Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent
Recevez notre Marketbriefing
Dans la même rubrique
pcanon
Membre depuis mai 2012
33 commentaires -
0 abonnées
A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :
>The extraordinary lack of coverage of Ron Paul  - Eric de Carbonnel - Market Skeptics
A group of America's leading statisticians researched the 2004 presidential election and found it to be fraudulent. The press never reported on this story and it remains unknown to most Americans. Here is a link about a prominent Chicago journalist, Robert Koehler, whose articles on the topic were rejected by the Chicago Tribune: http://www.rense.com/general65/susb.htm

The press would not touch this story - although I have to say I learned about it from an op-ed column in the San Francisco Chronicle, but never again saw anything about it in the mainstream press.

Essentially, given the way pre-election coverage is run, I'd say that all our elections are now, in a way, rigged from the outset. Only those candidates who will cooperate with the oligarchy get media notice.

I love the segments on the Daily Show, in which excerpts from many mainstream tv news shows are spliced together. What these excerpts reveal is that on topic after topic the events of the day are described with exactly the same words and phrases on the evening news by several different networks simultaneously - and this happens on a routine basis. Over and over again, on the very hot issues of the day, mainstream TV journalists from different networks parrot each other on the nightly news using identical soundbites. Identical, precise. How can this be? It is impossible to believe that network journalists would coincidentally choose the exact same words to describe the issues, and do it over and over and over again, day after day after day. And yet they do. Are we to believe that there are no other word choices? It certainly appears that these identical catch phrases and soundbites cannot be anything other than pre-prepared nonsense, perhaps produced by someone in government with the clear intention of molding public perception.

The news coverage that excluded Ron Paul may not have occurred with identical wording - but his absence from their reporting was identical.

Americans are discouraged from drawing such conclusions about our government, but I honestly cannot find any other explanation for this recurring news phenomenon. The usual explanation about media being driven by the desires of advertisers certainly cannot explain it. Something else is clearly at work.

Ruling class writer, Edward Bernays, wrote about the need to mold the public mind:

http://www.oldthinkernews.com/?p=1586
"In his 1928 book Propaganda, Bernays informs readers about the true ruling class in our society.

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.

We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

They believe the public is quite stupid and because we believe what they tell us, we constantly confirm their impression, thereby inspiring more deception, more theft, more war, etc.


Commenté
il y a 4767 jours
-
envoyer
Début de l'article : Is Ron Paul Getting the Coverage He Deserves? [NO] Nick Gillespie | August 17, 2011 Reason staffers Mike Riggs and Katherine Mangu-Ward were on the television yesterday to discuss the media’s response to what might be called "The Riddle of Ron Paul": Why do major newspapers, broadcast shows, and cable news outlets seem hell-bent on ignoring a 12-term GOP congressman who came in a tight second in the Iowa Straw Poll? Indeed, the results of that hokey quadrennial exercise in corn-dog politics was used to talk up Michelle Bachmann’s legitimacy... Lire la suite
Répondre à ce commentaire
Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article8000 caractères max.
connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous
Top articles
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.