Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent

We Cannot Get Away from Gold or Silver

IMG Auteur
Publié le 13 mars 2014
659 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 15 votes, 4,7/5 ) , 2 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
[titre article pour referencement]
0
envoyer
2
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Editoriaux

It is remarkable how billions of human beings are using fiat currencies in the world today without any understanding at all of what they are doing. Curiosity and intellect are indeed very limited in supply amongst humans.

Humanity is living and attempting to make a living by the use of fiat currencies – gold and silver as means of interaction between humans are not available today.

And humans are quite ignorant of the fact that the fiat currencies they use have each of them a HISTORY behind them, without which they would not exist.

We humans tend today to discount History. The past has lost its meaning to us. We live entirely in the Present; what happened just a few years ago is no longer of interest, except to a very small minority of humans. History has become irrelevant; we are so engrossed with Technology, the God of the present era, that we have little urge to direct our attention elsewhere.

The Bitcoin is  - according to some at any rate - a technological marvel and should therefore do everything that is expected of it. But the fact that it may be a technological marvel is not enough, though people doubt that statement to begin with. "If the Bitcoin is a technological marvel, then surely it will have to be a brilliant success." This is optimistic thinking, but quite shallow.

The fact is that all currencies which we unthinkingly use incorporate a historic element. The digitalization of currencies does not eliminate the historic element. Digital currencies DERIVE from paper currencies, and paper currencies, ALL of them, derive from original monetary units which were various quantities of gold or silver.

Not all the technology in the world can eliminate the fact that all digital and paper currencies DERIVE from ancestral quantities of gold or silver which bore the names of the digital or paper fiat currencies we use today.

Humans appear to be willing to attribute derived values to fiat currencies, even when the derivation ascends into the many millions of units. Thus, the great inflations the world has experienced, one of the latest being that which took place in Zimbabwe.

Only when the number of units becomes totally unwieldy is the inflating fiat currency finally rejected, in favor of some alternative fiat currency (no recourse to gold or silver being possible at present.) And so we have had the Mexican peso that went into the thousands of units per fiat dollar, and prices of everything in Mexico into the millions of pesos, before the State decided to shave 1,000 units from the value of the Peso. And still it continues to devalue, now at $13,250 pre-1993 fiat pesos to the dollar, if the $1,000 peso haircut is ignored.

Zimbabwe had its currency go into 1 plus 22 zeros per dollar, before it was finally cast into the junk heap. Humanity is so tolerant!

I'd like to make the point, which I consider important, that critics of fiat currencies have been omitting the historic component of ALL fiat currencies. We are told by the Establishment gurus that gold is finished, that it can never return, that we are beyond gold in a new era of progress which gold could not sustain - the barbarous relic - but what remains unsaid is the enormous fact that ALL fiat currencies, digital and paper, remind us every day (if we care to think about it) that they are descended from gold or silver, and could not exist without this descent. So, gold and silver remain supreme, behind everything that is going on with digital and paper fiat currencies. 

We cannot get away from gold or silver! All fiat currencies, digital or paper, testify to their origin in gold or silver.

The Bitcoin is not derived from gold or silver, it is parentless and thus will not and cannot ever circulate as a type of fiat currency, no matter how perfect its technological conception.

Données et statistiques pour les pays mentionnés : Zimbabwe | Tous
Cours de l'or et de l'argent pour les pays mentionnés : Zimbabwe | Tous
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :4,7 (15 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
Excerpt: "Only when the number of units becomes totally unwieldy is the inflating fiat currency finally rejected, in favor of some alternative fiat currency (no recourse to gold or silver being possible at present.)"

Neither statement above is true. Resolution of (inevitable) banknote failures hasn't always been to replacement banknotes. Also, gold and silver can very well be re-introduced rather quickly ... with the proper groundwork laid onto which they'll rush into trade again ... at proper rational valuation.

For too many centuries and generations. we've been subliminally conditioned to disdain copper money, yet it's absolutely indispensable to support the financial 'walls' of silver's framing under the 'roof' of gold. Without copper in its proper 'base' role of small money, silver must be undervalued to suit the purpose in handy sized coin ... by turn, leaving gold too, constantly wobbling in mis-valuation and thus forcing the falsely perceived 'need' for banknotes because neither metal, even combined, comprise enough quantity to act as rational divisor for all other goods in a current market.

The American banknote for example, has two cents of its original hundred cents purchasing power remaining today. There is no good reason why all 'liquid' banknotes can't be converted to six and a half gram copper coins called 'American Currency Unit', announcing them as exchangeable pari passu for banknotes. All wages, prices, accounts and financial super-structure would remain numerically unchanged without disruption and silver would almost immediately trade between 80 to 100 of the coppers per silver-weight for daily needs of 'small money.

So, very respectfully Mr. Salinas-Price, you see 'recourse to silver and gold' is rather quite reasonably 'possible at present'.
Excerpt: "Only when the number of units becomes totally unwieldy is the inflating fiat currency finally rejected, in favor of some alternative fiat currency (no recourse to gold or silver being possible at present.)"

Neither statement above is true. Resolution of (inevitable) banknote failures hasn't always been to replacement banknotes. Also, gold and silver can very well be re-introduced rather quickly ... with the proper groundwork laid onto which they'll rush into trade again ... at proper rational valuation.

For too many centuries and generations. we've been subliminally conditioned to disdain copper money, yet it's absolutely indispensable to support the financial 'walls' of silver's framing under the 'roof' of gold. Without copper in its proper 'base' role of small money, silver must be undervalued to suit the purpose in handy sized coin ... by turn, leaving gold too, constantly wobbling in mis-valuation and thus forcing the falsely perceived 'need' for banknotes because neither metal, even combined, comprise enough quantity to act as rational divisor for all other goods in a current market.

The American banknote for example, has two cents of its original hundred cents purchasing power remaining today. There is no good reason why all 'liquid' banknotes can't be converted to six and a half gram copper coins called 'American Currency Unit', announcing them as exchangeable pari passu for banknotes. All wages, prices, accounts and financial super-structure would remain numerically unchanged without disruption and silver would almost immediately trade between 80 to 100 of the coppers per silver-weight for daily needs of 'small money.

So, very respectfully Mr. Salinas-Price, you see 'recourse to silver and gold' is rather quite reasonably 'possible at present'.
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
Excerpt: "Only when the number of units becomes totally unwieldy is the inflating fiat currency finally rejected, in favor of some alternative fiat currency (no recourse to gold or silver being possible at present.)" Neither statement above is true. Res  Lire la suite
pat.fields.16 - 14/03/2014 à 10:42 GMT
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.