TSXV:MOO PE PEG Gauge Nov 28th 17
The oil and gas industry is trading at a PE ratio of 23x, higher than the rest of the Canadian stock market PE of 17x. This illustrates a somewhat overpriced sector compared to the rest of the market. However, the industry returned a lower 6.96% compared to the market’s 9.62%, illustrative of the recent sector upheaval. Since MOO’s earnings doesn’t seem to reflect its true value, its PE ratio isn’t very useful. A loose alternative to gauge MOO’s value is to assume the stock should be relatively in-line with its industry.
What this means for you:
Are you a shareholder? MOO has been an oil and gas industry laggard in the past year. If your initial investment thesis is around the growth prospects of MOO, there are other oil and gas companies that have delivered higher growth, and perhaps trading at a discount to the industry average. Consider how MOO fits into your wider portfolio and the opportunity cost of holding onto the stock.
Are you a potential investor? If MOO has been on your watchlist for a while, now may be a good time to dig deeper into the stock. Although its growth has delivered lower growth relative to its oil and gas peers in the near term, the market may be pessimistic on the stock, leading to a potential undervaluation. Before you make a decision on the stock, I suggest you look at MOO’s future cash flows in order to assess whether the stock is trading at a reasonable price.
For a deeper dive into Mooncor Oil & Gas’s stock, take a look at the company’s latest free analysis report to find out more on its financial health and other fundamentals. Interested in other energy stocks instead? Use our free playform to see my list of over 300 other oil and gas companies trading on the market.
To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.
The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.