This
article is about the way the Central Bank Community manipulates the price of
gold and the role of the LBMA within. We describe some of the signs that the
Central Bank Community manipulate the price of gold and that they are using the
LBMA to reach their goal. Is the manipulation of the gold price a classic case of
Diffusion of responsibility because so many organizations are involved and
avoid taking responsibility?
Manipulation is a joint effort of the Central
Bank Community
The signs
that Central Banks manipulate the price of gold are written all over the wall,
for instance:
“The fifth objective of Central Bank
cooperation is the joint effort of Central Banks to influence the price of gold
and foreign exchange.” William R. White, Head Monetary and Economic Department
at the BIS,
27 June 2005.
“For the purpose of stabilizing the exchange
value of the dollar, the Secretary of the Treasury, with the approval of the
President, … is authorized to deal in gold and foreign exchange … as he may
seem necessary…” The Gold Reserve Act of 1934.
“All Central Banks are in the same boat, that
threats in either direction are harmful to all of us, and that the dollar
stability is the key-note of the whole thing.” Cameron Cobbold, Governor Bank
of
England
1949-1961, March 1961.
“From 1962 the Central Banks, operated from the
BIS in
Basel,
played a crucial role in stabilizing the free gold price in the
London market.” Gold:
talks in
Basle, 6/7 January 1962.
“However, at the end of the day, the Gold Pool
(also called:
Basle Syndicate) was nothing
more than a ploy, an artificial device to keep the market in line with official
policy.” Secret note
UK
Treasury D.A. Bleach, 26 March
1968
.
An in 2009 declassified telegram from AM
Embassy to the Secretary of State sent in 1968 regarding the end of the Gold
Pool speaks about: “Remain the masters of gold” … “A gold price of dollar 35
per ounce it is a matter of urgency to reach international agreement on the
“rules of the game” …. These rules will have to be more basic than just a
“holding operation”. They have to be so simple and convincing that it become
crystal-clear to speculators that there is no point any more in speculating on
a increase on the price of gold. It is only than that the speculative demand
for gold will subside and that, very likely, dishoarding will take place”. … “A
reshuffle club should harmonise the ratio between gold holdings and (gross)
asset among gold-holding countries and countries with relatively low gold
holdings.”
“The US loses influence in world affairs
whenever the dollar is weak in exchange markets…vulnerability to confidence
crises…gold is a basic problem…” Declassified memorandum CIA dated
4 April 1968.
“The gold reserves were actually not used for
interventions, due to the current practices as evidenced by SWAPS.” The
Mechanics of Interventions in Exchange Markets by
A.L. Balbach Fed St. Louis, February
1978.
“A higher dollar gold price could possible been
seen as a proof of distrust against the dollar.” Dr. J. Zijlstra, former head
of the BIS and the Dutch Central Bank, memoirs 1993.
“Investing in gold may have become out of
favour, but all Central Banks see gold as the most prominent part of their
international reserves.” Dr. J. Zijlstra, former head of the BIS and the Dutch
Central Bank, memoirs 1993.
“The price of gold is pretty well determined by
us.” Governor Wayne Angell Fed meeting 6/7 July 1993.
The Washington
Agreement on Gold was signed of 26
September 1999
in Washington,
D.C. during the IMF annual
meeting, and the
US
Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Fed were present. The
agreement was perceived as putting a cap on European gold sales. The agreement
limits also their gold leasing and their use of gold futures and options.
According to the Swedish Central Bank
(Riskbank) is the aim of the agreement to limit the Central Bank’s sales of
gold in order to avoid undesirable effect on the gold price.
A confidential IMF report from March 1999 about
the reporting template for Central Banks advices western Central Banks to
conceal their gold loans and SWAPS because information about them is “highly
market-sensitive” and accountability about them would “hinder secret currency”
interventions by Central Banks, in view of the limited number of participants
in such transactions.
“Letting gold go to dollar 850 per ounce was a
mistake.” Memoirs 2004 Paul Volcker former chairman of the
US Fed.
“In reserves management, monetary authorities
also may undertake gold SWAPS. …Such gold SWAPS generally are undertaken
between monetary authorities and with financial institutions. Monetary authorities
may treat gold SWAPS as collateralized loans, leaving the gold claim on the
balance sheet… This treatment applies only when an exchange of cash against
gold occurs, the commitment to buy back the gold is legally binding, and the
repurchase price is fixed at the time of the SPOT transaction. The logic is
that in a gold SWAP the “economic ownership” of the gold remains with the
monetary authorities, even though the authorities temporarily have handed over
the “legal ownership.“ … Usually, the Central Banks receive cash for the gold. The
counterparty generally sells the gold on the market but typically makes no delivery
of the gold. The counterparty often is a bank that wants to take short
positions in gold and bets the price of gold will fall or is one that takes
advantage of arbitrage possibilities offered by combining a gold SWAP with a
gold sale and a purchase of a gold future.”
Guidelines for international reserves,
paragraph 100, IMF,
12
September 2013
.
“The bullion market is often criticised by
observers for being secretive and lacking in information and data.
Unfortunately, to an extent, this is inevitable given the need for a duty of
care to clients which dictates that a high level of discretion is an essential
element in so much of the business that takes place in the market, particularly
for gold.” Alan Baker, Director Deutsche
Morgan Grenfell and LBMA Chairman. January 1997.
“We are not a member of the LBMA, but we
continue to play a key role in the
London
market. We have observes status on the Management, Physical and Vault
Committees of the LBMA.” Luke Thorn, Bank of
England, 10 March 2013.
“The role of Central Banks in the bullion
market preclude ‘total’ transparency, at least at public level” LBMA CEO Ruth
Crowell in a letter regarding the Fair and Effective Markets Review to the Bank
of England, 30 January 2015.
“The LBMA has a global client base. This
includes the majority of the gold-holding Central Banks.”
A guide to the London Bullion Market Association, May 2017.
Central
Bankers independence is enshrined in law in many countries, and Central Bankers
tend to be independent thinkers. It is worth asking why such a large group of
them decided to associate themselves with manipulating of the free gold market.
And off course the knowledge of the manipulation makes them responsible.
Remember:
World
Official Gold Holdings 31.978
ton
Sec BIS
related Official Gold Holdings 29.805
ton
(Figures World Gold Council, February 2015)
What is the relation between the Central Bank Community
and the LBMA?
The LBMA,
the London Bullion Market Association, provides for Central Banks a tool for hiding
their secret operations in the gold market and their London Spot Price setting.
Set up as a quote-driven hardly regulated OTC market through the Bank of
England with only 13 Market Making Members.
The LBMA
claims to be The Competent Authority for the world Bullion Market.
The LBMA is
centred in
London
with a global Membership and client base including the majority of the Central
Banks that holds gold (1).
Important: the London Spot Price is set on the LBMA OTC gold
market.
The London
Spot Price is the basis for virtually all transactions in gold. It is
quote-driven bid/ask price made by the 13 LBMA Market Makers based upon their bilateral
trading activity in the hardly regulated LBMA OTC gold market. The London Spot Price refers to the price of
gold for immediate delivery (read: two workings days after the day of the
deal).
The London
Spot Price is published on WebICE and constantly updated by the bullion desks
of the 13 Market Makers (2).
Read for
the difference between the LBMA Gold Price (Auction) and the London Spot Price our
paper dated
23 September
2016
. For now it is enough to know that the London Spot Price is
the Standard (Benchmark) for the price of gold and thus all other gold-related
products.
The LBMA in focus
The LBMA is
a trading association, not an exchange.
The LBMA
produces the Good Delivery Lists for gold; detailing the names of accredited
refiners. The lists are universally recognised as the de facto standard for the
quality of gold bars.
The LBMA
has no regulatory responsibilities for the bullion market; this had
traditionally been the responsibility of the Bank of England and more recently
the Financial Services Authority (3).
The LBMA
was set up in 1987 by the Bank of England, which was at that time the bullion
market’s regulator (1). It is very strange that a Central Bank set up a
commercial trading organisation with no regulatory responsibilities for the
bullion market and as founding Members (4):
N.M. Rothschild & Sons Limited, London
|
J. Aron & Company (UK)
Limited,
London
|
Mocatta & Goldsmid Limited, London
|
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, London
|
Sharps Pixley Limited, London
|
Rudolf Wolff & Company Limited, London
|
In 2017 the
LBMA has 82 Members and 63 Associates, located in more than 30 countries. Under
the Members the 13 Market Makers:
Full Market Makers
|
Market Makers
|
|
Citi
|
Bank of Nova Scotia
|
Societe Generale
|
Goldman Sachs
|
BNP Paribas (No 7 of Top 10 Banks)
|
Standard Chartered Bank
|
HSBC Group (No 5 of Top 10 Banks)
|
ICBC Standard (No 1 of Top 10 Banks)
|
Toronto-Dominion Bank
|
JP Morgan (No 6 of Top 10 Banks)
|
Merrill Lynch
|
|
UBS
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
Remarkable:
The power in banking is unquestionably shifting eastwards to
China. Out of
the World’s top 10 largest banks, the top 4 are Chinese banks, only 2 banks are
American banks. Although the Chinese gold market is the world’s largest
physical gold trading market, only 1 Chinese bank (ICBC as of
4 April 2016) is a Market
Making Member in the LBMA OTC gold market (5).
Chairman of
the LBMA is dr Paul Fisher. He has been a senior figure at the Bank of England
for 26 years. From 2002 he ran the Bank of England Foreign Exchange Division
where he worked with the LBMA (6).
The LBMA chosen Market Organization: OTC instead
an Exchange
Key-aspects
OTC market (7)
- Managed
by Market Makers
- Opaque
Market
- Lack
of transparency in price setting
- Quote-driven
market only on bids and asks of Market Makers (bilateral trading)
- Well–organized
network of banks and other highly sophisticated parties
- Inaccessible
to individuals and retail trade through minimum traded amounts
- Lack
of supervision and coordination between regulators
Key-aspects
Exchange
- Institutional
rules that govern trading and information flows about the trading
- Clearing
facilities for post-trade activities
- Order-driven
market displays all of the bids and asks
- Centralized
communication of bid and offer prices to the whole market
- Level
playing field for all market participants
So why is
the LBMA gold market set up as an OTC market and why do they persist in this
choice?
According
to LBMA CEO Ruth Crowell on
27
April 2015
the LMBA won’t move from OTC to an exchange (8).
The LBMA OTC market: lack of transparency
The LBMA
OTC market does not require its members to report on turnover, worse the LBMA
published a Global Precious Metals Code on
25 May 2017. This applies to all market
participants involved in the global wholesale Precious Metals market. Chapter 4
is about Information Sharing. Leading
Principe:
Markets Participants should not disclose Confidential Information, such as
Precious Metals trading information:
- details
Market Participant’s order book
- spread
matrices provided by Market Participants to their Clients
- orders
for and during the Benchmark Process (read setting the London Spot Price), and
- details
of an individual Client’s vault holding
The OTC
market provides confidentiality, as transactions are conducted solely between
the two principals involved. According to the LBMA is this particularly
important for Central Banks activity in the market (9).
As the
London Gold market is an OTC market, no comprehensive data is published. The LBMA
currently only reports monthly net volumes of gold and silver transfers between
6 association’s clearing members (HSBC, ICBC, JP Morgan, Scotiabank and UBS). It
is widely acknowledged that the clearing statistics dramatically understated
the true amount of gold traded on the LBMA OTC market.
Joke in the LBMA Alchemist, January 1997
The LBMA OTC gold market: unwanted ad hoc
figures
Stewart
Murray, Chief Executive LBMA carried out a survey of LBMA Members trading
turnover in the Loco London gold market in the first quarter of 2011 to
quantifying the real size of the LBMA OTC gold market. Why did the Management
Committee of LBMA decide to authorise a survey of members gold trading? The
answer lies in
Europe, or more precisely, in
the discussions within the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision on the new
liquidity regulations for banks (10).
Results of
the survey in daily averages:
Conclusions
based upon the survey
The Loco
London Turnover in ounces is
9 times the amount according the Clearing
Statistics. Logical, as the BIS is from the 1930s the clearinghouse for Central
Bank gold transactions. The LBMA cleared figures excluded Central Banks
figures. The only reason that those gold transactions are led through the 13 LBMA
Market Makers is for setting the price of gold.
SPOT transactions were 90% of the
LBMA OTC gold market turnover. Remember such gold SWAPS (SPOT transactions)
generally are undertaken between monetary authorities and with financial
institutions (Guidelines for international reserves, paragraph 100, IMF,
12 September 2013).
Based upon
the foregoing we made the follow table:
The
turnover in tons of the Central Banks is 8 times the LBMA clearing turnover.
The number
of transfers of the Central Banks is 2,2 times the LMBA clearing numbers.
The average
ounces per transfer of the Central Banks is 3,8 times the LBMA clearing
numbers.
The Central
Banks gold transactions turnover is 89% of the total turnover.
The Central
Banks gold transactions determines the price of gold (bilateral quotations sets
the world benchmark London Spot Price).
The average
duration
of a gold contract on the LBMA OTC gold market is $ 468.000.000.000
amount outstanding (11) divided by $ 60.684.945.818.992 (4 * $
15.171.236.454.748) * 260 is
2,00 days.
Terry
Smeeton, Head of FX Division of the Bank of England and member of the (secret)
Gold and FX Committee at the BIS on 7 April 1997 held also a survey in the
1990s (12). The outcome was comparable with the survey of 2011.
According
this survey approximately 7 million ounces gold were traded daily during May
1996, compared with 7,5 million ounces in May 1994. Spot transactions were 75%
of the turnover.
The dominant operating agents on the LBMA OTC gold
market: BIS, JPMC and ICBC
Interesting
is the role of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) within the LBMA.
At
23 December 2011
ICBC was officially admitted as a full member of the LBMA. ICBC was the first
commercial bank in
China
to join the LBMA. At 4 April
2016
the ICBC is reclassified as a Spot Market Making Member of the
LBMA. So the bid/asks quotes of ICBC are part of the price setting of the
London Spot Price. Notable is that ICBC (temporarily?) acts for its own account
(opposed to JPMC).
The
derivative position 2016 (commodities and other, separate figures not
available) of ICBC is 35 times the derivative position in 2011 and at the max
39% of the global total. .
16 May
2016: ICBC buys from Barclays vault in
London
that can store 2.000 ton bullion.
18 October 2013: Fusun International (China’s largest
private-owned conglomerate) buys former JPM building in
New York (opposite to Fed building), used to
contain up to 20% of the world’s gold.
Remarkable
The gold
trading activity on the OTC market is hardly transparent.
In January
2009, the G20 asked for substantial reforms to OTC derivatives markets in order
to ‘improve transparency, mitigate systemic risk, and protect against market
abuse’. The G20 reform agenda requires standardised OTC derivatives to be
cleared through central counterparties on exchange or electronic trading
platforms.
Well-known
shortcomings are on the so-called pre-trade transparency (information about
price quotes and trade sizes is available to the two parties involved in the
trade prior to executing the trade), the post-trade transparency (information
about executed trades made available to market participants other than the two
parties involved in the trade, or a narrow set of dealers).
Through
this information asymmetry are uninformed participants at risk of making the
wrong trading decisions (13).
It is
important to note that the London Spot Price is dominated by a few large banks
that trade gold on behalf of their clients or directly with their clients (as
principals). Because the banks can become buyers or sellers themselves, the
bank have a considerable influence on the price at witch they are willing to
buy and sell (14).
Viswanathan
and Wang (2002) show that when the number of Market Makers is small (thirteen
in the case of gold), Market Makers will no longer provide competitive quotes.
Conclusion
So what is
there to say about the LBMA OTC gold market?
- The
LBMA is a ploy, an artificial device to keep the market in line with policy of
the Central Bank Community
- Ideal
for the Central Bank Community to their secret interventions on the gold price
- Without
severe costs for the Central Banks to control the gold price on the free
market
- The
Bank of England is at arm’s length
- A
well organized network
- Without
regulatory responsibilities for the bullion market
- Bilateral
quotations sets the world benchmark London Spot Price
- Non
transparent
- Leading
to a information asymmetry on the gold market
- With
a lack of supervision and coordination between regulators
- Real
turnover is 9 times the LBMA cleared volume
- The
LBMA Clearing Statistics excluded Central Bank gold transaction
- The
BIS is the clearinghouse for Central Banks gold transactions
- Central
Bank gold transactions determines the price of gold
- Under
growing Chinese influence
- There
in no free market price of gold
- Contraire
to the substantial reforms as wanted by the G20 in January 2009
Diffusion of responsibility
Diffusion
of responsibility is a psychological phenomenon in which people or organisations
as being part of a group may reduce their sense of responsibility. It looks
like the
US
succeeded to “Remain the masters of gold.” The other organizations like the
BIS, individual Central Banks, IMF, the LBMA and their 13 Market Makers, Supervisors
and Regulators look like subordinates who claim to be following orders to avoid
taking responsibility for what they logically know to be illegal or immoral
actions.
(1) A guide to The London Bullion Market
Association, May 2017
(2) Bron Suchecki, VP Monetary Metals, 1 June 2008
(3) Website LMBA, June 2017
(4) Memorandum and Articles of Association
of the LBMA, November 1987
(5) Bullion Star 15 August 2016
(6) Website LMBA, 13 July 2016
(7) European Commission, 11 September 2016 (partly)
(8) Bloomberg.com, 27 April 2015
(9) Letter 30 January 2015 from LBMA CEO Ruth Crowell to
the Bank of
England.
(10) The Alchemist Sixty Three, Stewart Murray CEO LMBA, 2011
(11) BIS report, OTC derivatives market
activity 1H2011
(12) The Alchemist, London Bullion Market, Survey of Turnover
January 1997
(13) Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2011 Q4
(14) Investingsanswers 19 April 2016
|
Nico Simons is a Dutch investigative journalist on financial issues, especially monetary issues. His articles are regularly published on MoneyInsights.org.
|
The author is not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by Sprott Money Ltd. The views and opinions expressed in this material are those of the author or guest speaker, are subject to change and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sprott Money Ltd. Sprott Money does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness and reliability of the information or any results from its use.