Heading
MEDIA RELEASE
No: TP15/63
Thursday, 19 November 2015 Resource Generation Limited - Declaration of Unacceptable Circumstances,
Orders and Review Application
The Panel has made a declaration of unacceptable circumstances (Annexure A) and final orders (Annexure B) in relation to an application dated 12 October 2015 by Resource Generation Limited in relation to its affairs (see TP15/55).
Background
Resource Generation Limited is a company listed on ASX (ASX code: RES) and JSE (JSE code: RSG).
Resource Generation's substantial holders include Noble Group Limited, through its subsidiary Noble Resources International Pte Ltd, holding 13.69% and Altius Investment Holdings (Pty) Limited, through its subsidiary Shinto Torii Inc., holding 10.69%.
On 28 September 2015, Resource Generation received a letter from Altius containing a notice from Shinto requisitioning a general meeting pursuant to s249D,1 to remove and replace the current four directors on the Resource Generation board with six new directors.
Resource Generation applied to the Panel for a declaration of unacceptable circumstances and submitted, among other things, that certain shareholders, including Noble and Altius, are associates and have failed to disclose their association.
The Panel considered that, since 25 August 2015, Noble and Altius are associated under s12(2)(b) for the purpose of controlling or influencing the composition of the board of Resource Generation or s12(2)(c) in relation to the affairs of Resource Generation, in respect of controlling or influencing the composition of Resource Generation's board.
As a result of the association, the voting power of each of Noble and Altius in Resource Generation's shares aggregates to 24.38%.
1 References are to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) unless otherwise indicated
The Panel considered that the failure of Noble and Altius to disclose their association resulted in RES shareholders being unaware ahead of the requisitioned meeting that Noble and Altius are associates.
The Panel did not consider that it had been provided with sufficient evidence of a voting agreement to make a finding that Noble and Altius had acquired a relevant interest in each other's Resource Generation shares that would result in a contravention of s606.
Declaration
The Panel considered that the circumstances were unacceptable:
-
having regard to the purposes of Chapter 6 set out in section 602 or
-
because they constitute or give rise to a contravention of section 671B.
The Panel did not consider it against the public interest to make the declaration, and in making it had regard to the matters in s657A(3).
Orders
The Panel has made orders that Noble and Altius each provide a notice of change of interest of substantial holder disclosing the existence and nature of their association. It also ordered that they disclose their association in any communication Noble or Altius has with RES shareholders or the media in respect of Shinto's requisitioned meeting.
The sitting Panel was Stephanie Charles, David Friedlander and Nora Scheinkestel (sitting President).
The Panel will publish its reasons for the decision in due course on its website www.takeovers.gov.au.
Review
The Panel has received a review application from Resource Generation seeking a review of the Panel's decision.
A review Panel has not been appointed at this stage and no decision has been made whether to conduct review proceedings. The Panel makes no comment on the merits of the review application.
Allan Bulman
Director, Takeovers Panel Level 10, 63 Exhibition Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Ph: +61 3 9655 3597
[email protected]
ANNEXURE A CORPORATIONS ACT SECTION 657A
DECLARATION OF UNACCEPTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES
RESOURCE GENERATION LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES
-
Resource Generation Limited (RES) is a company listed on ASX (ASX code: RES) and JSE (JSE code: RSG).
-
RES's substantial holders include:
-
Noble Resources International Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of Noble Group Limited (together, Noble) - 13.69% and
-
Shinto Torii Inc. (Shinto), a subsidiary of Altius Investment Holdings (Pty) Limited (together, Altius) - 10.69%.
-
Altius has previously described itself as Noble's South African black empowerment enterprise (or 'BEE') partner. Noble and Altius are 60:40 joint venture partners in Africa Commodities Group.
-
Noble provided the funding for Shinto to buy its RES shares, with a guarantee from Altius regarding the funds.
-
On 10 March 2014, a debt club was established with the aim of funding RES's Boikarabelo coal project in the Waterberg region of South Africa. The process was to be managed by Noble and Altius. The debt club included Noble, Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited (PIC), a holder of 19.49% of RES, and two banks. Debt club negotiations continued for over a year but RES and the debt club were unable to agree on the terms for financing the project.
-
From about July 2015, Noble and Altius began to have discussions regarding the composition of the board of RES.
-
On 25 August 2015, Altius sent an email describing a proposal by Altius '[w]ith the support of Noble…to table resolutions at the next ResGen AGM, due in October, under which each of PIC, Noble and Altius would appoint one non executive director to the board of ResGen' and requesting a meeting with PIC to discuss and secure PIC's support to the proposal. That meeting occurred on 8 September 2015. Altius, with Noble representatives in attendance, delivered a presentation to PIC which described, among other things, Altius' proposal to 'South Africanize the project', the 'voting block' of Noble, Altius and PIC and a 'New South African Board' with PIC to be invited to nominate two directors and Noble and Altius to nominate one director each.
-
On 14 September 2015, RES received an email from Altius requesting board representation for Altius and Noble.
-
On 17 September 2015, Noble wrote to RES requesting the appointment of two additional directors. RES declined to make these appointments referring to the debt club negotiations and stating that the appointment of additional directors by parties with potentially conflicting interests would not be in the interests of the company and its shareholders at that time.
-
Upon receiving RES's response, Noble emailed Altius saying '[a]s expected…I think it is now important to send your letter noting the reason why Noble not appropriate'.
-
On 28 September 2015, RES received a letter from Altius containing a notice from Shinto requisitioning a general meeting pursuant to section 249D2, to remove and replace the current four directors with six new directors.
-
On 9 October 2015, Noble, Altius and PIC met and discussed, among other things, what candidates Altius had in mind for changes to management if Shinto was successful with its section 249D requisition.
-
The Panel considers that since 25 August 2015 Noble and Altius:
-
have a relevant agreement for the purpose of controlling or influencing the composition of the board of RES and are associated with each other under section 12(2)(b) or
-
are acting in concert in relation to the affairs of RES, for the purpose of controlling or influencing the composition of the RES board, and are associated with each other under section 12(2)(c).
-
As a result of the association between Noble and Altius, the voting power of each of Noble and Altius in RES shares has increased to 24.38%.
-
No change in substantial holding notice has been lodged by Noble or Altius disclosing their association. The Panel considers that the failure of each of Noble and Altius to disclose their association in a substantial holding notice constitutes or gives rise to a contravention of section 671B. As a result of the failure to disclose their association, RES shareholders are not aware that Noble and Altius are associates for the purpose of controlling or influencing the composition of the RES board ahead of the requisitioned meeting.
-
It appears to the Panel that the circumstances are unacceptable:
-
having regard to the purposes of Chapter 6 set out in section 602 or
-
because they constitute or give rise to a contravention of section 671B.
-
The Panel considers that it is not against the public interest to make a declaration of unacceptable circumstances. It has had regard to the matters in section 657A(3).
2 References are to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) unless otherwise indicated