Can GBE’s asset-composition point to a higher beta?
An asset-heavy company tends to have a higher beta because the risk associated with running fixed assets during a downturn is highly expensive. I examine GBE’s ratio of fixed assets to total assets to see whether the company is highly exposed to the risk of this type of constraint. Given a fixed to total assets ratio of over 30%, GBE seems to be a company which invests a big chunk of its capital on assets that cannot be scaled down on short-notice. Thus, we can expect GBE to be more volatile in the face of market movements, relative to its peers of similar size but with a lower proportion of fixed assets on their books. However, this is the opposite to what GBE’s actual beta value suggests, which is lower stock volatility relative to the market.
What this means for you:
Are you a shareholder? You could benefit from lower risk during times of economic decline by holding onto GBE. Take into account your portfolio sensitivity to the market before you invest in the stock, as well as where we are in the current economic cycle. Depending on the composition of your portfolio, GBE may be a valuable stock to hold onto in order to cushion the impact of a downturn. For more company-specific research on GBE, check out our our free analysis plaform here.
Are you a potential investor? Before you buy GBE, you should look at the stock in conjunction with their current portfolio holdings. GBE may be a great cushion during times of economic downturns due to its low beta. However, its high fixed cost may mean margins are squeezed if demand is low. I recommend taking into account its fundamentals as well before leaping into the investment. Continue your research on the stock with our free fundamental research report for GBE here.
To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.
The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.