I have a 3 year old boy. I love him tremendously. He is very
verbal, quite a thinker, very funny, sweet and thoughtful and considerate of
others. He'll be 4 in less than two months, and his mom and I know that
we have to increase his social skills, so this past week, I enrolled him into
preschool. The goal is to aid his socialization, to help him to learn
to get along with other children his age. He will learn to not hit, not
push, not bite others. And he'll learn to play well and talk with other
kids. He'll learn how to be social with kids his own age.
We are not sending him to
preschool to learn how to steal. There's no specific instruction there
on how to extort others. He's not going there to learn how to bully
others. He's not going to learn how to oppress others. Those are
all anti-social behaviors.
Why then do we call a certain
kind of political belief, "socialism"? When it's nothing of
the sort?
Is theft social?
No? Right. It's not. I think we can all agree on the
definition here that theft is anti social behavior. Socialism is
institutionalized theft. Why then don't they call it
"anti-socialism"? That would be the more literal and more
accurate description.
Ah. I have an answer to my own
question. I think that the ones who name it, control the press, and
gave it the improper name on purpose, to make it sound good. Nobody
would be for "anti-socialism", because that sounds bad. And
IS BAD!
(And to communicate
effectively, I must play along, and use the same term, they way they do, in
the normal sense, most of the time.)
Now, before you criticize my
political beliefs, be careful to understand what I do believe. The
opposite of socialism is not "George Bush neo con
Republicanism". I've been writing for over ten years. Not
once will you ever find where I wrote a single nice thing about Bush.
The opposite of statist totalitarian socialism would be libertarianism, free
market laissez faire (hands off) capitalism and freedom.
This brings up another topic.
The mainstream press tends to
label those who advocate free trade as "individualists" or
"isolationists". I believe Ayn Rand's objectivism was called
individualism. They have called Ron Paul an isolationist. It's a
nonsense label.
How can an individual trade
with others in isolation? Those labels make no sense for people who
believe in the value of trading with other people or nations.
In actual fact, the political
advocacy of principles such as "leave us alone" and "don't
steal from me" and "let me trade with others in peace" should
be called socialism. After all, it's good and social to believe that
oppression and theft are wrong. It's a very social skill to learn how
to get along well with others, such as by trading with them.
There is only one political
philosophy that actually cares about the good for all people, that could
actually and legitimately be called "socialism". It's Ron
Paul Republicanism, libertarianism, it's free market laissez faire
capitalism, and it's true freedom.
People will either thrive
under freedom (that's social), or wither under slavery and government
oppression (that's anti-social). The correct political opposites
are really that simple.
Now, I'm not saying this in
order to change the dictionary definition of the words we use in
discussions. That would lead to confusion. No, I write because I
know that once truth gets into a person's brain, it is never lost again, and
you can't shake it out, and it becomes useful forever. I don't know yet
exactly how this truth will be useful, but there it is for your wonder and
enjoyment.
I also bring this up, because
I'm surprised I never remember reading it anywhere else. Why is
that? I find that fascinating. I'm amazed by the entire process
of insights. I'm sitting here myself a bit flabbergasted, wondering why
I never thought of this before now. It seems so obvious.
Socialism is completely anti-social. It makes perfect sense.
Freedom is the only system that benefits people and is actually social.
Of course!
I also think that it's worthy
to point out a clear example that so clearly illustrates that we live in a
society that is hell bent on brainwashing us through the misuse of words, on
purpose, to confuse us.
As a final example, the
"dollar" used to be a measure of silver. Then, a
"dollar" became a promise to deliver that measure of silver on
demand. Then, a "dollar" meant nothing at all. Today,
silver is measured in troy ounces. And a real silver dollar now costs
about $24, showing again, how deceivers and bankers do their work by
mis-defining and re-defining terms as they go along, as they have always
done.
We buy and sell silver and
gold at free market fair prices: www.jhmint.com.
=====
I strongly advise you to take possession of real gold and silver, at anywhere
near today's prices, while you still can. The fundamentals
indicate rising prices for decades to come, and a major price spike can happen
at any time.
JH MINT & Coin Shop
13241 Grass Valley Ave
Grass Valley, CA 95945
(530) 273-8175
www.jhmint.com
Minimum telephone order $5000 for free shipping, USA shipping only.
Open 10AM to 5PM Pacific Time, Monday to Friday, closed weekends and bank
holidays. (Also Closed from Dec. 25th to Jan 1st)
Kerri handles internet phone orders:
kerri@jhmint.com
(530) 273-8822
NEW Location in Auburn,
CA!
JH MINT Silver & Gold
1760 Highway 49 A140
Auburn, CA 95603
(530) 889-1086
www.jhmint.com
You can also buy silver from my mom atwww.momssilvershop.com
Mom will ship overseas, even large orders up to $300,000 or larger, and also
in lots of more or less than 100 ounces.
3510 Auburn Blvd #12
Sacramento, CA 95821
Sincerely,
Jason Hommel
www.silverstockreport.com
www.bibleprophesy.org
|