Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent

German Officials Liken EU Banking Power Proposal to "Nazi Enabling Acts"; What Germany Can Expect; W

IMG Auteur
Publié le 12 juillet 2013
564 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 1 vote, 5/5 ) , 1 commentaire
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
1
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Opinions et Analyses

In June, an EU commission put forth a banking resolution proposal giving itself powers in which the ability to shut down banks would be centralised in the European Commission.

Brussels would have the clout to overrule the bank’s home country and use funds from a central pot.

Specifically, the commission proposed the resolution authority to “be equipped with a single bank resolution fund”. The fund would have the power to borrow from markets, using the “assets of euro area banks” as a guarantee and backstop.

Nazi Enabling Acts

The proposal was presented on Tuesday by Michel Barnier, EU commissioner for internal market and services, and immediately went up in flames when German politicians likened Brussels bank powers to Nazi ‘enabling acts’.

The head of a Bavarian banking association compared the European Commission’s plan to grant itself the final say on winding up troubled banks to the type of law that allowed the Nazis to seize power.

The comments by Stephan Götzl, head of the GVB, the Bavarian association of co-operative banks, underscore the depth of German opposition to the plans presented on Tuesday by Michel Barnier, EU commissioner for internal market and services.

“We in Germany have had a bad experience with enabling acts,” he said, appearing to refer to the 1933 constitutional amendment that handed the Nazis sweeping powers to enact legislation, unchecked by parliament.

The remarks were first reported by the Wall Street Journal and confirmed later by a spokesman. The spokesman noted Mr Götzl had not specifically mentioned Hitler or the Nazis.

“In our view, this proposal gives the commission powers it does not possess according to current [EU] treaties,” chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman said on Tuesday

Wolfgang Schäuble, Ms Merkel’s finance minister, also warned Brussels to respect the limits of the law or “risk major turbulence”.

A spokesperson for Mr Barnier declined to respond to Mr Götzl’s comments.

Mr Barnier is confident the proposed measures are legally sound and cites support from lawyers at the commission, the European council and European Central Bank. Officials say they reluctantly proposed powers for the commission, rather than a separate agency, and did so only because it was the most legally solid and effective institution to handle bank crises under existing EU treaties.

Mr Barnier contends Europe cannot afford to wait for treaty change, which is typically an arduous process that can take years. Brussels wants the resolution regime, commanding some 300 staff, to begin from January 2015.
Reflections on What Germany and the UK Can Expect

The EU will stop at nothing to give itself sweeping powers to do whatever the hell it wants including the creation of monetary transfer mechanisms that are absolutely against the German constitution.

In case this was not obvious before (it should have been), it is certainly obvious now.

Note the excuse by Mr Barnier "Europe cannot afford to wait for treaty change". In other words, to hell with legalities and treaties.

This is such a dangerous, slippery slope that even Merkel and Schäuble commented on it.

What About the UK?

The same applies to the UK in a broader sense (in regards to the EU as opposed to the eurozone).

The only solution is for Germany to say it has had enough of the transfer proposals and to exit the European Monetary Union (EMU). For identical reasons, the UK should exit the EU.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com  
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :5 (1 vote)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
"... cites support from lawyers at the commission ..."

"... and did so only because it was the most legally solid and effective institution to handle bank crises under existing EU treaties."

"Europe cannot afford to wait for treaty change".

1. What did Shakespeare say about lawyers?
2. Effective at bank crisis management? Please cite one example of a success story. Iceland doesn't count because they said, "No thanks" to your help.
3. A genuine snake oil salesman. The reality is Europe can not afford Europe.

I am a bit curious as to just how much additional income each of the EU countries netted out by this grand EU experiment.

Note to Germany: All that balance you have in TARGET2 needs to be settled quickly. Might I suggest a 3 for 1 sale. Sell the balance at 66% off for physical PMs delivered. Why does it take 7 years to return what you entrusted to the US? Ergo, 33 pfennings on the mark is better than nothing. Get my drift there, partner?
Evaluer :   2  0Note :   2
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
"... cites support from lawyers at the commission ..." "... and did so only because it was the most legally solid and effective institution to handle bank crises under existing EU treaties." "Europe cannot afford to wait for treaty change". 1. What di  Lire la suite
overtheedge - 12/07/2013 à 05:36 GMT
Note :  2  0
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.