increasingly sickly. By early
March 2003, it was back down near 801 again.
For nearly 8 months the SPX had flatlined and done
absolutely nothing. Hope seemed lost in March 2003 too. The Imperialists in Washington were massing an invasion force to annex Iraq. The
threat of a long and bloody foreign war, the very type of entanglement our
founding fathers warned against, hung over the economy and markets like a
pall of choking smoke. The upcoming war was a monumental uncertainty.
Go back and read articles from world-class
newspapers on the Iraq
war published in January and February 2003. The fears prior to the
event were staggering. Would Iraq
torch its oilfields like it had done to Kuwait in 1991? Would Saddam
Hussein wipe out Riyadh
or its massive oilfields with Scud missile strikes? That would have driven
oil prices stratospheric, which probably would have sparked a global
depression.
Would Hussein rain fire on Israeli cities, goading Jerusalem into striking
back? This could have ignited a giant Islamic jihad against Israel and
the Western world. Were Iraqi sleeper cells lurking in US cities, ready to
retaliate for a US
invasion with Russian suitcase nukes? If these terrorists didn't have NBC
weapons, would they go into shopping malls with AK-47s and slaughter
thousands of Americans across this nation?
Ahead of this war in early 2003, everything looked
bearish, everyone was pessimistic, and all hope seemed lost. Of course we
look back on this today and laugh, as the Hussein regime thankfully proved to
be a paper tiger. But the threat of war waged on American streets by Iraqi
factions or Islamic sympathizers, the threat of economic and ecological
catastrophe if Persian Gulf oilfields were
blasted offline for years, make today's tight credit environment look like a
sentimental picnic.
Yet as is nearly always the case in times of extreme
pessimism, the worst case didn't come to pass. The oil kept flowing, the
fabled sleeper cells never emerged to wreak havoc in America, and
life and markets marched on as always. While exceedingly hard, the very times
when things looked the bleakest in late 2002 and early 2003 were the ideal
times to buy stocks to ride the coming 101.5% SPX bull market.
Sentiment today feels so much like it did 6 years
ago, resigned despair. I can't help but marvel at the psychological
similarities. So I've also been wondering how today's SPX stacks up against
the famous late 2002 and early 2003 SPX bottoming period technically. This
week I decided to build some comparison charts and take a look. The parallels
are quite amazing and very illuminating on today's future prospects.
This first chart superimposes today's SPX since June
on top of this same index from June 2002 to March 2003. Today's SPX is
rendered in blue while the SPX of 6 years past is shown in red. While market
history never repeats itself exactly, it often rhymes. And there is no doubt
technically that what we've witnessed since October (after the primary panic
plunge) mirrors the last major SPX bottom pretty well.
In that awful period 6 years ago, the SPX ground
sideways to lower for many months. It not only gradually hit lower lows as
this painful bottoming process continued, but even its occasional highs
carved downward-sloping resistance. After stocks being cut in half and then
staying near lows for the better part of 8 months, investors really had
little reason to be optimistic or deploy capital 6 years ago today. It was a
very dark time.
Any of this sound familiar? Today we've seen the SPX
grind sideways to lower for many months. It has hit lower lows, the latest of
which emerged this week. Even its highs have been lower, as the blue
resistance line above shows. You can't look at any chart of US stock-market
action since October and see anything other than incredibly bearish technicals
if you are honest. There is no other interpretation.
While 2008's extreme panic selloff was far steeper
and faster than 2002's selloff, once the SPX got to its initial lows in
October it behaved similarly even though its means of arrival were different.
Note above how closely the SPX of December, January, and early February
tracks that of these same months 6 years ago. In both Decembers, the SPX
appeared to stabilize near its bottoming-range highs with a sizable rally
leading into year-end. Even the absolute SPX levels were nearly identical,
these charts are interchangeable.
In both Januaries, an initial rally soon fizzled out
which led to a sharp selloff that dragged the SPX back towards panic lows. In
both Februaries, the SPX ground lower initially in a sickening bottom-feeding
fashion. Enthusiasm was nowhere to be found. Things decoupled a bit in late
February though. Back in February 2003, the Marxists weren't running
Washington and self-righteously telling already overtaxed American investors
that we aren't paying enough taxes.
The overall sense of symmetry between 6 years ago
and today is undeniably strong. The fact that the SPX was trading in almost the same range as today is even more compelling. Late 2002 and
early 2003 was absolutely a classic SPX bottoming period and today's SPX
action mirrors these bottoming patterns of behavior very well. Today's
shell-shocked investors would do well to ponder this corollary.
Bottoming is a nasty business. It never feels
good, and it is never obvious at the time that a major bottom that will last
for years to come is being formed. Stock-market action drives newsflow, and
since the SPX does so poorly newsflow is overwhelmingly and hopelessly
bearish. Bottoms feel terrible. You are not excited about a potential
bull, but sick to your stomach about the sheer hopelessness of the situation.
While it is mostly horrendously low stock prices
that drive this despair, extreme volatility plays a major supporting role.
While speculators love volatility and can thrive in such times, investors
hate it. To wake up some morning and see 5% to 10% of your total stock wealth
evaporate within hours tests the mettle of even the most
battle-hardened investors. Sustained extreme volatility only happens in
bottoming periods.
This next chart examines the same June-to-March
spans separated by 6 years, but from the perspective of volatility. Back
then, the critical S&P 100 implied volatility index was called the VIX.
The S&P 100 is the top 20% of the S&P 500, the biggest, best, and most-liquid
companies in America. During times of extreme financial stress, it is the
stocks of these elite S&P 100 companies that traders rush to liquidate
since there is always a ready market for their shares with minimal risk of
self-driven adverse price impacts.
In other words, if you need to sell fast to raise
cash, the quickest and safest place to do it is in the stocks of the biggest
and most-widely-traded companies you own. Their volume can absorb your own
selling without it damaging the price you get, which can happen in small and
illiquid stocks. So the S&P 100 stocks are where the majority of the
trading action is during times of extreme fear that mark major multi-year bottoms.
Unfortunately in September 2003 the classic S&P
100 VIX was suddenly changed into today's S&P 500 VIX with an entirely
new calculation methodology. Today the classic S&P 100 VIX that traders
watched 6 years ago is known as the VXO. So even though I charted the VIX 6
years ago along with the VXO today, they are the same S&P 100 implied
volatility index. Today's VIX is not comparable with the original VIX.
Once again today's VXO is rendered in blue. But
since we saw an ultra-rare stock panic in 2008, volatility (and hence fear)
then was far higher than 2002. In order to make these 2 data series
more comparable visually so we can see volatility's behavior on a common
scale, I multiplied the VIX from 6 years ago by a factor of 1.73x. This takes
its 2002 high up to the same levels we saw in 2008's panic for easy visual
comparison. This inflated VIX is rendered in red, but the actual raw VIX from
2002 is still shown in yellow.
We saw a triple VIX peak 6 years ago, spread out
across a few months. This means there were 3 episodes during that SPX
bottoming of incredibly intense fear and abnormal selling pressure in the US
stock markets. And yet again we see a strong echo of this bottoming behavior
in 2008. Today's VXO carved a triple peak too, 3 separate intense selling episodes spread out
over a couple-month span.
Even though today's triple fear peak occurred at
much higher levels than 2002's due to the extremeness of the stock panic, the
reappearance of the triple-peak bottoming fear signature and its aftermath is
very provocative. The 2002 bottoming episode showed that fear peaks
relatively early in the bottoming, with several distinct fear climaxes. But
even though stocks continue grinding sideways to lower after that, fear
doesn't again approach the crazy levels it saw in its initial triple peaks.
We're seeing the same phenomenon today. Fear peaked
during the stock panic in October and November. Since then, even to this week
as the stock markets have plumbed very discouraging new lows, fear has been moderating
on balance. When the SPX initially falls to a depressed level, its
psychological impact is devastating. But after months of trading at these low
levels, traders gradually start to accept them as the new norm so anxiety
fades.
It's also interesting that both Januaries saw a
sharp VIX/VXO surge. Fear increased on renewed stock selling in the new year,
yet in both cases the raw levels of fear signaled by implied volatility were
far lower than at the triple-fear climaxes months earlier. This brings us to
an interesting debate about the necessary duration of the SPX bottoming
process psychologically versus any seasonal component to it.
Although very few investors today are even
considering these provocative 2002/2008 parallels, many of the ones who are
rightfully point out that today's bottoming process remains younger. The SPX
first fell under 800 in July 2002, the initial low of its bottoming process.
But in 2008, the SPX didn't fall under 800 until November, and its initial
low was actually in October. So today's bottoming is 3 or 4 months shorter
than 2002's depending on how you want to define it.
Therefore, instead of seeing the bottoming end in
March like in 2003 it might be pushed out 3 or 4 months farther. I have no
problem with this argument and agree it is logical. Perhaps it really takes 8
months of horrible markets for enough weak hands to be washed out for
decisive selling exhaustion to finally arrive. It's only after all the
traders scared into selling near the bottoming lows have sold that the
subsequent rally can launch.
But just maybe seasonality is a factor too. Even
though this pair of bottoming processes' beginnings were offset by a few
months, their Decembers, Januaries, and early Februaries looked very similar
in both technical SPX terms and in volatility-signature terms. Both events
saw new lows in October, which is of course the month in market history that
has seen the most serious stock-market plunges. Seasonality, the effect of
the passage of the calendar year on investors' collective psyche, can't be
overlooked.
I've pondered and studied seasonality in various
markets quite a bit over the years. It really exists, although often just as
a secondary driver. Here in the Northern Hemisphere, people tend to get more
depressed heading into the dark days of winter and more hopeful when the
sunlight starts returning again in the spring. It's just hard to be
pessimistic when spring is emerging. So while I wouldn't fall on my sword on
this, it would not surprise me one bit to see today's SPX bottoming process
end again this month.
Also on duration versus seasonality, the 2008 panic
was radically more intense than the selloff that ended the last stock bear in
2002. With much more selling done in a shorter period of time, driving far
higher fear, perhaps the necessary psychological damage to drive a major
multi-year bottom has been accomplished more quickly this time around. If so,
2002's duration may not transfer as cleanly to today as some expect.
This last chart shows what happened after that ugly
2002 bottoming process. Once the invasion of Iraq that was generating such
enormous popular anxiety actually happened, investors soon realized the
worst-case scenarios wouldn't play out. They never do. So the SPX started
surging in mid-March, up 26.3% by mid-June and 44.6% by the following
February. It pays big to buy stocks when everyone else is too scared
to do so.
While the rally out of today's SPX bottoming will be
unique, the angular blue line here traces 2003's rally to give a rough idea
of what we might expect. There was a sharp rebound soon followed by a steep
initial rally. This uptrend moderated in the usual summer doldrums, but the
SPX's ascent continued. 2003 ended up being one of the SPX's best years ever right after 2002 was one of its worst ever.
I don't know what the catalyst will be this time around
to mark the absolute end of today's bottoming process. Whatever it is, I'm
sure it won't be as clean as the Iraq invasion. But that doesn't matter. At
some point, all the weak hands are out and selling exhaustion arrives. When
all the frightened investors scared into selling at exactly the wrong time
have sold, there will be no one left but buyers and the SPX will
rally. This is as inevitable as spring following winter.
Many times when writing these essays, I am thankful
to be able to tell you about good calls on the markets I made in the past
that netted big profits for our subscribers and ourselves here at Zeal. So I
would be remiss not to tell you exactly what I thought 6 years ago this week.
I had made big money shorting the SPX in 2001 and 2002. Its technicals
still looked overwhelmingly bearish in early March 2003 and the VIX's sharp
rise in January that year made it look like still one more downleg was
coming.
So 6 years ago this week, I was heavily short right
on the cusp of the end of that bottoming period. I even wrote an essay on it
called "S&P 500 Waterfall Imminent". It was the single worst macro call I've ever
made in my entire career as a speculator. The SPX soon soared and I suffered
the biggest losses relative to my trading capital at the time that I've ever
taken. It was a hard, hard lesson about bottoming processes that I will never
forget.
Stock markets bottom when things feel utterly
hopeless, when stocks and the underlying economy look like they won't start
recovering for years yet. Stock markets bottom when technicals look
horrendous and every trading indicator you can find is loudly calling for new
lows extending into the foreseeable future. Stock markets bottom when
shorting feels like a sure thing and the mere idea of going long the stock
markets makes you feel physically ill. Stock markets bottom when almost no
one expects it. Bulls are born in despair.
At Zeal we are hardcore students of the markets. We
actively study history because understanding the past makes us better traders
today and in the future. History teaches that only contrarians are
consistently successful. If you want to make money in the markets, you have
to make the trades that few others are comfortable with. Today this is
certainly betting on the endless selling ending and a big rally erupting.
Cyclical bull markets are born out of these bottoming processes just like we are
witnessing today. The biggest up years in stock market history occur immediately after panic down years. Click these links and study
market history yourself. The odds of this bottoming process nearing its end,
and a massive rally soon erupting, are very high today. Subscribe today to our acclaimed monthly newsletter to learn about the big opportunities now and how we
are positioning our own capital to ride them!
The bottom line is the stock-market action we've
witnessed since late October looks uncannily similar to the bottoming process
witnessed in late 2002 and early 2003. The utterly rotten sentiment, the
overwhelmingly bearish SPX action, and the volatility signatures all match
remarkably well. Despair reigns supreme and seemingly only fools hold out
hope that things will materially improve anytime soon.
Just like back then, today it is easy to be short
but sickening to be long. But I learned my expensive lesson on this mindset 6
years ago. When things look the bleakest is exactly when we need to hold our
noses and buy. With the parallels between then and now uncanny in many ways,
all the ingredients are in place for a monster rally. Since today looks,
acts, and feels like an SPX bottom, odds are it is indeed an SPX bottom.
Adam
Hamilton, CPA
Zealllc.com
March 6,
2009
So how
can you profit from this information? We publish an acclaimed monthly
newsletter, Zeal Intelligence,
that details exactly what we are doing in terms of actual stock and options
trading based on all the lessons we have learned in our market
research. Please consider joining us each month for tactical trading
details and more in our premium Zeal Intelligence service at … www.zealllc.com/subscribe.htm
Questions
for Adam? I would be more than happy to address them through my
private consulting business. Please visit www.zealllc.com/adam.htm
for more information.
Thoughts,
comments, or flames? Fire away at zelotes@zealllc.com.
Due to my staggering and perpetually increasing e-mail load, I regret that I
am not able to respond to comments personally. I will read all messages
though and really appreciate your feedback!
Copyright
2000 - 2006 Zeal Research (www.ZealLLC.com)
|