Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent
Recevez notre Marketbriefing
Dans la même rubrique
bacq2bacq
Membre depuis mai 2012
3 commentaires -
0 abonnées
A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :
>What is Money?  - Peter Schiff - Euro Pacific Capital
How interesting to see this article arrive in my email box, as I had just published some thoughts on exactly the same topic at http://blog.bacq2bacq.com/?p=558. Gold is money.

Peter, while you point out correctly barter's problem of simultaneous need, there is something just as important, maybe even moreso in today's complex economies, namely the triangular rate of growth of the number of exchange rates in a barter-exchange system. When we have a market of N goods, we only need N "prices" if we have money. Without money, we need N*(N-1)/2 different exchange rates.

In "Debt, the First 5000 Years", David Graeber points out that the canonical barter economy we all use to explain "what existed before money" never in fact existed. We developed debt as a way to think about money before we bartered. Currency, on the other hand, was indeed our invention, but came after debt and bookkeeping.

On my blog, I argue that we did not "invent" money any more than Newton invented "position" or "velocity". The concepts existed in our brains long before Newton gave us a language to understand it all. We did not suddenly develop an ability to throw and catch objects once Newton's rules were published, our minds were already doing the math based on mass, position, velocity, and acceleration. Newton just gave us language to express what we were already doing.

The same is true of money and currency. The concept of money was in our minds before we invented currency to represent it. For our governments to both force us to use a specific currency, and further, one of widely varying and rapidly declining value, and, worst of all, further forcing us to pay interest to private bankers, just for the "privilege" of using it, well, it is like forcing us to pay bankers to use their proprietary elastic bands to measure position, when we have perfectly good, solid yardsticks instead, that are rent-free.

Is it any wonder, with measures of value so distorted, that society is confused?

Thank you for helping to get the message out, Peter.
Ben.


Commenté
il y a 4471 jours
-
envoyer
Début de l'article : Today, we're accustomed to thinking of small greenish paper rectangles as the definition of money, and we think of the US government as the only source of money.To honestly discuss sound money, we need to realize where our current money customs came from. At first, it was every man forhimself... Lire la suite
Répondre à ce commentaire
Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article8000 caractères max.
connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous
Top articles
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.