A decision by the
European Union that forces Germany to include the shortfalls of
government-owned banks into its national debt, pushing the debt/GDP ratio to
90% from 79% overnight, is the final straw that will have broken the Euro's
back. (Hat tipping Zerohedge who broke this news first in blogosphere
and extrapolated what a similar scenario would mean for US.)
It is ironic that the Eurocrats are solely responsible for this. According to
a report in the Wall Street Journal,
The bailout of
Germany's banking sector may swell the country's public debt rate to 90% of
gross domestic product, Die Zeit weekly newspaper reports Wednesday. (NOTE:
It is not public but government debt, which makes a big difference for
me. Or did you sign one of the risky deals that put us into this mess?)
The weekly based
this estimate on a recent decision by Eurostat requiring Germany to
include the balance sheets of public-owned bad banks (NOTE:
It is government-owned; or did you vote for any of these nationalizations?) -
set up to help financial institutions offload toxic and non-strategic assets
- into its overall debt ratio.
As Eurostat is the statistical office of the EU it
can be expected that all other EU members will have to follow suit, igniting
a fresh round of debt growth of government debts.
It is permissible to speculate that Eurostat may have sent such a notice to
all EU nations.
So far, only Germany and Austria had to resort to outright nationalizations.
In Germany, which took ownership of WestLB and Hypo Real Estate (HRE)
earlier,
state-owned
WestLB AG bank has already offloaded €77 billion into such a rescue
bank. Going by the Eurostat decision, €54 billion of WestLB's toxic
assets transferred to the bad bank must be included in Germany's overall debt
level.
Finance ministry
spokeswoman, Jeanette Schwamberger, said the "winding-down entity of
WestLB has already been included in the government's recently published
calculations of the debt level."
In July, it
forecast Germany's debt level will rise from 73.1% in 2009 to 79% of GDP in
2010, 80% in 2011, to 80.5% respectively in 2012 and 2013 before easing to
80% in 2014.
Die Zeit said
that if nationalized mortgage lender Hypo Real Estate is added to the
equation, Germany's debt level could widen to 90%.
However, the
impact from Hypo Real Estate is yet unclear because a rescue bank hasn't been
set up and it's unknown how big the volume will be, according to
Schwamberger.
Hypo Real Estate
has said it plans to offload €210 billion into such a bad bank, but has
already added that it might need less fresh capital than previously said. A
consolidation of assets might reduce the widening of Germany's debt,
the WSJ wrote.
Living in Austria I naturally think first what this will mean for this
country (more thoughts on the rest of Europe below) that got wrecked by
former chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel under whose "leadership"
white-collar crime and corruption has begun to mushroom since 2000. Only
today a German paper concluded that nobody gets ever prosecuted as long as he
is connected to the government. Austrian observers have been enraged about
this for some years. Now the sovereign will be presented with a horrific -
and probably un-payable bill.
Austria has nationalized scandal-laden Carinthian Hypo Alpe Adria AG last
December. The bank recorded a net loss of €1.6 billion in 2009
but still sits on a portfolio of €7.3 billion non-performing loans and
another €7 billion in loans on the watchlist while prosecutors are
still combing through the bank's files to find out if there may be still more
losses in the offing.
If these €14 billion end up on the governments tab, the debt/GDP
ratio will rise some 7 percentage points to more than 73%.
Eurocrats Suicided the Euro
While this may be small fry compared to the big Eurozone
countries Eurostat's action may forebode that Austria will have to include
the debts of government-owned special entities like debt-laden Austrian
railways OeBB and money losing road-builder Asfinag as well. This would drive
up Austria's current debt:GDP ratio of 66.5% significantly.
This will also deteriorate Greece's position further when I think of Hellenic Postbank TT.
As all major Eurozone countries have long exceeded the Maastricht criterion
that stipulates government debt of no more than 60% in relation to GDP, the
death of the Euro, an artificial fiat currency with absolutely no backing
behind it, is clearly written on the wall.
And there is no cure for it. We can rather expect more symptoms of terminal
illness to emerge once all EU countries have to come up with an unadulterated
account of government net debts.
Spain is off the hook for the time being as the problematic Cajas are not
formally state-owned - yet. And I guess I will not earn any serious criticism
for the claim that spun-out debts will emerge in many more EU countries that
will have to be added to government debt again. Parsing the list of Europe's 91 potentially bad banks more
losses or accounting irregularities can be realistically expected. Not one of
them is in good shape.
All this happens almost exactly 3 years after the beginning of the subprime crisis which
has by now swollen into the worst Western financial crisis of all times.
Don't believe into any politician who says that it was necessary to prop up European
banks with EU, ECB or government funds.
Banks may be systemically relevant - but certainly not all of them. And this
is the core European problem where politicians, scarily eyeing their
constitutencies, wanted to save all banks and not let the boom-bust cycle let
go its course as is the case in all other industries. There is absolutely no
reason why banks should be shielded from their own fallacies.
Sad as it is, this crisis will lead to an even sadder reemergence of
nationalism in Europe when every country will look for its own best once it
finds out that neither the EU nor the ECB has the money to save it and they
will have to scramble for funds on reluctant capital markets.
The ECB may hold its leading interest rate at 1% or even drive it lower, but
this will not prevent a surge in government bond yields because it is clear
the risk is actually much higher than reflected by current low yields.
Experts have so far overlooked the dichotomy of historically low rates and
the real risks one carries by buying government debt. None of them saw the
subprime crisis coming either. Never before has there been such a contorted
situation that governments pay record-low yields whilst being entangled in
the numerically biggest debt crisis in history.
It is an irony that of all people it will have been the Eurocrats of Eurostat
that will have suicided the Euro when seeing it from a post-event
perspective.
I, for my part, hope to find some sleep after reading a few more pages
of This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of
Financial Folly,
wishing that all responsible officials in Europe would read it too. Otherwise
we may be doomed because "Experience shows that man never learned anything from experience".
Toni Straka
Editor, the Prudent Investor
Toni Straka is an
INDEPENDENT Certified Financial Analyst (OeVFA, EFFAS) who worked as a financial
journalist for 15+ years and now evaluates global market trends. Analyzing
financial and political news permanently he wants to share his insight with
those who understand that we are in an era of global redistribution of
wealth. The US-European centric approach does not work anymore. Five billion
people in the developing countries now demand their fair share of the world's
resources.
|