|
|
Before the US House of Representatives Committee on
Financial Services Monetary Policy and Rising Prices, March 17, 2011
There is perhaps no topic as important to the average
American today as rising prices. Whether we consider food, gasoline, or
clothing, the cost of living is increasing significantly. At a time of high
unemployment, rising prices trap American families between a rock and a hard
place. While rising prices colloquially are referred to as
"inflation," true inflation is defined as an increase in the money
supply, and all other things being equal, an increase in the money supply
leads to a rise in prices. Inflation is and always has been throughout
history a monetary phenomenon, and its destructive effects have ruined
societies from the Roman Empire to Weimar Germany to modern-day Zimbabwe.
Blame for the most recent round of price increases
has been laid at the feet of the Federal Reserve's program of quantitative
easing, and rightly so in my opinion. This program, known as QE2, sought to
purchase a total of $900 billion in US Treasury debt over a period of 8
months. Roughly $110 billion of newly created money is flooding into markets
each month, markets which still have not fully recovered from the financial
crisis of the last few years. Banks still hold billions of dollars in
underperforming mortgage-backed securities on their books, securities which
would render numerous major banks insolvent if they were "marked to
market." These nervous banks are hesitant to loan out further money,
instead holding well over a trillion dollars on reserve with the Fed. Is it
any wonder, then, that the Fed's new hot money is flowing into commodity
markets?
The price of cotton is up more than 170% over the
past year, oil is up over 40%, and many categories of food staples are seeing
double-digit price growth. This means that food, clothing, and gasoline will
become increasingly expensive over the coming year. American families, many
of whom already live paycheck to paycheck, increasingly will be forced by
these rising prices into unwilling tradeoffs. Rising prices lead to consumers
purchasing ground beef rather than steak, drinking water rather than milk, and
choosing canned vegetables over fresh. Clothes are worn until they are
threadbare, in order to conserve money that keeps food on the table and pays
the heating bill. While some might argue that this new frugality is a good
thing, frugality is virtuous only when it results from free choice, not when
it is forced upon the citizenry by the Fed's ruinous monetary policy.
While the Fed takes credit for the increase in the
stock markets, it claims no responsibility for the increases in food and
commodity prices. Even most economists fail to understand that inflation is
at root a monetary phenomenon. As the supply of money increases, more money
chases the same amount of goods, and prices rise. There may be other factors
that contribute to price rises, such as famine, flooding, or global unrest,
but these effects on prices are always short-term, not long-term.
Consistently citing rising demand, bad weather, or energy supply uncertainty
while never acknowledging the effects of monetary policy is a cop-out. Governments
throughout history have sought to blame price increases on bad weather,
speculators, and a whole host of other factors, rather than acknowledging the
effects of their inflationary monetary policies. Indeed, tyrants of many
stripes have debased their nations' currencies while denying responsibility
for the suffering that results.
The unelected policymakers at the Fed are also the
last to feel the effects of inflation, in fact, they benefit from it, as does
the government as a whole. Inflation results in a rise in prices, but those
who receive this new money first, such as government employees, contractors,
and bankers are able to use it before prices begin to increase, while those
further down the totem pole suffer price increases before they see any of this
new money. By reducing the purchasing power of the dollar, the Fed's monetary
policy also harms savers, encouraging reckless indebtedness and a more
present-oriented pattern of consumption. Hard work and thrift are punished,
so economic actors naturally respond by spending more, borrowing more, and
saving less. After all, why save rapidly depreciating dollars?
We must also remember that those policymakers who
exercise the most power over the economy are also the least likely to
understand the effects of their policies. Chairman Bernanke and other members
of the Federal Open Market Committee were convinced in mid-2008 that the
economy would rebound and continue to grow through 2009, even though it was
clear to many observers that we were in the midst of a severe economic
crisis. Chairman Greenspan before him was known for downplaying the
importance of the growing housing bubble, even while it was reaching its
zenith. It remains impossible for even the brilliant minds at the Fed to
achieve both the depth and breadth of knowledge necessary to enable
centralized economic planning. As Friedrich von Hayek stated in his Nobel
Prize address:
"The
recognition of the insuperable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to teach
the student of society a lesson of humility which should guard him against
becoming an accomplice in men's fatal striving to control society – a
striving which makes him not only a tyrant over his fellows, but which may
well make him the destroyer of a civilization which no brain has designed but
which has grown from the free efforts of millions of individuals."
Ron Paul
www.house.gov/paul
Copyright Dr. Ron
Paul
|
|
