|
So
Utah's new gold & silver law marks a step towards a Gold Standard...?
IT'S NOT QUITE an April Fool's, but it's close enough.
"Gold, silver coins now officially
legal tender in Utah," reports MineWeb, along with pretty much everyone else.
"Utah's tax code says US Mint-issued gold
and silver coins are currency, rather than assets taxable by the state."
Which means – far as we can tell – no sales tax,
and goodbye to Utah's 7% capital-gains tax too. Federal US capital-gains tax
still applies. But it's a start, right
"If one state recognizes gold
as a valid currency, I think it would embolden people not just in other
states but in Washington," says one Gold Standard
advocate.
"Utah has now become the first
State on our list to actually enact a sound money bill into law," says another. Start
typing "Utah gold" into Google, in fact, and "Utah Gold
Standard" pops up as a suggested search, returning some 1.6 million
results.
Now, there a many good reasons to consider buying
gold today. But a looming return to a Gold Standard ain't
one of them. First because it ain't gonna happen. Second because, even if it did (which it
won't), an official US Gold Standard would not deliver the rapture of $5,000 or $7,500 gold which all-too
many people are starting to imagine (or promise, depending on which side of
the coin-dealer's counter they stand).
Utah's "first step", for instance, sees
the nominal face value of US Mint gold and silver coins now
worth...well...just their nominal face value. Same applies whether you're
settling your local-state taxes or buying, say, an $8 ice cream. Hand over
eight $1-face coins, and your trat will in fact
cost you nearer $217-worth of silver in today's paper bucks. Which hardly solves inflation in prices. It would only
gift you a giveaway profit if the metals had slumped so low, each coin traded
below its nominal face value...rather than many times above.
"There is nobody
– not one single person" who seems to understand what a Gold
Standard would in truth involve, writes Nathan Lewis in his New World Economics blog. Most bluntly, because a precious-metals standard means pegging the
value of money to gold or silver, not the other way round. Bullion set the
standard. The volume of cash didn't.
Great Britain's long-running Gold
Standard, for example, first set the value of each Pound as a certain
quantity of silver (hence the name Sterling). Over time, and through use, it
came to represent a certain quantity of money per ounce of gold – some
£3 17s 10½d to be precise. Over time again, and thanks to the
United States' Dollar usurping the Pound's role as the world's No.1 currency,
it then came to mean $4.86 per Pound. But only because the Dollar retained
its Gold Standard through WWI, thereby coming to represent a gold-value peg
in itself.
To repeat: Pricing Great Britain's
gold to match the volume of Pounds in circulation was never the deal. The aim
was to keep a lid (and floor) on the value of each Pound in circulation.
Because the ultimate aim was to maintain the value of cash across
time...value set by gold and silver. Their value was of course eternal. It
was not bestowed by the money of the day.
"From the middle of the
[19th] century" and as global trade volumes leapt, "the previous
concern about internal drains of gold from the Bank [of England] was replaced
by a more single-minded concern with external drains," explains monetary
historian Glyn Davies in his History
of Money. "By means of
trial and error, the Bank experimented with various devices for safeguarding
its gold reserves, the most effective of which turned out eventually to be
the combined use of bank [interest] rate with open-market operations."
Defending the Bank's gold
reserves, in other words – and thus ensuring that the Pound's ultimate
value in gold could be met by redeeming paper notes for bullion – meant
defending it against traders (or foreigners or "speculators",
depending on the day's politics) who would swap Pounds for gold bullion (or
gold for paper) whenever the gold-price of Sterling slipped below (or above)
its official value. Speculators overseas would of course need to cover the
cost of shipping out (or in) their bullion. So the Pound did in fact enjoy a
little breathing space – bounded by what became known as the
"export" and "import points". And the Bank of England's
primary tools for keeping the Pound close enough to its official value were
open-market operations – where it bought/sold Pounds or metal as
necessary – plus its interest rate.
That latter tool – the rate
of interest paid to money – decided the longer-term direction of bullion
flows, of couse. Just as it decides the longer-term
direction of currency value today. Because low rates would encourage gold
owners to seek better returns elsewhere, pulling metal out of London and thus
nudging the Pound lower. Raising rates, in contrast, would encourage metal
into Great Britain, buoying the currency in precisely that way which central
banks everywhere today are loathe to do.
Part
II to follow...
Adrian Ash
Head of
Research
Bullionvault.com
You can also Receive your first gram of Gold free by opening an
account with Bullion Vault : Click here.
City correspondent for The Daily Reckoning in London, Adrian Ash is
head of research at BullionVault.com – giving you direct access to investment
gold, vaulted in Zurich, on $3 spreads and 0.8% dealing fees.
Please Note: This article is
to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for
your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk.
Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events
– and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on
it.
|
