|
Yesterday’s
newsworthy satisfactions were marred only by the passage of a spending bill
that unfortunately will allow the U.S. Government to avoid shutting down.
This not-unexpected disappointment aside, all seemed right with the
world: stocks got bitch-slapped for a change, bullion prices screamed,
Charlie Sheen and Col. Qadaffy appeared headed for well-deserved oblivion (even
if there will be no Kadhafy reruns), and winter temperatures here in Boulder,
Colorado, hovered near the mid-60s. What more could one have asked?
Actually, we’d have doubled the Dow’s 178-point decline, since
every significant selloff helps bring America closer to the day when
investors and the world-at-large shed a matrix of lies, delusions and hubris
that have made true economic recovery all but impossible.
Alas, the
spinmeisters and news media, if not the rest of us, continue to cling to the
Bernanke narrative that the economy is returning to health, albeit very slowly. That’s
despite deflation in the real estate sector so severe and prolonged that even
optimists no longer regard it as cyclical; soaring food and energy prices;
and budget crises at all levels of government that will ultimately push
unemployment to heights not seen since the 1930s. Under the circumstances,
you can hardly blame us for betting against every stock-market rally.
We’ve been doing this reflexively for months: getting short at each
minor Hidden Pivot rally target in expectations that one of them will prove
to be The Top – the whimpering end of the Granddaddy of All Short
Squeezes launched almost exactly two years ago.
Locking in Gains
Our strategy has
benefited from consistent (although not necessarily repeatable) success at
predicting tradable tops, even if none has proved particularly enduring. A
week ago, for instance, Rick’s
Picks prepared subscribers to short the QQQ, a popular trading
vehicle, if it hit a “Hidden Pivot” resistance at 57.96. A
tedious grind higher achieved that target four days later, and so we got
short using a very tight stop-loss to theoretically limit our risk.
Specifically, we bought four March 57 puts for a total of $244, and although
we stood ready to dump them if the QQQs had gone even slightly higher,
hitting 58.12, the rally never exceeded 58.05. Since then, we have taken
partial profits so that we have just one put option remaining for every four
originally purchased. Adjusting its costs basis for gains already booked
gives it a carrying cost of negative 0.12, meaning the worst we can do, even
if the QQQs turn savagely higher, is make $12 on the trade before commissions.
At yesterday settlement price of 1.12, we had a theoretical gain of $125 for
each put still held.
The purpose of
such trades is to initiate highly leveraged bets, but also to vent our
permabearish bias without putting much money at risk. In practice, it
has been possible to short this market the entire way up, and to be wrong
each time but still make money. We sometimes refer to this tactic as a
“cheap parlor trick,” since anyone can learn to identify
“hidden” price-reversal points. If you’re interested
in learning how to do it yourself, click here for more information about our proprietary Hidden Pivot Method
for trading and forecasting.
Rick Ackerman
Subscribe to Rick’s Pick
Access to
Rick’s Picks is available via a free seven day trial subscription
by clicking here.
|
|