|
In our 18th September Update we said that the Fed's decision not
to "taper" was not, in and of itself, meaningfully bullish for
gold. The economic effects of $85B/month of asset monetisation are not
materially different from the economic effects of $70B/month of asset
monetisation. They both constitute ultra-easy monetary policy, and in any
case the investment/speculative demand for gold is boosted by the negative
effects of monetary inflation rather than the monetary inflation itself. The
fact that the Fed chose not to scale back its money-pumping program at this
time could, however, be fundamentally bullish for gold if it reflects inside
knowledge on the part of the Fed about problems in the banking industry
and/or results in a sustained reduction in Fed credibility (as neatly put by
Jim Grant, gold's value is the reciprocal of confidence in the central bank).
The link between the gold market and the perceived health of the banking
industry is illustrated by the following chart comparison of gold and the
BKX/SPX ratio (bank stocks relative to the broad stock market). The chart reveals
a tendency over the past three years for gold to trend in the opposite
direction to the BKX/SPX ratio on an intermediate-term basis, meaning, for
instance, that gold has tended to strengthen during 6-12 month periods when
bank stocks have been weakening relative to the broad stock market. The chart
also reveals that there can be significant short-term deviations from the
aforementioned intermediate-term relationship.
We've mentioned in previous commentaries that it is very difficult to apply
the relationship between gold and the BKX/SPX ratio as a real-time indicator
of a trend change. The reason is that when one or the other of these entities
changes course there will be no way of knowing at the time whether the course
change is a short-term correction to a continuing intermediate-term trend or
an intermediate-term trend reversal. For example, the decline in the
BKX/SPX ratio during the second quarter of 2012 was large enough to be the first
downward leg in a new intermediate-term decline, but it turned out to be
nothing more than a correction to a continuing intermediate-term advance.
Having said that, a reversal in gold stands a much better chance of having
intermediate-term significance if it is confirmed by a reversal in the
BKX/SPX ratio, and a reversal in the BKX/SPX ratio stands a much better
chance of having intermediate-term significance if it is confirmed by a
reversal in the gold market. To put it more succinctly, short-term reversals
in gold and BKX/SPX are more likely to have intermediate-term significance if
they confirm each other. For example, the fact that the BKX/SPX decline
during Q2-2012 was not confirmed by a gold rally was a clear sign that it was
a short-term correction rather than an intermediate-term trend change, and
the fact that the gold rally during Q3-2012 was not confirmed by a BKX/SPX
decline was a clear sign that it was a short-term correction rather than an
intermediate-term trend change.
The interesting thing right now is that gold's rebound from its late-June low
has coincided with a decline in the BKX/SPX ratio. In other words, the
relationship between gold and the banking sector's relative strength suggests
that an intermediate-term trend change happened during June-July.
The upshot is that while gold investors should be financially and emotionally
prepared for gold to test its June low within the coming 1-2 months, a price
decline of that magnitude is probably not going to happen.
|
|