Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent
Iesos
Membre depuis janvier 2013
24 commentaires -
0 abonnées
A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :
>What Americans Used To Know  - Tom DiLorenzo - lewRockwell
There are a few things you state that look like assumptions and then you mention main stream thinking. first of all:

"Let us now add to the count that you all profess to believe in God, you are all not just Christians, but evangelic Christians and the 3 of you zealously dispute the theory of evolution while touting creationism." All Christians whether Evangelical or Catholic will dispute evolution, nothing out of the main stream there. But you seem to have concluded that they are all Evangelical without any of them saying so. This to me looks like you’re making it up as there isn't one comment that both Evangelicals and Catholics wouldn't make in their posts. I do know that you hate Christians, I’ve read where you treat them as lesser beings so to me this looks like another of your attempts to discredit anyone who proclaims to be a Christian. I would say that you just made all of this up in an effort to present something to back what you’re saying.

You mention things being in the main stream when critiquing them. But you state "You all come across as believing that only gold is money." The great majority of people on this site believe gold to be money so it wouldn’t be unusual that they all believe that.

Then you put "Not one of the 3 amigos differs in the slightest when it comes to what is thought of American foreign policy or domestic politics…." Well I'm not one of them but I agree with everything they have said about the way our countries government has been interfering all over the world. This is also a mainstream item in these forums as there are posts by others with the same tone. When I look at your second post, part 2, I see nothing there that can't be named assumptions no matter how hard you try to show them as solid proof. You presented a dogs breakfast here, you’ve thrown together a bunch of nonsense and I for one don't believe any of your lengthy rants to be true. I suspect that because all three have gone after you, albeit rather harshly but certainly with less contempt than you show those you dislike, you are now trying to back pedal and regain some respect. Nothing more.


Commenté
il y a 4109 jours
-
envoyer
Début de l'article :"During the weeks following the [1860] election, [Northern newspaper] editors of all parties assumed that secession as a constitutional right was not in question . . . . On the contrary, the southern claim to a right of peaceable withdrawal was countenanced out of reverence for the natural law principle of government by consent of the governed." ~ Howard Cecil Perkins, editor, Northern ... Lire la suite
Répondre à ce commentaire
Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article8000 caractères max.
connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous
Top articles
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.