Reserved for only people who are willing to think for themselves.
As you know, I am the ultimate contrarian. I take nothing at face value especially government announcements and put everything under the microscope of common sense, free market capitalist economics. Instead of beating my own drum, my regular readers already know how right I have been over the years. For those of you who don’t know, you can check my past letters in the archives of gold-eagle.com and 24hgold.com and other websites in the similar vein.
In light of what has recently come to pass, I have decided to extend the 2 for 1 special subscription rate of $249 for two years until February 15th.
RECENT HEADLINES
One of the world's largest money managers, Mohamed El Erian, just up and quit; while three other bankers apparently committed suicide this week. (Just a coincidence?)
One former Deutsche Bank executive, William 'Bill' Broeksmit, was found dead after police received reports of a man found hanging at a London house. (Who’s House?)
Later that day, JP Morgan’s tech executive Gabriel Magee fell to his death from the bank's London headquarters. Those close to him where shocked, citing there was absolutely no indication that there might be anything in his private or professional life that would've cause him to take his life.
A few days after the deaths of the two London finance workers, former Fed member and chief economist at Russell Investments, Mike Dueker, was also found dead after falling from a 50-foot embankment. Pierce County Detective Ed Troyer said the death appeared to be a suicide.
Last week, a UK based communications director at Swiss Re AG - the world's second-largest reinsurer with focus on risk transfer, risk retention financing and asset management died. The cause of death has not been made public.
In a few short days, four finance workers have (apparently) committed suicide, while one of the largest bond fund managers quit the business. Were these events coincidence? Or did these men know something we don't? Were their deaths even suicides? Many are speculating that something serious is brewing in the halls of the global financial markets; that the men who died knew that something extremely bad is about to happen. Others have stated that the bankers who died could've been murdered.
Since we can only speculate (for now), it’s better for us to look at the facts. I don't know what really happened to these men. But I do know that all of these men had one thing in common: They were all responsible for risk management and most logically, all contributed in one way or another to the manipulation of the price of Gold and the exchange value of the US and British currencies.
William 'Bill' Broeksmit
Broeksmit was a seasoned banker who was a pioneer in interest rate swaps and a specialist in capital management and risk.
According to Bloomberg, "Broeksmit had been recruited to Merrill several years earlier by Edson Mitchell, a former head of fixed income who also moved to Deutsche Bank and was a mentor of Jain as well. Broeksmit and Mitchell, in a 1993 memo, warned Merrill management of "potential adverse consequences" for Orange County, California, a client, "in the event of a substantial increase in interest rates and the flight of hot money" from the county's investment pool: The New York Times reported in 1998. Their warning proved late but on the mark. Orange County, the nation's fifth most-populous county, sought protection from creditors in 1994 after losing about $1.7 billion on derivative investments. That was, at the time, the nation's biggest municipal bankruptcy."
Mike Dueker
Dueker worked at Seattle-based Russell for five years and developed a business cycle index that forecast economic performance. He was previously an assistant vice president and research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
According to Businessweek, "He published dozens of research papers over the past two decades, many on monetary policy, according to the St. Louis Fed's website, which ranks him among the top 5% of economists by number of works published (not correct forecasts). His most cited work was a 1997 paper titled "Strengthening the case for the yield curve as a predictor of US recessions," published by the reserve bank while he was a researcher there. How could anything that is fabricated to say what you want it to say BE A PREDICTOR OF ANYTHING ELSE BESIDES WHAT WE ARE WITTNESSING TODAY?
Dueker worked at the reserve bank from 1991 to 2008, starting as an entry level research economist, then advancing to senior economist, research officer and assistant vice president, according to Laura Girresch, a spokeswoman. (He was very good at following the party line.) He helped the bank's president prepare for Federal Open Market Committee policy meetings and wrote and edited for economic publications, she said. Dueker served as editor of the reserve bank's research publication, Monetary Trends and also was an associate editor of the Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,” Girresch said. The county sheriff reported he was having trouble at work.
Trouble with Index Funds
What the articles failed to mention was that at the beginning of the year, a sale of Russell Investments was being explored by its owner, Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance. Russell Management owns and operates the Russell Indexes, which represent the investable global equity market and its segments. It consists of more than 10,000 securities in 63 countries, including Canada and offers hundreds of sub-indexes. The index funds are constructed using float-adjusted market capitalization weights.
Given the growing popularity of index-based funds and exchange-traded funds, firms like Barclays (who may also be exploring the sale of its index funds) and Russell could obtain a good premium for selling their index businesses now. However, what happens if the market crashes? Remember, index funds (including the Russell Index funds) are simply funds that maintain the appropriate weightings to match index performance.
For example, the Russell 3000 is comprised of the top 3000 American stocks by market cap. Every year the index is rebalanced. The managers behind the index have to buy or sell the appropriate amount of shares in each of the 3000 stocks to maintain the correct weighting for its index fund (and if they don’t , who is to know?)
Back in 2008, Russell Investments shut down its hedge fund of funds operation. Its money market funds had more than 5% exposure to securities of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which went under in 2008 - losing hundreds of billions of dollars.
Here's something to think about: if the conspiracy theorists are right and Mike Dueker knew something terrible was going to happen in the market, then his firm, Russell Investments, could be in big trouble. Maybe that's why its owner has been exploring its sale. What would happen to these funds if other banks or stocks collapse, as they did in 2008? Remember the bank runs on Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns? Imagine what would happen if a number of banks all of a sudden failed. Did Dueker or any of the other finance workers who passed away this week, know something? Something to think about.
Worldwide Capital Control
Last Friday, HSBC imposed restrictions on large cash withdrawals under a new policy that apparently was not publicized to its clients. According to the BBC, "Some HSBC customers have been prevented from withdrawing large amounts of cash because they could not provide evidence of why they wanted it.” Listeners have told Radio 4's Money Box they were stopped from withdrawing amounts ranging from £5,000 to £10,000.
HSBC admitted it has not informed customers of the change in policy, which was implemented in November. The bank says it has now changed its guidance to staff.
Meanwhile, according to Bloomberg via Zerohedge, “My Bank' - one of Russia's top 200 lenders by assets - has introduced a complete ban on cash withdrawals until next week.” In other words, if you have money there, you can't take it out. It has now come to light that the Russian Central Bank has now shut down the My Bank. It has also shut down Moscow-based lender, Priroda Bank.
Bloomberg said, the regulator said it also revoked the licenses of two regional non-bank credit organizations, OOO RNKO Traditsiya and OAO NDKO MTSM. My Bank, a top 200 lender by assets, had its license canceled because of "significant misreporting of data and inability to meet creditors' obligations," according to a central bank statement. Priroda Bank was cited for involvement in "suspicious transactions" and not providing sufficient reserves for possible loan losses, the central bank said in separate statement.
The central bank has accelerated its crackdown since November 29 when it revoked the license of Master-Bank, Russia's 41st largest lender by assets, for money-laundering violations. Mid-size lenders, Project Financing Bank and Smolensky Bank were also shut on December 13 and Investbank was closed after failing capital-adequacy reviews.
The central bank has revoked about 35 banking licenses since July 1 when Elvira Nabiullina succeeded Sergey Ignatiev as governor, compared with three in the first half of 2013. Nabiullina is striving to tighten regulation of banks and curtail net capital outflow that was forecast at about $55 billion last year." It's clear that Russia's central bank is going to great lengths to prevent capital flight. It's even punishing citizens who aren't using their currency with threats of jail time.
On Monday, the Russian Central Bank issued a statement warning that virtual currencies or "money surrogates" are illegal under Article 27 of the Federal Law "On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation". This is, of course, directed at Bitcoin users. The Russian bank, like China, outlawed all transactions with Bitcoin (don’t say I didn’t warn you that this would happen). First China, now Russia. Who’s next?
Time to Pay the Piper
Over the past years, I have talked about how the world's extravagant money printing and debt will eventually be passed on to our children and our children's children; likely in the form of taxation. (Maybe? But definitely in the form of INFLATION.) It turns out that Europe is already working on it. Germany's central bank, the Bundesbank, proposed on Monday a one-off wealth tax on their citizens. Naturally, everybody pays except the ones responsible.
Via Financial Times: "The German central bank raised the idea of an emergency capital levy in its monthly report, arguing that it corresponded with the principle of "national responsibility, according to which taxpayers are responsible for their government's obligations, before the solidarity of other states is called upon". (Since when is the public responsible for Government mismanagement of its money?)
The Bundesbank said that the levy would have to be a one-off "imposed in conditions of extraordinary national crisis", in order to limit negative consequences for investment, and potential capital outflows." (Who are they trying to kid?) In other words, Germany wants the citizens of Europe to leave their money in their nations' banks, so that the government can use it to pay off debt. (Guess whose debt gets paid off first?)
All of this comes on the heels of Europe's recent employment slowdown and significant inflation drop, leading to fears of a deflationary spiral. (Is it really deflation that they have to worry about?) And we all know that deflation is the central bank's worst nightmare. (Or is it?) Look for continued low rates in the Eurozone and potentially further stimulus despite the Fed's taper talk.
On Home Turf
China's banks are already having liquidity issues and it's clear that fears of a bank run are beginning to surface again in Europe and Russia. (Sorry I can’t help it but I told you this would happen years ago.)But if you think the fears are happening only overseas, think again. Former Harvard economics professor, Terry Burnham, is about to withdraw $990,000 from his Bank of America account, leaving only $10,000 in it. Why?
Because he doesn't feel his money is safe at the American bank, especially with Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen in charge?
Flight to Safety
Flight to safety is once again becoming the focus around the financial world. It's no wonder why Gold's value has received a bump over the past few weeks. Everyone has a different theory on Gold; some say it's an inflation hedge, while others say it's a currency hedge. The problem with many of these theories is that they never truly (in the short-term) predict the price of Gold. (If you believe that, then by all means leave all your money in the bank.)
Since Gold's price action is based on emotion, the only accurate gauge over the past decade has been fear. (BULL) Here's a look at the "fear index," or the VIX, over the past decade:
The VIX measures the market's expectation of the S&P 500 over the next 30 day period. As you can see, Gold has gone significantly higher over the years as the index spikes. If we use the past decade as a gauge, and expect a stock market correction, Gold should climb much higher. Gold also appears to have leveled and formed a base relative to the VIX, showing that downside is minimal. If Gold climbs, Gold stocks should outperform Gold itself.
The sentiment on both Howe and Bay Street, the financial hubs of Canada, is much better than it was last year. Companies are once again looking to raise money and move their projects forward. While this is always the case, especially with negative cash flow explorers, there is much more noticeable enthusiasm today than there was a year ago. Continue to look for cheap Gold and Silver stocks.
Before I end this week's letter, I want to emphasize that I am not saying the stock market is going to collapse tomorrow. As a matter of fact, there's a still a strong chance that stocks can hang in this year and do quite well. But it would be ignorant to ignore what's happening around the world - especially the actions of governments and central banks. (By all means trust your decision making to history’s BIGGEST CROOKS.)
********
GOOD LUCK AND GOD BLESS
Still worried about the economy? Instead of listening to all the PROPOGANDISTS and Pollyanna trend followers you see and hear on TV and in the Print Media who are always behind the times, subscribe to UNCOMMON COMMON SENSE and stay ahead of the game.
I am extending the two year special subscription rate of only $249 until February 15, 2014.
Most Credit Cards Accepted. Please call (561) 840-9767 to subscribe by credit card or mail a check to:
UNCOMMON COMMON SENSE February 5, 2014
Aubie Baltin CFA, CTA, CFP, PhD.
2078 Bonisle Circle
Palm Beach Gardens FL. 33418
uncommon@aubiebaltin.com
561-840-9767
Don't forget to include your email address as well as your phone number.
This letter/article, like all my others, is for education purposes only and is designed to help you make up your own mind; not for me to make it up for you. Although I include recommendations from time to time, being a bi-monthly publication, it is not meant to be a trading letter. Only you know your own personal circumstances, so only you can decide the best places to invest your money and the degree of risk that you are prepared to take.66
