Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent
Recevez notre Marketbriefing
Dans la même rubrique
Hart
Membre depuis mai 2012
283 commentaires - suivi par 1 personne
1 abonnées
A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :
>Has The Tide Turned Against the Warmongers?  - Ron Paul - 
"Obama is not a bad person, but I do feel he is being manipulated by invisible groups in power"

An individual does not rise to the position of president of the United States by being a nice person. Make no mistake about it, Obama is as nasty as any who have preceded him in the White House. As an example, as a constitutional lawyer you would think he understands the constitution and what it stands for, would stand up for it, and abide by it but this guy has used all knowledge he possesses to get around or outright obliterate the Constitution. This is a president that hasn't lived up to one promise, he’s a war monger, if not greater than then certainly on the same level as Dubja Bush. How many wars would that be that Obama has either dragged out or started in the 5 years he's been in power? Before being elected the first time did he not promise to put a rapid end to wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan? Obviously this man has a very different idea of what it means to rapidly remove a nations military from foreign soil than the men and women that had to die there while Obama was making up his mind. War by his definition is militarily spanking some nations leader like Libya, so it’s not really a war. What he wanted to do in Syria wasn’t war, it was simply knocking the stuffing out of a sovereign nations military while engaged in a civil war because someone said the Syrian military used gas against the countries citizens. You see, the gas benefited Obama a lot more than it could ever have benefited Assad. Assad has, even still, a much higher popularity rating with his people, unlike Obama, so he had no need to use gas against nonmilitary personnel. The US however had a need to make it look like Assad used gas so they could puff up their chest, run in killing everything in sight and claim they were the good guys like in Vietnam and, well the list of other countries is getting long isn’t it?

Nice guy, I don't think so. When we look back in 15 or 20 years we'll see a better picture of just how nasty a piece of work he really is. But then, it will be too late.

It's a great thing the UK government did by rejecting the criminal military invasion of yet another sovereign middle east nation because without this 'no' vote the US would be going to war again. At least both Bush's only had one war each under their belt (ok I’m a little groggy today and maybe I forgot something) and I am in no way defending the policies of the Bush clan.


Commenté
il y a 4077 jours
-
envoyer
Début de l'article :Will the history books record these past couple of weeks as the point when the tide finally turned against our interventionist foreign policy? We began September with the Obama Administration on the verge of launching Tomahawk missiles at Syria. The missiles were needed, the administration claimed, to punish the Syrian government for using poison gas on its own people. There were reports that in addition to missiles, the administration was planning airstrikes and possibly even more mil... Lire la suite
Répondre à ce commentaire
Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article8000 caractères max.
connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous
Top articles
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.