Microsoft Word - 150930 FINAL Pahtohavare Drilling Update
ASX & MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENT
Pahtohavare Assay Results
30 September 2015
Further wide, high-grade copper-gold-silver assays from the Central deposit at the Pahtohavare Cu-Au Project including the following intercept from PADH15006:
o 12.3m @ 2.99% Cu, 0.87g/t Au, 1.66g/t Ag from 29.2m (1% Cu lower-cut, 0m internal dilution)
Figure 1: Visible copper mineralisation in core from PADH15006 annotated with copper assays; from 34.2-41.5m downhole.
Hannans Reward Ltd (ASX:HNR) is pleased to announce additional diamond drillhole assay results from the Central deposit at the Pahtohavare Cu-Au Project. Pahtohavare comprises three deposits, namely Central, Southern and South Eastern and is located approximately 8km south-west of Kiruna, a full service mining town in northern Sweden (refer Figure 4 below).
Hannans' Swedish joint venture partner Lovisagruvan AB (AktieTorget: LOVI) is funding the costs of exploration pursuant to the Joint Venture announced to ASX on 27 March 2015 with Hannans to retain a 25% free carried interest through to a Decision to Mine. The assay results reported below have been reviewed by Mr Stefan Sädbom, Exploration Director, Lovisagruvan AB and the announcement has been approved for release by Lovisagruvan AB. The Joint Venture exploration drilling program at Central was planned and managed by Amanda Scott, Exploration Manager, Hannans Reward Ltd.
Assay results have now been received for drillholes PADH15006 and also the diamond tail PARC13001D which include significant copper-gold-silver intercepts of:
PADH15006
30.43m @ 1.75% Cu, 0.49g/t Au, 1.54g/t Ag from 20.07m (0.1% Cu lower-cut, 1m internal dilution)
Inc. 12.3m @ 2.99% Cu, 0.87g/t Au, 1.66g/t Ag from 29.2m (1% Cu lower-cut, 0m internal dilution)
PARC13001D
-
18m @ 1.48% Cu, 0.36g/t Au, 0.9g/t Ag from 155m (0.1% Cu lower-cut, 1m internal dilution)
-
9m @ 0.49% Cu, 0.15g/t Au, 0.71g/t Ag from 176m (0.1% Cu lower-cut, 1m internal dilution)
The original RC assay intercept3 from PARC13001 was:
-
3m @ 4.02% Cu, 0.75g/t Au, 4.67g/t Ag from 129m (0.1% Cu lower-cut, 1m internal dilution)
Note that all widths are downhole widths as true widths are not currently known. Full drillhole information is provided in Tables 1 and 2 below.
Drillhole PADH15006, located on infill Profile F (refer Figure 2 below), was drilled towards the west which is perpendicular to the dip of the lithology. Profile F is a new infill (25m) profile and the mineralisation in PADH15006 confirms that the high-grade, strongly oxidised copper-gold-silver mineralisation continues along strike from between Profiles 6 & 7.
Continued…
Figure 2: Location of current diamond drillholes at the Central orebody, Pahtohavare Copper-Gold Project, northern Sweden
3
Refer ASX Announcement dated 17th July 2013 for more information regarding the drilling results for PARC13001 including JORC Table 1 information.
The main zone of mineralisation in PADH15006 is hosted within strongly goethite altered (oxidised/weathered) tuffaceous units. In addition to the main copper mineralised zone there are several narrower sub-economic (
In 2013, the first hole of an 8 hole RC programme was abandoned at 141m after encountering difficult drilling conditions. As part of the recent diamond drilling programme, the hole (PARC13001) was re-entered and a diamond tail was completed to a total depth of 235.3m. The hole intercepted copper-gold-silver mineralisation within a strongly goethite altered (oxidised/weathered) tuffaceous unit. As with PADH15005 (previously reported) and PADH15006, the highest grade copper mineralisation is associated with a very distinct strongly goethite altered and vughy breccia (refer Figure 3 below) where the secondary copper mineralisation (chrysocolla and malachite) is commonly present as matrix-fill. No significant primary copper mineralisation was intercepted at depth within PARC13001D although the hole terminated in a strongly altered skarn unit, typical of the Kiruna area but not previously seen at Pahtohavare.
Figure 3: High-grade copper mineralisation (malachite and chrysocolla) within strongly goethite altered breccia (PADH15005), Pahtohavare Copper-Gold Project, northern Sweden.
All drillholes from the recent diamond drilling programme have now been logged, sampled and dispatched to the laboratory for assaying; the balance of results is expected in October.
Joint venture partner Lovisagruvan AB is expected to make a decision on whether to proceed to Stage 2 of the joint venture agreement in late October.
The Central deposit contains a current JORC Compliant Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate6 of 1.4Mt at 1.8% Cu and 0.6 g/t Au (2.4% CuEq7).
6 Refer ASX Announcement dated 31st January 2014 for more information regarding the resource estimate including JORC Table 1 information.
7 Copper equivalent (CuEq) has been calculated using metal selling prices of USD$3.56 / lb for Cu and USD$1,510 / Oz for Au, along with metal recoveries of 90% for Au and 65% for Cu in sulphide material and 80% for Au and 50% of Cu in oxide material. The following equations were used:
-
Oxide: CuEq = (1.12 x Au (ppm) grade) + (0.98 x Cu% grade)
-
Sulphide: CuEq = (0.97 x Au (ppm) grade) + (0.99 x Cu% grade)
It is the company's opinion that the copper and gold metals used in the metal equivalent calculation have a reasonable potential for recovery and sale based on historical metallurgial testwork and previous mining.
Figure 4: Location of the Pahtohavare Copper-Gold Project, northern Sweden.
For further information please contact: Damian Hicks
Managing Director
+61 419 9300 087 (M)
[email protected] (E)
Amanda Scott Exploration Manager
+46 703 221 497 (M)
[email protected] (E)
About Hannans Reward Ltd
Hannans Reward Ltd (ASX:HNR) is an exploration company with a focus on copper, gold, nickel, PGE and iron. Hannans has JORC compliant copper, gold and iron resources in Sweden, a major Ni-Cu-PGE project in Sweden and a free-carried interest in a nickel project in Australia. Since listing on the Australian Securities Exchange in 2003 Hannans has signed agreements with Vale Inco, Rio Tinto, Anglo American, Boliden, Warwick Resources, Cullen Resources, Azure Minerals, Neometals, Tasman Metals and Grängesberg Iron. Shareholders at various times since listing have included Rio Tinto, Anglo American, OM Holdings, Craton Capital and BlackRock. For more information please visit www.hannansreward.com.
Competent Persons Statements
The information in this document that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Amanda Scott, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Membership No.990895). Amanda Scott is a full-time employee of Hannans Reward Ltd. Amanda Scott has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activity which has been undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Amanda Scott consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this document that relates to Mineral Resource and Exploration Target Estimates for Pahtohavare is extracted from the report entitled 'Re-Release of Maiden JORC Resource at Pahtohavare To Comply With JORC' created on 31 January 2014 and is available to view on the Company's website (www.hannansreward.com). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and in the case of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this document that relates to Mineral Resource Estimates for Rakkurijoki and Rakkurijärvi is extracted from the report entitled 'Kiruna Iron Project JORC Resource Update' created on 17 January 2012 and is available to view on the Company's website (www.hannansreward.com). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and in the case of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Table 1
|
Hole ID
|
Easting (RT90)
|
Northing (RT90)
|
Azi
|
Dip
|
EOH
|
Overb.
|
Core
|
Start
|
Finish
|
PADH15001
|
1680202
|
7528163
|
250
|
-60
|
106.9
|
6.4
|
100.5
|
24-06-15
|
01-07-15
|
PADH15002
|
1680174
|
7528179
|
250
|
-60
|
79.6
|
4.7
|
74.9
|
02-07-15
|
07-07-15
|
PADH15003
|
1680125
|
7528163
|
70
|
-51
|
49.9
|
4.8
|
45.1
|
08-07-15
|
09-07-15
|
PADH15004
|
1680124
|
7528161
|
70
|
-65
|
62.9
|
3
|
59.9
|
09-07-15
|
11-07-15
|
PADH15005
|
1680074
|
7528191
|
65
|
-55
|
72.1
|
4.2
|
67.9
|
11-07-15
|
15-07-15
|
PADH15006
|
1680136
|
7528191
|
250
|
-60
|
137.3
|
8.1
|
129.2
|
15-07-15
|
22-07-15
|
PADH15007
|
1680107
|
7528233
|
250
|
-60
|
76.8
|
2.2
|
74.6
|
22-07-15
|
24-07-15
|
PARC13001D
|
1680313
|
7528176
|
250
|
-65
|
235.3
|
RC 141m
|
94.3
|
25-07-15
|
31-07-15
|
PARC15008
|
1680300
|
7528148
|
250
|
-60
|
80.5
|
2.9
|
77.6
|
01-08-15
|
06-08-15
|
Table 1: Diamond drillhole collar summary for Central deposit, Pahtohavare Cu-Au Project. All coordinates are in Swedish RT90. Note PADH15008 was abandoned prior to reaching the target depth due to difficult drilling conditions.
Table 2
Hole Intersection Mineralisation Sample
Intercept
Hole ID
|
From
(m)
|
To
(m)
|
Down
Hole (m)
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(ppm)
|
Ag
(ppm)
|
Sample Type
|
PADH15006
|
20.07
|
20.80
|
0.73
|
1.20
|
0.03
|
1.1
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
20.80
|
21.80
|
1.00
|
1.52
|
0.65
|
2.4
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
21.80
|
22.80
|
1.00
|
1.20
|
1.53
|
2.6
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
22.80
|
24.20
|
1.40
|
0.82
|
0.2
|
1.6
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
24.20
|
25.20
|
1.00
|
1.52
|
0.09
|
1.8
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
25.20
|
26.20
|
1.00
|
1.34
|
0.16
|
1.4
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
26.20
|
27.20
|
1.00
|
0.51
|
0.25
|
1.2
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
27.20
|
28.20
|
1.00
|
1.28
|
0.17
|
1.3
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
28.20
|
29.20
|
1.00
|
0.57
|
0.28
|
2
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
29.20
|
30.20
|
1.00
|
1.86
|
0.34
|
0.7
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
30.20
|
31.20
|
1.00
|
2.49
|
0.13
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
31.20
|
32.20
|
1.00
|
1.15
|
X
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
32.20
|
33.20
|
1.00
|
1.45
|
X
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
33.20
|
34.20
|
1.00
|
2.71
|
0.09
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
34.20
|
35.20
|
1.00
|
1.28
|
0.01
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
35.20
|
36.20
|
1.00
|
1.03
|
X
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
36.20
|
37.50
|
1.30
|
2.13
|
0.18
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
37.50
|
38.00
|
0.50
|
3.12
|
1.37
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
38.00
|
38.80
|
0.80
|
17.70
|
9.87
|
20.9
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
38.80
|
39.80
|
1.00
|
2.39
|
0.11
|
0.9
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
39.80
|
40.50
|
0.70
|
2.48
|
1.65
|
1.1
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
40.50
|
41.50
|
1.00
|
2.25
|
0.08
|
1.3
|
Quarter Core-Duplicate
|
PADH15006
|
41.50
|
42.50
|
1.00
|
0.96
|
0.21
|
1.9
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
42.50
|
43.50
|
1.00
|
1.26
|
0.07
|
2.2
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
43.50
|
44.50
|
1.00
|
2.00
|
0.12
|
1.9
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
44.50
|
45.50
|
1.00
|
0.60
|
0.03
|
1.6
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
45.50
|
46.50
|
1.00
|
0.76
|
0.41
|
1.9
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
46.50
|
47.50
|
1.00
|
0.40
|
0.02
|
0.5
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
47.50
|
48.50
|
1.00
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0.6
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
48.50
|
49.50
|
1.00
|
0.09
|
0.01
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PADH15006
|
49.50
|
50.50
|
1.00
|
0.10
|
0.01
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
155
|
156
|
1.00
|
1.48
|
0.23
|
3.2
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
156
|
157
|
1.00
|
0.18
|
0.04
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
157
|
157.65
|
0.65
|
0.56
|
0.04
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
157.65
|
159
|
1.35
|
2.31
|
0.2
|
3.6
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
159
|
160
|
1.00
|
0.33
|
0.2
|
0.8
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
160
|
160.7
|
0.70
|
0.72
|
0.59
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
160.7
|
161.8
|
1.10
|
1.60
|
0.26
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
161.8
|
162.8
|
1.00
|
0.94
|
0.07
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
162.8
|
163.8
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
0.27
|
0.7
|
Half Core
|
Hole Intersection Mineralisation Sample
Intercept
Hole ID
|
From
(m)
|
To
(m)
|
Down
Hole (m)
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(ppm)
|
Ag
(ppm)
|
Sample Type
|
PARC13001D
|
163.8
|
164.8
|
1.00
|
0.43
|
0.05
|
0.7
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
164.8
|
165.8
|
1.00
|
0.42
|
0.18
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
165.8
|
167
|
1.20
|
1.12
|
0.41
|
1
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
167
|
168.3
|
1.30
|
10.05
|
2.77
|
1.6
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
168.3
|
169
|
0.70
|
1.21
|
0.25
|
1.9
|
Quarter Core-Duplicate
|
PARC13001D
|
169
|
170
|
1.00
|
0.44
|
0.08
|
0.8
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
170
|
171
|
1.00
|
0.23
|
0.02
|
0.5
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
171
|
172
|
1.00
|
0.15
|
0.01
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
172
|
173
|
1.00
|
0.11
|
0.05
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
176
|
177
|
1.00
|
0.17
|
0.06
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
177
|
178
|
1.00
|
2.50
|
0.76
|
3.3
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
178
|
179
|
1.00
|
0.28
|
0.16
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
179
|
180
|
1.00
|
0.41
|
0.2
|
1.4
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
180
|
181
|
1.00
|
0.37
|
0.06
|
1.2
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
181
|
182
|
1.00
|
0.12
|
X
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
182
|
183
|
1.00
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
183
|
184
|
1.00
|
0.11
|
0.02
|
X
|
Half Core
|
PARC13001D
|
184
|
185
|
1.00
|
0.44
|
0.08
|
0.5
|
Half Core
|
Table 2: Detailed assay results for PADH15006 and PARC13001D. Reported using a 0.1% cut-off and 1m internal dilution. Samples submitted to ALS Global (Piteå) for ME-ICPMS61 and Au-AA25 analysis.
JORC Code, 2012 Edition
Table 1, Section 1-Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as downhole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample 'representivity' and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.
In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation
Sampling method is half-core sampling of HQ3 diamond drill core. Quarter-core sampling utilised where a duplicate samples have been taken.
Sampling was carried out under Hannans' sampling protocols and QAQC procedures as per industry best practice.
Diamond drilling completed using HQ3 coring equipment. Drillholes have been sampled on geological intervals (0.5-2.0m). All samples have been crushed, dried and pulverised (total prep) to produce a sub sample for multi-element analysis by four acid digest with ICPMS/OES and fire assay and AAS for gold.
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
may be required, such as where there is
|
coarse gold that has
|
inherent sampling
|
problems. Unusual
|
commodities or
|
mineralisation types
|
(e.g. submarine
|
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
|
information.
|
Drilling
|
|
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
|
|
Diamond drilling completed by Kati Oy from
|
techniques
|
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
|
Finland.
|
Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core
|
|
Diamond drilling completed using HQ3 (triple
|
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
|
tube) core drilling equipment.
|
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
|
|
No core orientations have been taken. Downhole surveying completed using a gyroscopic survey instrument.
|
Drill
|
|
Method of recording and assessing core and
|
|
Core recoveries are measured by the drillers
|
sample
|
chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
|
for every drill run. The core length recovered
|
recovery
|
|
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature
|
is physically measured for each run, recorded
and used to calculate the core recovery as a
|
of the samples.
|
percentage of core recovered. Any core loss
|
|
Whether a relationship exists between
|
is recorded on a core block by the drillers.
|
sample recovery and grade and whether
|
|
Triple tube drilling and the use of drilling
|
sample bias may have occurred due to
|
additives has been utilised to increase core
|
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
|
recovery.
|
material.
|
|
The ore zone is located within a strongly
|
oxidised and deformed unit where core loss
|
does occur. A sampling bias has not been
|
determined.
|
Logging
|
|
Whether core and chip samples have been
|
|
All drillcore has been transported from site
|
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
|
to the SGU Core Archive located in Malå for
|
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
|
cleaning, reconnection of core lengths and
|
Resource estimation, mining studies and
|
measurement of metre marks where
|
metallurgical studies.
|
required, over the entire hole.
|
|
Whether logging is qualitative or
|
|
Geological logging has been completed on
|
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
|
the entire length of all holes by Amanda
|
channel, etc) photography.
|
Scott, Hannans' Exploration Manager, who
|
|
The total length and percentage of the
|
has significant experience in this style of
|
relevant intersections logged.
|
exploration.
|
|
The lithological, alteration and structural
|
characteristic of the core are logged in digital
|
format and following established procedures.
|
|
All data is subsequently imported into
|
Hannans' Datashed database located in
|
Perth.
|
|
All drillholes are photographed.
|
Sub-
|
|
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
|
|
All samples delivered to ALS Global in Malå
|
sampling
|
quarter, half or all core taken.
|
where the core was cut and sampled.
|
techniques
|
|
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
|
|
All samples are half-core except for duplicate
|
and sample preparation
|
|
rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet
or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation
|
|
samples in which case quarter-core samples
have been taken.
The sample preparation follows industry best practice sample preparation; the samples are
|
technique.
|
finely crushed with 70% passing
|
|
Quality control procedures adopted for all
|
reduced in a splitter whereby a reject sample
|
sub-sampling stages to maximise
|
and a 250g sample is produced. The 250g
|
representative nature to the samples.
|
sample is then pulverised with 85% passing
|
|
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
|
the sample. A sub-sample of pulp is taken for digestion in a four acid digest and fire assay for gold.
|
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
|
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the Duplicate sampling has been completed at a
grain size of the material being sampled. rate of 1:40 where practicable; duplicate
results for PADH15006 and PARC13001D are satisfactory.
Certified reference material standards have been inserted at a rate of 1:20; standard results for PADH15006 and PARC13001D are within accepted limits.
The sample sizes are considered appropriate for the type of mineralisation (epigenetic copper-gold) under consideration.
|
Quality of The nature, quality and appropriateness of All samples are assayed using a four acid assay data the assaying and laboratory procedures digest multi-element suite with ICPOES or and used and whether the technique is ICPMS finish. The acids used are hydrofluoric, laboratory considered partial or total. nitric, hydrochloric and perchloric with the tests For geophysical tools, spectrometers, method approaching near total digest for
handheld XRF instruments, etc., the mostelements.
parameters used in determining the analysis All samples are assayed for gold by firing a
includinginstrument make and model, 25g sample with an AAS finish.
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc. The analytical methods are considered
Nature of quality control procedures appropriate for this style of mineralisation. adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, No geophysical tools or handheld external laboratory checks) and whether instruments were utilised in the preparation acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of ofthis release.
bias) and precision have been established. Duplicate sampling has been completed at a
rate of 1:40 where practicable; duplicate results for PADH15006 and PARC13001D are satisfactory.
Certified reference material standards have been inserted at a rate of 1:20; standard results for PADH15006 and PARC13001D are within accepted limits.
Laboratory QAQC methods include the insertion of certified reference material standards, blanks, and duplicates.
|
Verification The verification of significant intersections by Determination of the reported downhole of either independent or alternative company interval of mineralisation has not been sampling personnel. verified by either independent or alternative
and The use of twinned holes. company personnel in person but has been assaying Documentation of primary data, data entry reviewed by the Chief Geologist, Stefan procedures, data verification, data storage Sädbom, of the Joint Venture partnervia
(physical and electronic) protocols. electronic photographicdata.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. None of the drillholes referred to in this
release have been twinned to date.
All geological and location data is currently stored in Hannans' Excel database files. Data entry has been by manual input and validation of the small amount of data has been done by checking input on screen prior to saving. All data will be forwarded to the database administrator in Perth for loading and validation into Hannans' Datashed
|
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
|
database.
No adjustments or calibrations have been made to any assay data used in this report.
|
Location of
|
|
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
|
|
Drillhole locations have been planned using
|
data points
|
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
|
a combination of GIS software packages.
|
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
|
|
Drillhole locations have been determined
|
locations used in Mineral Resource
|
using a Garmin handheld GPS unit with an
|
estimation.
|
accuracy of +/- 1m. Drill azimuths were laid-
|
|
Specification of the grid system used.
|
out with a hand-held Suunto compass that
|
|
Quality and adequacy of topographic
|
has a precision of +/- 0.5 degrees.
|
control.
|
|
Downhole surveys have been completed
|
using a gyroscopic instrument at regular
|
intervals.
|
|
Grid system is Swedish Coordinate system
|
RT90 2.5 west.
|
|
Topographic control has been established by
|
previous surveying of historic drillhole collars
|
by RTK GPS. This data has been used to
|
calibrate the Hannans' handheld GPS.
|
Data
|
|
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
|
|
The current data spacing or drill profile
|
spacing
|
Results.
|
separation is approximately 25-50m, hole
|
and distribution
|
|
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate
|
spacing varies depending on the purpose of
the drillhole but is typically 20-30m between holes within a drill profile.
|
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
|
|
The data spacing and
|
distribution is
|
estimation procedure(s) and classifications
|
considered sufficient to establish a degree of
|
applied.
|
geological and grade continuity.
|
|
Whether sample compositing has been
|
|
No sample compositing has been applied.
|
applied.
|
Orientation
|
|
Whether the orientation of sampling
|
|
The majority of drillholes
|
drilled at the
|
of data in
|
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
|
Central deposit have
|
been drilled
|
relation to geological structure
|
|
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key
|
|
perpendicular (250°) to the interpreted dip of the lithology.
The reported mineralised intercepts from PADH15006 and PARC13001D are downhole
|
mineralised structures is considered to have
|
widths and are not true
|
widths. The
|
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
|
intercepts reported may not represent the
|
assessed and reported if material.
|
true width and should be taken within the
|
context described in the preceding point.
|
Sample
|
|
The
|
measures
|
taken
|
to
|
ensure
|
sample
|
|
All drill core transport and logging has been
|
security
|
security.
|
completed
|
by
|
Amanda
|
Scott,
|
Hannans'
|
Exploration Manager. All holes are stored in
|
a locked facility.
|
Audits reviews
|
or
|
|
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.
|
|
No external audits or reviews of the sampling techniques and data have been completed.
|
Section 2-Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
The Central deposit is located on exploration permit Pahtohavare nr 2 owned 100% by Hannans' fully owned Swedish subsidiary Kiruna Iron Ab. The
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation Commentary
|
tenure status
|
royalties, native title interests, historical permit is located approximately 8km to sites, wilderness or national park and the southwest of the town of Kiruna, environmental settings. northern Sweden.
The security of the tenure held at the In March 2015 Hannans entered into a time of reporting along with any known Joint Venture Agreement with Swedish impediments to obtaining a licence to mining company Lovisagruvan Ab at the operate in the area. Pahtohavare Project. The JV is staged but Hannans will retain a 25% free
carried interest through to a decision to mine.
Exploration permit Pahtohavare nr 2 is in good standing with the local mining authority, Bergsstaten.
|
Exploration done by other parties
|
Acknowledgment and appraisal of Historical diamond drilling was exploration by other parties. completed by SGU (Swedish Geological Society) in the late 1980's. From this
drilling selected holes have been check assayed by Hannans. In 2013 Hannans released a JORC Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for the Central deposit and also completed an 8-hole RC programme. Hannans is satisfied with the previous QAQC and assay methods used by SGU.
|
Geology
|
Deposit type, geological setting and style The mineralisation at the Central of mineralisation. deposit has been classified as epigenetic copper-gold. Whilst the ore
appears to be preferentially located within a brecciated, highly altered (silica-albite) and oxidised felsic tuff, recent drilling (RC in 2013 and current diamond drilling) by Hannans has shown that copper mineralisation also occurs in the black graphitic shales sitting stratigraphically above the felsic tuff and also in the mafic sill (gabbro) which dominates the footwall. It has become apparent from the current drilling programme that there is a strong supergene control on secondary mineralisation in addition to lithological and structural controls. A new geological interpretation is required for the Central deposit as a result of the current drilling.
|
Drill hole A summary of all information material to Refer to Table 1 & 2 of this report for a
Information the understanding of the exploration summary of all appropriate drillhole
results including a tabulation of the information.
following information for all Material drill holes:
easting and northing of the drill hole collar
elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar
dip and azimuth of the hole
down hole length and interception depth
hole length.
|
Criteria
|
JORC Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
|
Data
|
|
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
|
|
High-grade significant intercepts in this
|
aggregation
|
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
|
report are based on ≥ 1% Cu and
|
methods
|
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are
|
|
include up to 1m of internal dilution.
The lower-grade, wider significant
|
usually Material and should be stated.
|
intercepts in this report are based on a
|
|
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
|
0.1% Cu lower cut-off grade and up to
|
short lengths of high grade results and
|
1m of internal dilution.
|
longer lengths of low grade results, the
|
|
No high-grade cut-off has been used in
|
procedure used for such aggregation
|
this report.
|
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.
|
|
Length-weighted averaging has been used to calculate all intercepts in this report. Length-weighted averaging has
|
|
The assumptions used for any reporting of
|
been used given that sampling intervals
|
metal equivalent values should be clearly
|
were determined geologically and not
|
stated.
|
always nominally.
|
|
No metal equivalents have been used in
|
this report.
|
Relationship These relationships are particularly The reported mineralisation intercepts between important in the reporting of Exploration are downhole widths and not true mineralisation Results. widths, which are unknown at this widths and If the geometry of the mineralisation with time.
intercept respect to the drillhole angle is known, its The geometry of the mineralisation
lengths nature should be reported. whilst historically has been interpreted
If it is not known and only the down hole to dip between 50-70° towards the
lengthsare reported, there should be a east, the current drilling programme has clear statement to this effect (eg 'down shown that a supergene effectmaybe hole length, true width not known'). more pronounced thanoriginally
interpreted and as such the orientation of the mineralisation at the Central deposit is not fully understood.
|
Diagrams
|
|
Appropriate maps and sections (with
|
|
Appropriate
|
maps,
|
photographs
|
and
|
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
|
tabulations are included in the main
|
should be included for any significant
|
body of this report.
|
discovery being reported These should
|
include, but not be limited to a plan view
|
of drill hole collar locations and
|
appropriate sectional views.
|
Balanced
|
|
Where comprehensive reporting of all
|
|
The report provides the total information
|
reporting
|
Exploration Results is not practicable,
|
available to date and is considered to
|
representative reporting of both low and
|
represent a balanced report.
|
high grades and/or widths should be
|
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
|
Exploration Results.
|
Other
|
|
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
|
|
Previous exploration results, including
|
substantive
|
material, should be reported including
|
the JORC Inferred Mineral Resource
|
exploration data
|
(but not limited to): geological
observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples
|
Estimate for Pahtohavare, have been previously reported. No other exploration data is considered material
|
- size and method of treatment;
|
at this stage.
|
metallurgical test results; bulk density,
|