The Federal
Reserve finally mustered the courage to end its radical
zero-interest-rate-policy experiment this week. Its quarter-point
rate hike announced on the seventh anniversary of ZIRP kicks off the
long road to normalization. This leaves the stock markets and gold
in unprecedented uncharted territory. The Fed has never before
attempted to exit ZIRP, let alone in the midst of such extremely
distorted markets.
The Fed’s ZIRP
saga symmetrically ended 7 years to the day after it began way back
in mid-December 2008. That was just after the dark heart of that
year’s once-in-a-century stock panic, which struck terror into the
Bernanke Fed. The benchmark S&P 500 broad-market stock index (SPX)
had plummeted 30.0% in a single month in October, and then
plunged another 11.4% from those brutal lows in the subsequent
month.
The Fed deeply
feared the sudden loss of 3/8ths of Americans’ stock-market wealth
would cast the US into a new Great Depression. History has proven
the stock markets have a powerful wealth effect on consumer
spending, which drives over 2/3rds of the US economy. As stock
markets drop, people feel poorer and more financially vulnerable so
they slash their own purchasing. That slows the entire economy.
So in late October
2008 just a couple days after that initial 30% SPX plunge, the Fed
slashed its federal-funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00%. But
this frantic easing proved insufficient to stop the panicked mass
exodus from stocks, so the Fed slammed its monetary accelerator to
the floor at its next meeting in mid-December. It gashed the FFR an
extreme 100bp lower to zero for the first time in the Fed’s
95-year history!
The Fed promised
this was a temporary crisis measure, as ZIRP is extremely
abnormal and unhealthy for the markets and economy. Zero rates
destroy the normal balance between saving and borrowing, radically
distorting capital allocations. The longer rates are forced down to
artificial lows, the greater the warping from normal market
conditions. Yet the Fed still inexplicably left ZIRP in place
for 7 freaking years!
So its
long-overdue decision to tentatively start normalizing rates this
week is truly momentous. Looking back on this in future years, the
end of ZIRP will likely prove to be one of the most-important events
in US financial-market history. Its implications for the global
markets, including the US stock markets and gold, are profound. As
both ZIRP and its end are wildly unprecedented, the markets are
entering a new frontier.
This week’s rate
hike may only have been 25bp, but its impact will be vast beyond its
deceivingly-trivial headline size. Technically the Fed’s ZIRP
experiment wasn’t quite zero, as the Bernanke Fed all those years
ago established a federal-funds-rate target range from 0.00%
to 0.25%. The actual average FFR in those 7 years since was 13
basis points, not quite zero. This helps frame the enormity of this
week’s hike.
Wednesday, the
Yellen Fed established a new FFR target range of 0.25% to 0.50%. So
even at the low end of 25bp, this essentially doubles the overnight
interest rate of the past 7 years! And if the Fed again forces the
FFR to the midpoint of its new target range, it would nearly triple
to 38bp. A doubling or even tripling of short-term rates is
an astounding hike, especially after they’ve had so long to become
entrenched.
The Fed actually
doesn’t directly control the federal-funds rate, as it’s technically
a free-market interest rate determined by federal-funds supply and
demand. That’s the key market where commercial banks borrow and
lend their cash reserve deposits held at the Fed on an overnight
basis. In order to bend the FFR to its will, the Fed has to
actually directly buy and sell federal funds through open-market
operations.
After 7 years,
many trillions of dollars of short-term debt has been priced for
a ZIRP world. This gives zero rates extraordinary inertia that
won’t be easy to overcome. To force the FFR to double or triple,
the Fed is going to have to suck out hundreds of billions of dollars
of liquidity from the markets. At least one elite Wall Street bank
claims the Fed will have to remove over a trillion dollars to
implement this ZIRP-slaying hike!
So a quarter point
coming off of 7 years of ZIRP is gargantuan, maybe even epic. Its
implications for the financial markets won’t be fully apparent for
weeks or months. Wednesday’s kneejerk euphoria from stock traders
immediately after this universally-expected hike announcement was
terribly misplaced. Even Janet Yellen herself warned that monetary
policy takes time to affect future economic outcomes.
And despite the
end of ZIRP being a critical step towards normalizing the Fed’s
extreme easing since the stock panic, it is only an initial one.
This chart looks at the federal-funds rate and Fed balance sheet
over the past 35 years. Just as ZIRP was a radical departure from
all historical norms on the rate front, the Fed’s associated
quantitative-easing bond monetizations were even more extreme on the
BS front.
For a quarter
century before 2008’s stock panic and subsequent Fed panic to ZIRP,
the federal-funds rate averaged 5.5%. Even in the decade ending in
2007, which saw extremely low rates as well with the Fed fighting a
new stock bear, the FFR averaged 3.8%. So the Fed’s normalization
of interest rates is barely starting! Interestingly, this
latter pre-ZIRP average FFR aligns right with Fed officials’ own
expectations.
The Fed’s elite
monetary-policy-setting team, the Federal Open Market Committee,
meets 8 times per year. Every other meeting is followed by a Janet
Yellen press conference, and includes a separately-published Summary
of Economic Projections. This document includes a scatter plot
showing where all FOMC members and regional Fed presidents expect
the federal-funds rate to be in subsequent years.
Traders closely
watch this chart they call the “dots”, as it reveals the
expectations of the handful of Fed officials who actually set
monetary policy. And in this week’s version reflecting the end
of ZIRP, these guys expect the FFR to be back above 3.25% by 2018
and return near 3.50% over the longer run after that. This would
take 13 more 25bp rate hikes to achieve, so this new Fed tightening
cycle is just starting.
Provocatively the
Fed may never be able to fully normalize though. One of ZIRP’s
worst misallocations of capital occurred at the US government, where
record-low rates encouraged exploding borrowing by the Obama
Administration. The resulting record federal-debt levels mean
interest payments at historical normal rates would literally
bankrupt the US government! The
Fed’s US debt
bomb makes normalization impossible.
Nevertheless,
interest rates are still heading higher in the coming year. The
dots show Fed expectations for next year’s FFR between 1.00% and
1.25%. And assuming the markets actually cooperate enough to indeed
allow the Fed to hike to 125bp, that would leave the FFR nearly
an order of magnitude higher than the past 7 years’ 13bp! So
even a weak partial normalization has vast implications for world
markets.
And while we’re
here, check out the Fed’s epic balance-sheet explosion since the
stock panic. Once the Fed forced short rates to zero, it couldn’t
cut any more. Economists call this hitting the zero lower bound.
But since the Fed wanted to keep easing beyond ZIRP, it started
quantitative easing in concert. QE is creating new money out of
thin air to buy bonds, the mechanism the Fed used to force down
long rates.
By printing money
to purchase bonds including US Treasuries, the Fed artificially
increased demand for these bonds. That drove up their prices which
pushed down their yields. The Fed used QE to actively manipulate
the long end of the yield curve just like ZIRP manipulated the short
end. FOMC statements since 2008 brazenly admitted forcing long
rates lower was QE’s goal, it was certainly not done in stealth.
The Fed conjuring
up new money to buy trillions of dollars of bonds was classic
debt monetization, the stuff seen in banana republics before
their monetary systems collapse. All those bonds ballooned the
Fed’s balance sheet incredibly as they piled up there. In 2007
which was the last normal year before 2008’s stock panic, the Fed’s
balance sheet averaged $830b. Its latest read was a staggering
$4442b!
If the Fed’s
balance sheet had grown at its normal rate over the last 7 years, it
would only be around $1.2t today. Instead it has multiplied 5.4x
higher to $4.4t, thanks to extreme QE debt monetizations up over
$3.6t! A full normalization of the Fed’s balance sheet would
require it to sell those trillions of dollars of monetized bonds to
remove that vast new money supply. Sooner or later, the Fed has to
start unwinding QE.
And provocatively,
this week’s FOMC statement paved the way for that. For the first
time ever, the Fed started to signal the coming reduction of
its balance sheet! It said it anticipates maintaining its massive
monetized bond holdings “until normalization of the level of the
federal funds rate is well under way.” Just like it did before
ending ZIRP, the Fed just started laying the psychological
groundwork for reversing QE.
The financial
markets have never before witnessed a Fed liftoff from the zero
lower bound, let alone a wildly-outsized Fed balance sheet
contracting. The slow normalization of rates and money supplies
will begin to reverse the radical market distortions created by
them. And that has enormous implications for the global markets,
including the US stock markets and gold. Investors need to take Fed
tightening very seriously.
The primary market
impact of those extraordinary 7 years of ZIRP and QE was an
astonishing levitation of the US stock markets. The
correlation
between the S&P 500 level and the size of the Fed’s balance
sheet since early 2009 is stellar. The stock markets rallied
dramatically whenever the Fed monetized debt, then corrected sharply
once those new monetizations abated. Stock markets’ dependency on
Fed easing is ominous.
ZIRP and QE
conspired to artificially boost the stock markets from multiple
fronts. With both short and long interest rates forced down to
contrived lows, investors were coerced to deploy capital in stocks
just to survive a record-low-yield world. ZIRP itself greatly
contributed to the stock-market levitation through the mechanism of
record-low corporate borrowing rates fueling universal enormous
corporate stock buybacks.
Since ZIRP
destroys the healthy balance between savers accumulating capital and
debtors seeking to use it, the underlying economy isn’t healthy.
It’s riddled with all kinds of mal-investment in things the world
doesn’t need, which retards economic growth. So US companies had a
tough time growing their revenues during the zero-rate era.
Underlying demand for their goods and services just wasn’t strong
enough.
So they resorted
to the pure financial engineering from stock buybacks to
foster the illusion of rising profits. Elite US corporations
borrowed trillions of dollars near record-low rates in the ZIRP
era to use to buy back their own stocks. This direct purchasing of
shares greatly boosted stock prices, as buybacks have been the
primary source of stock demand in recent years. ZIRP fueled the
stock-market levitation!
Buybacks naturally
reduce the number of shares outstanding, which creates the
appearance of growing profitability. Investors and analysts always
look at earnings per share instead of total profits.
Spreading actual earnings across fewer shares boosts EPS, so stock
buybacks proportionally raise this dominant profitability
benchmark. Higher EPS also lowers valuations, since it is the
denominator of price-to-earnings ratios.
By ratcheting up
corporate borrowing costs, the end of ZIRP really tilts the
economics unfavorably for debt-financed stock buybacks. Waning
buybacks will torpedo one of recent years’ most important if not the
most important source of overall stock demand. That buyback slump
alone will almost certainly slay the Fed’s extraordinary
stock-market levitation since early 2013. Slowing buybacks will
also increase valuations.
With the
buyback-fueled shrinkage in outstanding share counts greatly abating
or even reversing, the corporate earnings are going to be spread
across more shares lowering EPS. Lower earnings per share
forces P/E ratios higher, leading to higher stock-market
valuations. This is a menacing portent with the average P/E ratio
of the SPX component stocks
recently soaring
near 26x, already challenging 28x
bubble territory!
And right as stock
investors are confronted with waning corporate-buyback demand,
weakening EPS profiles, and higher P/E ratios, ZIRP will be boosting
competing yields in bonds. This will lead legions of yield-seeking
investors forced against their wills by ZIRP into dividend-paying
stocks instead of bonds to start migrating back into bonds.
That will put even more selling pressure on wildly-overextended
stock markets.
So contrary to the
euphoric kneejerk reaction of stock traders Wednesday on the end of
the ZIRP era, it is very bearish for today’s super-overvalued
stock markets! Extreme Fed easing directly fueled the SPX
levitation beyond 1500 starting in early 2013, so this new Fed
tightening is likely to reverse those artificial gains since. The
first Fed tightening cycle launched since June 2004 is not something
to trifle with.
Traders’ bullish
stock-market psychology is also exceptionally vulnerable today due
to an expectations mismatch. This latest FOMC meeting’s dots
imply Fed officials see 4 or 5 more 25bp rate hikes in 2016, but the
markets are currently pricing in just 3 or less. So there’s a
mounting chance of a big downside shock as traders inevitably come
around to the fact the Fed is far more hawkish than they are
betting on.
Speculators and
investors can bet on or hedge against this coming
cyclical stock
bear market that Fed tightening will exacerbate using the
leading SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF. Buying long-dated SPY put options
allows speculators to game lower stock prices, and will help
investors offset some of the resulting losses to their portfolios.
Cash and gold positions should also be accumulated leading
into a stock selloff.
And that brings us
to gold, a four-letter-word these days and the most-hated asset
class in the world. While gold held on to a nice rally the day the
Fed hiked rates, it was promptly pounded the next morning. American
futures speculators have long assumed that zero-yielding gold will
be a lot less attractive in a post-ZIRP world. They’ve been
aggressively shorting it accordingly in anticipation of this
very event.
A major side
effect of the Fed’s stock-market levitation of recent years fueled
by ZIRP and QE was the seduction of capital away from other
markets. As stock markets did nothing but rally on balance thanks
to endless Fed-official jawboning implying a Fed Put backstopping
the stock markets, investors pulled capital from other assets to
chase stocks. And gold was a major casualty, suffering withering
investment demand.
Stock traders in
particular fled gold by dumping their shares in the flagship SPDR
Gold Shares gold ETF at far faster rates than gold itself was being
sold. This epic record differential GLD-share selling in
2013 forced this ETF’s managers to
dump vast amounts
of gold bullion into the markets to raise the necessary cash to meet
redemptions. This flood of gold emboldened futures speculators to
short gold at extreme record levels.
That epic shorting
flowed and ebbed during the stock-market-levitation years,
periodically surging to new peaks that forced gold to
artificial new
secular lows. These lows weren’t fundamentally righteous
because short sellers effectively borrow gold they don’t own in
order to sell it. Every ounce shorted has to soon be repurchased to
close those shorts. So gold-futures shorting is guaranteed
proportional near-future buying.
This epic record
gold-futures short selling was supremely irrational in the midst of
the largest inflationary event in world history in the form
QE’s exploding debt monetizations. Soon these speculators with
their extreme leveraged short positions will realize this new Fed
tightening cycle isn’t going to drive gold to zero. Then they will
rush to cover. History is simply not on their side, gold tends
to thrive in Fed-rate-hike cycles!
Last week I did
a comprehensive
study showing zero-yielding gold’s performance in every
Fed-rate-hike cycle since 1971. During the exact spans of all 11,
gold achieved an outstanding average gain of 26.9%. It rallied in
the majority 6 of these, for awesome average gains of 61.0%! Gold
surged the most in Fed-rate-hike cycles when it entered them near
major lows, and their pace of hikes was the most gradual.
And that’s exactly
the situation today, with gold just off 6.1-year secular lows
entering what is promised to be the most gradual rate-hike cycle in
Fed history. But even when gold enters rate-hike cycles near major
highs and they are fast and aggressive, its downside risk remains
asymmetrically small. During the other 5 rate-hike cycles of the
modern era, gold only lost 13.9% on average. Rate hikes are
bullish for gold.
The last one bears
this out too. Between June 2004 to June 2006, the Fed made 17
consecutive rate hikes which more than quintupled its
federal-funds rate to 5.25%. If rate hikes were indeed bearish for
gold as futures speculators assume today, gold should’ve been
obliterated in such a relentless barrage blasting the FFR so high.
Yet over the exact span of that last rate-hike cycle, gold surged
49.6% higher!
How can this be
with American futures speculators so convinced rate hikes are gold’s
nemesis? Gold is a unique asset that moves counter to stock
markets, which seriously suffer when they enter rate-hike cycles
at lofty overvalued levels. So gold investment demand for prudent
portfolio diversification surges as stocks weaken. The room for
this phenomenon is vast this time given today’s
radical gold
underinvestment.
So investors and
speculators alike can position for this newest Fed-rate-hike cycle
ending the ZIRP era by buying physical gold bullion or GLD shares.
While gold’s coming gains as investors start to return will be
excellent, they will be dwarfed by the left-for-dead stocks of the
elite gold miners. They are trading near
fundamentally-absurd 13-year secular lows today, a ludicrous
disconnect from their
current
profitability.
With the first
rate-hike cycle in nearly a decade upon us, and the first time the
Fed has ever attempted to normalize out of ZIRP, the markets are in
extreme uncharted territory. It has never been more
important to do your own homework instead of blindly believing the
mainstream media’s perma-bullish hype that will lead lambs to the
slaughter. This starts with cultivating an essential contrarian
mindset on the markets.
That’s our
specialty at Zeal. We’ve long published acclaimed
weekly and
monthly
newsletters offering this crucial contrarian perspective. They draw
on our decades of exceptional experience, knowledge, wisdom, and
ongoing research to explain what’s happening in the markets, why,
and how to trade them with specific stocks. We buy low in
deeply-out-of-favor sectors when few others will so we can later
sell high when few others can as they return to favor.
Subscribe today
and get positioned for the new year!
The bottom line is
a whole new market era is upon us with the end of ZIRP. The Fed has
never before tried to normalize rates out of ZIRP, so this new
rate-hike cycle is utterly unprecedented. It is certain to have a
vast impact on the financial markets, which won’t become fully
apparent for weeks or months yet. And this is only an initial step
in the long road of reversing the Fed’s extreme monetary policies
since the panic.
Because the stock
markets were artificially levitated by the epically-easy Fed in
recent years, a tightening Fed is almost certain to reverse most of
their fundamentally-unjustified ZIRP-fueled gains. Traders need to
prepare for a new bear market in stocks. And since gold moves
counter to stock markets, investment demand is going to return
driving its price much higher in the coming years as the Fed
normalizes rates.
|