Improving Your
Perspective On Markets
We all want:
- To become
better investors.
- To
improve our ability to probabilistically forecast future market
outcomes.
- To
reduce daily investment stress.
- To
sleep better at night.
If any of the points
above apply to our current investment circumstances, it is highly unlikely
these issues will be addressed unless we are willing to take an honest
inventory of our current approach to the financial markets.
Topic Is Timely
Stocks have been holding
up relatively well in recent weeks. However, an inflation report released
Wednesday could bring the markets closer to the bearish vigilante scenario
outlined on May 7, which highlights the relevance of today's
interrelated topics of ego, bias, and the all-important concept of investment
flexibility. From USA Today:
Wholesale prices rose
sharply last month, driven up partly by higher prices for meat and other
foods. The producer price index, which measures changes in the prices of
goods and services that companies buy, increased 0.6% in April, the Labor
Department said Wednesday. Although inflation remains low, wholesale prices
last month were up 2.1% on an annual basis. That's the biggest 12-month
increase in more than two years and close to the Federal Reserve's 2% annual
inflation rate target.
Standard Issue Ego Is An Investor's Enemy
Investing successfully is
one of the most challenging tasks on the planet. The financial markets are a
difficult nut to crack; one that has frustrated even the most gifted doctors,
lawyers, economists, and money managers for all of investment history. A
major step in the journey to producing more favorable investment results
comes when we are able to step outside ourselves and understand how our ego
fits into the investment puzzle. From Eclectic Energies:
We don't feel particularly
safe with ourselves, though it may not always be that obvious. We often are
protecting ourselves, in one way or another, from some kind of hurt.
Psychology calls this self-protection "defense." We perceive
threatening events or feelings as "attacks" that we need to
"defend" from. It is the ego's primary activity. It seems more
noticeable by others than by us that this self-protection can be more
important than the truth.
The Truth, Investment Success, And Our Egos
When we talk about ego in
an investment context, we are talking about the intense human desire for our
opinions and stance to be confirmed by the markets and other human beings. In
short, we all want to be right. If we are to become more relaxed and better
investors, we need to have a healthy and sound understanding of what "being
right" means. Experienced investors who got tired of common investment
missteps started a process of ongoing improvement by seriously contemplating
this question:
What is more
important to me: (a) protecting and growing my capital, or (b) protecting my ego?
This passage from
Eclectic Energies is the root of many investment missteps:
Self protection can be
more important than the truth.
Once we decide that
protecting and growing our capital is more important than protecting our ego,
it becomes much easier to say to ourselves:
I have been humbled
time and time again by the markets. It is time to take a step back and figure
out what is really important in terms of improving my odds of investment
success.
What Determines The Value Of Our Investments?
If we want to be more
successful in the markets, it is logical that we need to understand how
markets work. More specifically, if we want to improve our odds of investing
in things that "go up", then it makes sense to understand why some
investments go up and some go down. Understanding how asset prices are set is
key to understanding the "truth" in the financial markets. If you
are a regular reader and are comfortable with how asset prices are set, you
may want to skip down to the section titled Stress Reducing Realization
or even down to Bias Can Still Be An Issue. For readers new to the
fold, the sections that follow are integral to the master topic two-faced
investing.
Markets Are The Truth, Not Our Opinions
Before we can talk about
personal bias and the value of becoming a two-faced investor, it is important
to understand the significance of personal opinions. Some simple math and a
few charts can help establish a reference point for our personal views. Technical
analysis is the study of charts, but it is more accurate to say:
"Technical
analysis is the study of the market's pricing mechanism."
If we want our
investments to increase in value, it is important to understand how that will
be determined in the real world, which has very little to do with our
personal opinions or ego. Technical analysis (TA) often gets lumped together
with voodoo and palm reading. The power of charts, and why they are used by
the vast majority of pension and hedge funds, is they allow us to monitor the
mechanism that sets asset prices. If you understand how assets prices are
set, then the value of monitoring charts is easy to understand.
A Different Way To Approach Investing
An asset pricing example
will quickly put our personal opinions in the proper perspective, which will
immediately take pressure off our ego's desire to be right all the time. Let's assume we run a controlled market experiment where:
- We
give 1,000 investors an annual report to read for company XYZ.
- All
1,000 are asked to read the report and then value the stock.
- Stock
XYZ can only be traded or owned by these 1,000 investors.
The Market Does Not Care What You Think
If I am one of the 1,000
investors in the experiment, how relevant is my personal opinion in terms of
how the price of stock XYZ is set in the marketplace? In simplified terms, my
personal take on the value of XYZ impacts the price by roughly 0.10%
(1/1000). Stated in a politically correct manner, 99.9% of the factors
impacting the price of XYZ have nothing to do with my personal analysis,
forecast, or opinion about XYZ. Said in a more direct manner, the market does
not care what "I think" about where XYZ is headed or what I think
it is worth. It sounds harsh, but that is the way markets work. Does that
mean fundamental opinions don't matter? Absolutely positively not; the
concept simply defines how fundamentals impact asset prices.
![24hGold - Want To Reduce Misst...](http://www.24hgold.com/24hpmdata/articles/img/Chris%20CiovaccoWant%20To%20Reduce%20Missteps%20Become%20A%20TwoFaced%20Investor-2014-05-15-004.gif)
If we expand the XYZ
analogy to the real world, it gets even more humbling. Facebook (FB) trades
70,500,000 shares on a typical day. It closed Tuesday at $59.83. If we assume
the average FB trade is for $10,000 worth of stock, that means the average
number of shares traded per individual transaction is 167 (10,000/59.83). A
back of the napkin estimate of the number of people that trade Facebook every
day comes to 422,155 (70.5M shares per day / 167 shares per individual
transaction). Therefore, if I am trading Facebook, the impact of my personal
opinion/research/forecast on the price of the stock is 1 divided by 422,155
or 0.00023%. The admittedly crude analysis tells us 99.99977% of Facebook's
value is impacted by external factors that are in no way impacted by what
"I think" or "what I think will happen next".
Stress Reducing Realization
If roughly 99.9% of a
liquid stock's value is determined by factors that have nothing to do with
our personal opinion, intelligence, or fundamental knowledge, then it is fair
to ask ourselves the following questions:
- Why
am I constantly trying to figure out what is going to happen next?
- Shouldn't
I be more concerned with what the market "thinks" is going to
happen next since the market determines the value of my investments?
- If
my opinion matters very little in the real world of asset pricing, then
why I am so concerned about being right all the time?
- If
the market doesn't care what I think, then maybe I shouldn't care what I
think, right?
- If
my opinion has little-to-no impact on the value of my investments, then
whose opinion does matter?
What Really
Matters?
![24hGold - Want To Reduce Misst...](http://www.24hgold.com/24hpmdata/articles/img/Chris%20CiovaccoWant%20To%20Reduce%20Missteps%20Become%20A%20TwoFaced%20Investor-2014-05-15-005.gif)
If we can answer question
5 above, then we are in a much better position to be successful going
forward. Going back to the controlled experiment with 1,000 investors, if my
opinion impacts the price of stock XYZ by only 1/1000, then whose opinion
matters most? Answer: the aggregate opinion of all 1,000 investors in the
experiment. If they are net-bullish about the future of company XYZ's stock,
then when controlled trading starts, XYZ will most likely go up. Conversely,
if the aggregate or net opinion is bearish, then when controlled trading
starts, XYZ will most likely go down. So instead of sitting down and reading
the annual report to form our own opinion on XYZ before controlled trading
starts, we would be better off walking around the conference room and polling
the other 999 participants in the experiment. Well that sounds logical, but
how are we supposed to do that in the real world when we estimated that
roughly 422,155 people per day trade Facebook? We can't phone 422,155 people
and have them answer a poll question. That is true, but we can look at a
chart of Facebook.
Using Charts As A Polling Mechanism
If the aggregate investor
opinion on Facebook determines the price of the stock, then how can we
reasonably and efficiently monitor the aggregate opinion? Monitor a chart of
Facebook. Prices are determined by the law of supply and demand. Thus, if we
think in terms of aggregate demand, it can help from a clarity perspective.
When the aggregate demand for Facebook is net bullish, the stock trends in a
bullish manner (see chart below).
![24hGold - Want To Reduce Misst...](http://www.24hgold.com/24hpmdata/articles/img/Chris%20CiovaccoWant%20To%20Reduce%20Missteps%20Become%20A%20TwoFaced%20Investor-2014-05-15-006.gif)
When the demand from
Facebook optimists is equal to the demand from Facebook pessimists, the stock
consolidates or moves sideways. The chart below shows a low-conviction market
when neither the bulls nor the bears have a clear advantage. Note the chart
below is from the present day, which tells us something about the current
state of bullish conviction vs. bearish conviction.
![24hGold - Want To Reduce Misst...](http://www.24hgold.com/24hpmdata/articles/img/Chris%20CiovaccoWant%20To%20Reduce%20Missteps%20Become%20A%20TwoFaced%20Investor-2014-05-15-007.gif)
When the aggregate demand
for Facebook is net bearish, the stock shifts into a downtrend (see below).
![24hGold - Want To Reduce Misst...](http://www.24hgold.com/24hpmdata/articles/img/Chris%20CiovaccoWant%20To%20Reduce%20Missteps%20Become%20A%20TwoFaced%20Investor-2014-05-15-008.gif)
In over simplified terms,
we can improve our odds of investment success by owning investments that are
in bullish trends and avoiding investments that are in established
downtrends. Trends monitor aggregate investor opinions. Aggregate investor
opinions, not personal opinions, set asset prices.
Bias Can Still Be An Issue
Assume we have made a
decision to add charts to our investment tool kit. Everything will be fine
now, right? It is not that easy. Why? Charts, and any new information
concerning the markets, are only helpful if we can interpret them with as
little personal bias as possible, which brings us to the two-faced investor
theme.
One-Sided Forecasting Brings Ego Into Play
If I tell you the stock
market will go up 10% in the next six months, then I will consciously or
subconsciously review new fundamental and technical information through a
"stocks will go up 10% in the next six months" lens. Conversely, if
I tell you the stock market will fall 10% in the next six months, then I will
consciously or subconsciously review new fundamental and technical
information through a "stocks are going to drop 10% lens". Annual
reports, economic data, and charts are of little value when we review them
through a biased lens. Remember, it is the market's aggregate interpretation
of the annual reports, economic data, Fed policy, etc. that determines asset
prices. Our personal interpretation means next-to-nothing.
Two-Faced Investors Are More Flexible
We all bring bias to the
markets. We will never completely eliminate personal bias. However, we can do
things to limit the negative impact of our market biases. One method to
reduce personal bias is to always respect and understand BOTH the bullish and
bearish case for the general market, economy, and any investment we hold or
are considering. It is much easier to review new information and charts of
the S&P 500 Index if we understand and respect the rationale for both
bullish and bearish outcomes. It is easy for all of us to come up with
bearish bullet points for equities. For example:
· Economic growth is tepid and
appears to be slowing.
· Geopolitical risks are increasing.
· The Fed has created
unsustainable bubbles (again).
· Housing, a
key part of the economy, is not carrying its weight.
It is easy to come up
with bullish bullet points for equities. For example:
· Bear markets typically occur
alongside recessions.
· A recession does not appear to
be imminent.
· Markets often look past
geopolitical tensions.
· Interest rates are low.
· Perceptions concerning
systemic risk have improved.
Balanced View Keeps Ego In Check
The inspiration for
covering this topic came from Twitter, where one-sided forecasting in a
public forum brings egos into play, which in turn magnifies personal bias.
Just a simple back of envelope exercise of jotting down a few positives and
negatives helps us respect both the possibility of both bullish and bearish
outcomes. Therefore, before you boldly tweet your one-sided market forecast
or tell your coworkers where the market is headed, think about how it may
impact your ego, biases, and most importantly, your ability to make the best
investment decisions possible. To stay aligned with the market's pricing
mechanism, we must maintain maximum flexibility; something that is nearly
impossible when we publish one-sided forecasts that bring our ego into the
decision making process. Another simple method to keep our egos in check is
to think in terms of probabilities, a topic covered in detail back in October 2013.
Investment Implications: The Present Day Aggregate Opinion
Using the concepts
outlined above, what is the aggregate investor opinion telling us about the
market's current risk-reward profile? The answer is not much different from
the read of the low-conviction 2014 chart of Facebook reviewed earlier in
this article. Common sense tells us when investors are very confident about
the economy and earnings growth, demand for growth-oriented stocks will
clearly be greater than the demand for more-defensive oriented bonds. How
confident have investors been since early November 2013? Answer: Not very
confident; in fact, downright indecisive according to the chart of stocks
(SPY) relative to bonds (TLT) below. If we made a friendly bet on November 4,
2013 and I picked SPY and you picked TLT, we would be tied as of May 14,
2014. The chart below tells us the desire to own SPY has been roughly equal
to the desire to own TLT, which is symptomatic of waning economic confidence.
Waning does not mean bearish, given the weight of the evidence in hand.
![24hGold - Want To Reduce Misst...](http://www.24hgold.com/24hpmdata/articles/img/Chris%20CiovaccoWant%20To%20Reduce%20Missteps%20Become%20A%20TwoFaced%20Investor-2014-05-15-012.gif)
If the market is not
willing to make a big bet on stocks relative to bonds, nor is it willing to
make a big bet on bonds relative to stocks, then it is prudent to have a
diversified portfolio of stocks (SPY), bonds (TLT), and cash, which is what
we have at the present time. From Bloomberg:
"The indices are
hitting all-time highs, but underneath that there's a big divergence
happening with individual stocks," Patrick Spencer, London-based head of
equity sales at Robert W. Baird & Co., which oversees more than $100
billion, said in an interview. "There are concerns about the market
having rallied so far, the underlying weakness in some of the momentum
stocks, and there is also some underlying worry about earnings and economic
data."
While it may be a bit
extreme for an investment application, author Andrew Samuels captures the highly influential
nature of our egos and why it is difficult to remain a flexible and unbiased
investor:
"People's need
to protect their own egos knows no bounds."
Are Charts More Important Than Fundamentals?
Critics of technical
analysis often mistakenly believe that using charts discounts the importance
of fundamental data, such as earnings, employment, and economic growth.
Charts allow investors to monitor the aggregate investor interpretation of
all the fundamental data, including Fed policy. Said another way, charts are
efficient tools used to monitor vast amounts of fundamental data, which is
important since fundamentals ultimately determine which asset classes will
perform best. When the economy is healthy, stocks tend to beat bonds. When
economic fear dominates, bonds tend to beat stocks. Therefore, fundamentals
are important since they drive asset prices. Charts are simply a tool to help
us monitor the aggregate interpretation of the fundamentals, which ultimately
determines the value of our investments.