In the same category

The Periphery is Failing

IMG Auteur
 
Published : August 28th, 2013
1423 words - Reading time : 3 - 5 minutes
( 6 votes, 4.5/5 ) , 3 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
3
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Editorials

For years we've preached the "From the Outside In" principle of markets: When trouble starts, it nearly always does so out in the weaker periphery before creeping towards the core.

We saw this in the run-up to the housing bubble collapse, as sub-prime mortgages gave way before prime loans, and in Europe, as smaller economies like Greece, Ireland, and Cyprus have fallen first and hardest (so far). We see this today in accelerating food stamp use among poorer U.S. households. In each case, the weaker economic parties give way first before being followed, over time, by the stronger ones.

Using this framework, we can often get several weeks to several months of advance notice before trouble erupts in the next ring closer to the center.

Which makes today notable, as we're receiving a number of new warning signs. The periphery is giving way.

Ever since the current economic "recovery" began, we've been warning of the high risk of a renewed financial crisis. That risk is now uncomfortably high. This is because nothing that led to the first round of troubles was actually addressed at the root level. Instead, prior troubles were simply papered over with central-bank liquidity, leaving structural weakness intact -- for instance, our ‘too big to fail’ banks are just as big, and our sovereign debt levels are even worse than they were pre-2008.

The next crisis will be larger and more damaging than the last one principally because nothing got fixed, political capital was spent, and trust has been eroded leaving everyone depleted and ready to bolt for the financial exits.

With the periphery failing, we likely have only weeks perhaps a month or two until the next big dislocation hits.

Déjà Vu (All Over Again)

We’ve been here before. We’ve seen trouble start on the outside and progress inwards, and not all that long ago.

In 1999 and in 2007 we saw the financial markets blithely trundle along higher, even as clear signs of trouble at the margins were abundant.

One of the common myths about the stock market, often repeated in the press, is that it peers into the future. It is ‘the great discounting machine.’

But the stock market powered higher into the new millennium, despite being the most overvalued it had ever been in history, before diving violently in 2001. So much for ‘peering into the future.’

And again, the stock market went to new heights in 2007 even as the housing market was obviously deteriorating and about to suffer a truly historic break after a truly historic and bubbly run to the upside. The great discounting machine ended up reacting to trouble rather than anticipating it.

Despite these two obvious failures, many still hold to the belief that the stock market is a useful indicator of future health or distress, which means this view is more a matter of faith than fact.

My view has always been that the stock market is a great ‘liquidity detecting machine’ – something that fits the data very, very well – and that it’s reacting to liquidity in the system more than anything truly fundamental. This has not always been the case, but ever since Greenspan opened the Federal Reserve printing presses to each and every minor financial sniffle in the mid-1990s, Fed-supplied liquidity has been the dominant driver of equity prices.

To tilt the conversation slightly, one of the enduring mysteries to me is how we have managed to experience not one, not two, but three full bubbles in the space of less than 15 years. Tech stocks, then housing, then all stocks and bonds; three bubbles, each bigger than the last.

As I have written extensively in the past, the current all-time highs in both bond AND equity prices (with bonds collectively including everything from 1-month T-bills to the worst junk paper you can buy), is nothing more and nothing less than the biggest financial asset bubble in history.

In order to believe this will all turn out well, you have to believe that this time will be different…not just a little bit different, but 180 degrees away from literally every single other financial bubble in all of history.

This is precisely what is being asked of you each day by the financial press, the Fed, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the politicians in the Western power centers.

Our view here is that it’s never different. To that we’ll add:

  • A crisis rooted in too much debt cannot be ‘solved’ by creating more debt
  • Prosperity cannot be printed out of thin air
  • Rigged systems and markets destroy trust
  • Nothing can grow exponentially forever, except for the number of zeros printed on your currency

Collectively, the above list boils down to Anything that cannot go on forever...won’t [credit: Herb Stein].

Deficits and Debts Do Matter

Deficits don’t matter!” Dick Cheney once famously growled, putting to words the belief system that envelops the U.S. today, especially its financial and monetary authorities. Because we’ve managed over the past three decades to dodge any serious consequences from racking up debts, these folks believe that will always be true. Absence of evidence becomes evidence of absence.

Sticking just to the economic “E” (leaving aside energy and the environment), our diagnosis of the current difficulties is simply that the OECD economies left reason aside and instead embarked on a sustained period of borrowing at a rate nearly twice as fast as underlying economic growth.

That is, we collectively fell for the idea that one could simply borrow more than one earned...forever. I'm always surprised by how an entire culture can collectively believe in something that no individual would ever hold to be true.

We know that we cannot individually borrow more than we earn forever. And we are equally sure that this remains true if we pool ten people together. But we accept the idea that a sovereign nation can somehow magically pull this off. This either represents a profound inability to apply logic, or a form of cultural schizophrenia, or both.

Hot-Money Bubble Dynamics

For years now, ever since the Fed et al. embarked on the global rescue plan that involved little more than flooding the world with historically unprecedented amounts of freshly printed money (a.k.a. “liquidity”), that money has been sloshing around looking for things to do.

With interest rates on ‘safe’ investments at 0% (or close enough), that hot money has been looking for anything that resembles a decent yield. This ‘yield chasing’ went to every corner of the globe and piled into any and every market that it could.

Some of these markets were the headline U.S. and European equity and bond markets, and some of them were so-called 'emerging markets' such as Brazil, India, Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia.

As this hot money flowed into these emerging markets, the respective countries in order to prevent their currencies from rising too much did the usual and recycled the money-flows back into U.S. Treasury paper, German Bunds, and other sovereign debt instruments.

Now, all of this is being undone.

It is a hot-money machine running in reverse, and it is creating the usual distortions, difficulties, and hardships for the afflicted countries. Currencies are plummeting, as are local equity and bond markets.

In short, to understand where our financial markets are and where they are headed, you don't need to know much about fundamentals at all. Earnings, GDP, job growth, etc. are secondary to liquidity flows. That’s why the various markets are so keyed on the Fed’s next statements and when and how extreme the ‘tapering’ might be.

That’s all that really matters.

Well, that’s not entirely true. For reasons that cannot be entirely explained nor controlled, sometimes bubble dynamics just end. People stop believing. And what was once a virtuous cycle suddenly morphs into vicious one.

I believe that’s the moment where we are now. And, as always, it's starting from the outside in.

In Part II: Blast Shields Up! Prepare for Incoming!, we look at the growing number of klaxons warning that central bank policies to prop up the global economic system are failing at an accelerating rate.

There are many fronts on which this losing battle will be fought, but our biggest concerns lie in the bond markets ultimately and including U.S. Treasurys.

Defensive maneuvers are the name of the game now for the prudent. Make sure you're one of them.

Click here to access Part II of this report (free executive summary; enrollment required for full access).

Data and Statistics for these countries : Brazil | Cyprus | Greece | India | Indonesia | Ireland | Japan | Philippines | Thailand | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Brazil | Cyprus | Greece | India | Indonesia | Ireland | Japan | Philippines | Thailand | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :4.5 (6 votes)
>> Next article
Dr. Chris Martenson is an independent economist and author of a popular website, ChrisMartenson.com. His Crash Course video series explores the intertwining significance of the “three E’s”—the economy, energy, and environment and offers articulate, dynamic insight into the workings of our monetary system. Chris earned a PhD in neurotoxicology from Duke University, and an MBA from Cornell University. A fellow of the Post Carbon Institute, Chris’s work has appeared on PBS and been cited by the Washington Post. He is a contributor to SeekingAlpha.com. Chris is an accomplished presenter who has offered the Crash Course seminar all over the United States. The online course has been translated into several languages, and been viewed over 1.5 million times. His website offers both daily free content as well as a newsletter service for enrolled members. His goal is to help as many people understand that we are in the midst of a profound economic shift and that equally profound risks and opportunities lie in our future. For those that can see them coming, tremendous advantages exist.
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
A very good article by Dr. Martenson who understands what i have been saying for years; America will not crumble until Europe and Japan have done so. The core economy is always the last one to fall. It is a most important principle to understand when trying to anticipate where capital will be moving to next.
Rate :   1  0Rating :   1
EmailPermalink
"I'm always surprised by how an entire culture can collectively believe in something that no individual would ever hold to be true."

I think it was Nietzsche that said something like, "Insanity is rare in individuals but the rule for people in groups." People are eager to belong to a herd and will accept the herd-think unquestioningly.

Some other famous guy effectively said, "If you don't fully understand the game, stay the hell out of it." So if herd-think seems illogical, don't join. If the economic investing environment seems illogical, quit investing and protect your wealth. None of us can fix the problems, so take individual action (personal responsibility) to protect yourself and immediate family.

It appears that the communitarians have made individualism anti-social behavior that must be stamped out at any and all costs. And it is happening on a global scale. The communitarians have declared you an asset and therefore your possessions are community property available for distribution based upon the dictates of the self-proclaimed leadership. The individual is a threat to the (bowel) movement because the individual is not constrained to the communitarian herd-think.

And always keep your mouth shut. Your friends, family and neighbors are your security risks. And the worse of all are your children; "My daddy can beat your daddy." The government is so screwed up now that they couldn't coordinate getting out of a rainstorm. Besides, personal assets get sold, traded and used up. Especially when the cash flow ceases.

Your family's survival and success depends on you becoming an Anti-communitarian. Web-search for the Anti-Communitarian League (ACL) and Niki Rapaana. The ACL is the primary source while the rest just hitched their broke-down wood cart to Niki's research. They plagiarized her work for personal gain.

Communitarianism is all about command and control of the herd. If you are not inner circle, you are suppose to be herd. The herd must be kept docile while they queue up to the slaughterhouse. All men over the age of 18 must register for the draft.
Rate :   1  2Rating :   -1
EmailPermalink
i took your advice and looked into the ACL. What i came up with was rather disappointing. There was no end to the things that they are against, but there was no statement of what they stand for, though that could be inferred from what they are against.

The entire gist of it would appear to be that they are against Agenda 21, a non-binding U.N. action plan to promote sustainable growth. It would seem to me that Niki does not get what non-binding means. If it were a binding agreement, it is highly unlikely that virtually every member nation would have agreed to it. i mean, from what is on the ACL site, they believe that the plan calls for national governments to give up their sovereignty and let's get real here, there is no way that 168 countries would ever agree to that; especially since quite a few of them were ruled by dictators who have shown themselves ready to murder their own citizens in large numbers rather than relinquish power. So why would they have willingly given it up to the U.N.? It makes no sense.

There does not appear to be anything in the U.N. agreement that requires everyone over the age of 18 to register for the draft. And why would there be? This is a plan for individual cities or regions, not national governments. [Rangle's bill to bring back the draft was a crass political ploy in response to America's needlessly expensive war in Iraq (heavy reliance on contractors) and got voted down tout de suite.]

With regard to the supposed notion that your assets are not really yours, what is meant by that is nothing new. There is nothing in Agenda 21 that states that you must hand over your gold if the local government asks for it. The ACL would seem to be making much ado about the long and well established principle of imminent domain. i do not know of any jurisdiction anywhere in the world where the government cannot expropriate your land if they believe it is in the public interest. This goes back hundreds of years and was not something cooked up in Rio in '92.

And i must say that i was disheartened to find one of the contributors is Gary Kah. If ever there was a Jew hating crackpot with a strong messianic complex, Kah fills the bill. i loathe all religious zealots with a passion and i reserve a special level of hatred for that supercilious asshole.

Do not get me wrong, for i am as an iconoclastic an individual that you will ever meet and someone who definitely marches to the beat of my own drummer. And i most certainly agree that one should be as self reliant as possible. But i in no way feel my individuality to be threatened in the slightest by those who would promote sustainable development. Indeed, i believe sustainable development is a good thing, not some evil to be combatted.

Rate :   1  0Rating :   1
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
"I'm always surprised by how an entire culture can collectively believe in something that no individual would ever hold to be true." I think it was Nietzsche that said something like, "Insanity is rare in individuals but the rule for people in groups."  Read more
overtheedge - 8/28/2013 at 8:48 PM GMT
Rating :  1  2
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Take advantage of rising gold stocks
  • Subscribe to our weekly mining market briefing.
  • Receive our research reports on junior mining companies
    with the strongest potential
  • Free service, your email is safe
  • Limited offer, register now !
Go to website.