On Feb 29, gold fell $100 an
ounce from a high of $1790 to a low of $1688. Numerous breathless
conspiracies abound, but most center on the dastardly (to gold longs) deed of
selling futures contracts naked. That is selling "paper gold" in
order to suppress the price, and then hope to buy back after the price falls.
I will leave it to anyone who
has studied Econ 101 to debunk the idea that selling will cause the price to
drop but that the subsequent buying would not cause the price to rise back to
the same level.
I want to focus on a different
problem with this hypoxic assertion. If someone sold futures naked, then one
could see that in the gold basis. The gold basis is basically (no pun
intended) the spread between the price of a gold futures contract minus the
price of gold for spot delivery. Selling one, but not the other, would do two
things. First, it would increase the open interest in gold futures. This is
the number of contracts outstanding. Second, it would change the basis. The
basis would fall. Sure enough as this graph shows the basis for each of the
moths Apr, Jun, Aug, and Dec futures fell (ignoring the cobases, which are
the lines on the bottom of the chart).
Larger Image
There is another piece of
evidence. Open interest is quoted daily for each contract. This table shows
open interest before and after this correction, for all four months (which
represent the vast majority of the gold futures contracts outstanding).
Month
|
Before
|
After
|
April
|
270,183
|
252,192
|
June
|
65,492
|
65,522
|
August
|
24,793
|
25,230
|
December
|
31,474
|
31,603
|
We see no significant change
in June, August, or December. The big change is April. In April, open
interest declined 6.7%. This was not selling of new futures, dumped onto the
bid to suppress the price. This was panicky or overleveraged longs
liquidating (i.e. selling onto the bid to get out of gold).
It is worth noting that virtually
every asset category fell at the same time as gold, starting around 10am EST
that day.
I want to discuss one other
thing about gold. There is a noticeable falling trend to the basis that
begins around January 9. The price of gold had been in a rising trend from
$1615 to $1790 just before the correction. A rising price with a falling
basis means that the price was driven up by buying of physical gold,
rather than buying of futures. This is confirmed by the basis falling
sharply during the correction.
This is a good time to buy
gold. In this author's opinion, gold got whacked along with everything else
due to the marginal withdrawal of credit. This forced some "naked paper
longs" to liquidate, which triggered sell-stops, and so on. But the demand
for the physical metal, meanwhile, continues apace.
Let's take a quick look at
silver. Silver was whacked twice as badly as gold, from 36.37 to a low of
33.68 in two hours. The silver basis chart shows a different picture than
gold.
Larger Image
Silver's bases had been rising
from January 9. This means that silver's price was rising, unlike gold, due
to buying of futures. This is a bearish dynamic because it means that the
marginal bidder on physical silver is the warehouseman who buys physical and
simultaneously sells a future. Silver was being bought to carry. What can be
bought on leverage, and what can be stuffed into warehouses, can come out
again.
Silver's sharp correction of
around 7.4% was the result.
I drew lines under the low
points of the bases, to show that silver bases fell sufficiently to break out
of its rising channel (a move which has been extended on March 2 and March
5). The flush in futures did not affect the demand for physical metal; with
the net result that silver's basis has fallen rapidly since February 29. This
is a bullish change to what had been a bearish chart.