Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent

Syriasly

IMG Auteur
Publié le 05 octobre 2015
744 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 21 votes, 4,7/5 ) , 2 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
2
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Editorial du Jour

Senior administration officials say the new offensive holds promise and may change the dynamics on the ground.
The New York Times

Whew…. That’s reassuring. Finally, a Middle East policy you can believe in.

It’s apparently based on a joint Kurdish-Arab army that our side (the USA) is pretending to assemble around the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa, near the Turkish border. We’re informed also that American military officials have screened the leaders of the Arab groups to ensure that they meet standards set by Congress when it approved $500 million last year for the Defense Department to train and equip moderate Syrian rebels. Thank God we have a functioning HR department over there.

Is it safe to say that the table is now set for World War Three? King Salman of Saudi Arabia is itching to mix it up. Of course, the moment he sends official KSA ground troops in there, he will be eligible to have his oil terminal at Ras Tanura in the Persian Gulf blown up. Imagine what that would do to the S & P index. The Turks, too, are none too happy with their currency imploding and their economy falling apart, and perhaps view a widened war as politically refreshing. And let’s not forget Iran — having concluded the long, torturous negotiations to make America feel better about their nuke program, Iran is eager to put an end to this barbaric (Sunni-flavored) ISIS nonsense. Oh, did I leave out Israel. Probably a good idea since so many people just want to hate on it if the subject even comes up. But suffice it to say they are in the mix, too, with the ability to turn their adversaries into ashtrays, should it come to that.

As the old song goes: someone left the cake out in the rain.

You had to at least admire the forthrightness of Mr. Putin. His economy of motion is breathtaking. He goes to the UN and says: “The situation in Syria is intolerable and we’re going to do something about it,” and a few days later they did. Russia commenced bombing groups that the US had labeled “the moderate opposition” to Bashar al-Assad. The quandary for the US, of course, as Mr. Putin pointed out at the UN, is that we keep on arming and training “moderate oppositions” to this regime and that regime and abracadabra (to use an old Middle Eastern term-of-art) they break bad on us. They use the Humvee’s we give them to control the landscape and they blow stuff up with the ordnance we give them, and cut off the heads of Americans on video in the rudest and cruelest manner imaginable. So, might we ask ourselves: is there anything to the US’s complaint that Russia is not bombing the right ISIS?

I suspect world opinion is not buying our claim that Bashar al-Assad has to go because he bombed his own citizens and used gas on them. I mean, we say that a lot, but is it actually true? US officials say a lot of things a lot that happen not to be true (e.g. the Federal Reserve’s claim that the US economy is humming.) In fact, we’re in this predicament precisely because we have squandered our credibility. We go into one country after another and destroy the institutions that held these places together, and leave a train of death and chaos behind. Iraq, Libya, Somalia, now Syria.

Maybe we just ought to step aside for a while and see what happens. The Russians could shoot themselves in the foot over there, of course. They did it before in Afghanistan. But that was back in Soviet times, with its clunky leadership. Mr. Putin proved pretty nimble in Georgia. Whatever else you can say about that little war, the region has been stable for years now. They’re not cutting off people’s heads on TV there. Similarly, you don’t hear much about Chechnyans perpetrating terrorist acts anymore.

Ukraine, for all its faults and troubles, was a stable country until the US decided to pull off regime change there. The deposed president Yanukovych was pressed into choosing between NATO and the Russian-backed Eurasian Custom’s Union and he chose wrong. The US pulled a few levers and abracadabra: civil war.

So, Assad still heads a government in Syria. We don’t like him because he is cozy with Iran, and their proxy war machine, Hezbollah. But will eliminating him make the situation any better?

Données et statistiques pour les pays mentionnés : Afghanistan | Iran | Ukraine | Tous
Cours de l'or et de l'argent pour les pays mentionnés : Afghanistan | Iran | Ukraine | Tous
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :4,7 (21 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
Could someone please state for the public record the reasons why the USA wants to overthrow the Government of Syria? The coup in Ukraine? What exactly are America's interests in doing this?
Evaluer :   1  0Note :   1
EmailPermalink
But Mr Kunstler, if we pull back from destroying countries, the ramifications would be devastating to our political-economic theater of operation.
The weapons manufacturers would have to lay off the employees.
The massive debt loads carried by not just the manufacturers of destructive devices, but also those of the employees would no longer be serviced.
The citizenry would probably demand our troops be brought home and the military would experience a massive reduction in force.
The deficit would experience a precipitous decline resulting in a who knows what kind of implosion of our economy.
And then, without a litany of enemies to fight, the citizenry just might recognize that the denizens of the Washington DC political and bureaucratic scene might just be the real enemy of our economy.
Never forget that all of this additional unemployment would create a total mess for the hard working bureaucrats tasked with fabricating make believe statistics meant to demonstrate that things are getting better.

Sir you have no idea of the difficulty that goes into maintaining the USA's status as the bully of the block.
Why even the multi-national corporations would be forced to play in the international realm without the backing of the US military.
Ye gads man, the US might get beat out of a deal by the likes of some penny-ante country like Sierra Leone, Namibia, Luxembourg or (shutter) Paraguay.
We could face an existential threat from Andorra.
Our political parties might get supplanted by the likes of every group from the Knights of Columbus to the Shriners to even members of the Sagebrush Rebellion.
None of these political outsiders know the intricacies of US capital politics and the lobbyists that work who so hard to maintain American exceptionalism.
Sir, I beseech you to think about the children who will face a new and untried paradigm without our current way of life.
They might be forced to think for themselves.
Worse of all, they might not believe what the nation needs them to believe and still be willing to fight to protect our Constitution from all designated enemies, foreign and, ... , uh well just foreign.
Evaluer :   6  0Note :   6
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
Could someone please state for the public record the reasons why the USA wants to overthrow the Government of Syria? The coup in Ukraine? What exactly are America's interests in doing this?  Lire la suite
KennyW - 06/10/2015 à 12:22 GMT
Note :  1  0
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.