On April 19, 1775, the battles of Lexington and Concord on the outskirts
of Boston ignited the conflict that led to the most momentous political event
of man's history the Declaration of Independence and the birth of America.
In the early morning hours of that day, a command of British troops was
dispatched from Boston to search out and confiscate stores of militia weapons
and supplies at Concord. On the way they confronted a small and unimposing
band of armed American militia at Lexington. The British Major John Pitcairn
shouted out, "Ye villains, ye Rebels, disperse; damn you, disperse! Lay
down your arms!"
The American militia were under the command of Captain, John Parker; and
their orders were to remain non-antagonistic to the British. They were outnumbered
by almost ten to one. So why didn't they lay down their arms when ordered to
do so? "Because," says constitutional scholar Edwin Vieira,
"free men with a duty to keep and bear arms never willingly lay down
their arms. And at Lexington, none of them did." The heroic militia
Captain John Parker warned his men, "if they mean to have a war let it
begin here." And begin it did.
Importance of the State Militias
With his newest book, The Sword and Sovereignty, Edwin Vieira, Jr., has
given us a magisterial work that meticulously documents the history of the
early American militias and why similar units must be revitalized today if we
are to adequately confront our disintegration as a society and restore the
republic that the Founders gave us. It is a book that will profoundly shock
98 percent of Americans. It is so overpowering in its legal logic and
constitutional veracity that the intellectuality of Cicero and Plutarch comes
to mind as one reads the prose. It is not a book that can be read lightly; it
demands a tolerance for legal thought and abstract conceptualization. But for
those "men of the mind" who understand the importance of ideas in
the unfolding of history, the effort will be most rewarding. You will be
shown an entirely new way of seeing things regarding guns, militia, the
Second Amendment, homeland security, how they intertwine, and how they have
been grossly misrepresented by quisling, pseudo-experts of the establishment.
For the first 125 years of our history, the "Militia of the several
States" was a highly honored institution that played a vital role in
preserving the concept of federalism upon which our system of freedom
depends. This ended with the Militia Act of 1903, which shifted the
"Militia of the several States" into National Guard units under the
auspices of the national military. State and local control was eliminated.
In addition, as Vieira tells us, over the past century decades of disuse,
misuse, and abuse have so thoroughly muddled the meaning of 'Militia' in
contemporary American political discourse that the word is hardly ever
encountered except as invective, usually well-freighted with vituperative
adjectives such as 'extremist' and 'violent', broadcast by the enemies of
constitutional government (and their dupes and other 'useful idiots') for the
purpose of intimidating into silence the people they intend to oppress as
soon as the vast majority of Americans has been thoroughly disarmed through
one form of 'gun control' or another."
Anybody today with a modicum of brains can see that our nation is being
transformed into a "first-class police state." Homeland Security
and Washington's outrageous "Patriot Acts" are Alice in Wonderland
institutions that have taken us a giant step down the path to Orwell's nightmare.
Our military-industrial complex grows exponentially. The Federal Government
has become a Godzilla of ugliness and menace. Our Congressmen are
Machiavellian schemers wallowing in sophistic mazes and treason to truth.
Vieira's answer to this pernicious evolution is startling. As with all big
thinkers in history, he asks us (like Steve Jobs did to his comrades at
Apple) to "Think Different!" He maintains that America cannot be
saved unless she revitalizes her original concept of the "Militia of the
several States." The Sword and Sovereignty explains in 1,945 pages of
text and 305 pages of appendixes, tables, and notes why this must be done
and how to constitutionally do it. Magisterial scholarship is putting it
mildly.
History and Restoration of the Militias
The book explores the legal history of the pre-constitutional Militia
statutes of colonial times to demonstrate that armed and well-regulated
Militias formed on the state level are what the Founders intended for the
provision of "homeland security." The monstrosity of today's
centralized Homeland Security Department in Washington is not needed; a
revival of the "Militia of the several States" and unequivocal
acknowledgement of the people's right to bear arms will give us everything we
require. This will decentralize "security" in the country and help
greatly to check the ominous peril of the military-industrial complex.
Many Americans will perceive this as a quixotic attempt to turn back the
clock and revive a hopeless anachronism that prevailed in the era of
flintlock muskets and tri-cornered caps. Not so. Vieira demonstrates his
points legally with the same overpowering logic that Ludwig von Mises puts
forth economically in Human Action. Mises was relentless in rational
destructions of the socialists' sinister fallacies. So too is Vieira in his
dismantling of the arguments of today's collectivist control freaks.
After he traces the legal history of pre-constitutional Militia and gun
statutes, he then lays out seventeen fundamental principles (in seventeen
chapters) to define how the constitutional structure and service of a
revitalized "Militia of the several States" would be validated.
When one is done reading these seventeen chapters, he sees clearly that a
revitalization of the state Militias is constitutionally legitimate and
workable in the modern day. Whether or not they can be revived is, of course,
an open question. There is huge opposition in all establishment schools,
bureaucracies, and courts to such a radical restructuring of society's power
relationships. But Vieira demonstrates in compelling fashion why and how it
can be done if Americans still have the will.
One of the most profound parts of the book is its explanation in Chapter
One of the present day fallacy of "judicial supremacy," showing how
the Supreme Court is not the ultimate judge of "what the law is."
Congress stands above the Court and may stipulate how the Judges are to
interpret the laws. But most importantly, the People stand above Congress,
for they are the creators of Congress via the Constitution. WE THE PEOPLE
rule in America, not congressional despots and judicial oligarchs.
As the famous eighteenth century jurist, Sir William Blackstone, stated in
Commentaries on the Laws of England, "whenever a question arises between
the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally
delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society
itself: there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to."
Thus the salvation of America must come with reassertion of the citizens'
fundamental right to decide the ultimate issues of their lives. Through
political techniques such as nullification on the part of juries and state
governments the overweening excesses of today's Federal Government and its
bureaucratic thugs can be brought to heel.
It is important to understand that Vieira is NOT proposing
"private" Militias, the likes of which we have seen in recent years
from racial supremacy groups and neo-Nazi extremists. What Vieira is
proposing is the revitalization of governmentally created and legitimized
Militia units among the states that our Constitution calls irrevocably for.
These will be legislated and regulated by the state governments. They will be
official government bodies in all the towns and cities of the land, not rogue
factions that operate from wilderness hideouts. The leftist establishment
media will, no doubt, attempt to portray Vieira's plan as the promotion of
wilderness wackos reveling in burning crosses and white sheets; but hopefully
learned Americans will recognize such smear tactics as the inexcusable
liberal vacuity that it is.
Benefits of Militia Restoration
There are so many benefits to such a revitalization. As Vieira writes,
"Today, at every level of the federal system, America is woefully
unprepared to deal effectively with hurricanes, tornados, floods,
earthquakes, and other natural disasters; with major industrial accidents,
such as leakages from offshore oil-drilling rigs or meltdowns of nuclear
power plants; with epidemics and pandemics; with crop failures and possibly
attendant famines; with invasions through the Volkerwanderung of illegal
immigration; with economic breakdowns, and in particular a collapse of this
country's monetary and banking systems; and with the myriad threats posed by
real terrorism. '[W]ell regulated Militia', however, not only could deal with
the consequences of such events, but also could forefend many of them."
In addition, the Militia can be used to investigate the constitutionality
of the laws that they execute, they can supervise honest elections, they can
help to repel a foreign power invasion, they can help local police, they can
be very instrumental in defeating the machinations of globalism, etc.
Another crucial point to grasp is that the revitalized Militia will not be
in anyway a part of the regular military, nor will they be under the thumb of
Congress. This is the way the Constitution established them in the beginning,
and this is the way they must be revived. They will be institutions of unity
and defense at the state government level. Their revival will begin the vital
process of restoring "federalism."
Owning Guns Not Enough
Vieira explains that the individual right to bear arms as a defense
against tyranny will not suffice in and of itself. "For, confronted by
usurpers and tyrants deploying 'standing armies' and para-militarized police
forces, or by hordes of foreign invaders, armed individuals in isolation or
in small groups would likely prove feckless."
Thus we need the establishment of collective, coordinated state Militias,
which is why the Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep
and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Revitalized Militias will build a protective wall between ourselves and
all tyrants. "Because 'the Militia of the several States' are State
governmental institutions," says Vieira, "no contemporary form of
'gun control' can be applied to them or their members by either Congress or
the States' legislatures. Rather, it is the duty of Congress and the States'
legislatures to see that all members of the Militia are properly armed, not
to any degree disarmed." Thus the gun controllers will be stopped dead
in their tracks.
The pre-constitutional colonial and state statutes during the 150 years
leading up to 1787, demonstrate irrefutably that Militias organized on the
state and local levels were held by the patriots of the era to be vital for
the defense of freedom and order in the republic. The modern day is no different;
in fact, such institutions are even more vital. Upon this right of individual
and local self-defense, there can be no compromise.
Most libertarians and conservatives are aware of the recent testimony in
front of Congress by Suzanna Hupp regarding our right to bear arms. She was
one of the victims of the tragic Luby's massacre in Killeen, Texas in 1991
and lost both her parents to the gun-toting madman. She testified to our
Washington solons that if she had been allowed to carry the gun she owned in
her purse, she would have been able to kill the madman and would have saved
numerous lives including her parents.
Then she topped off her heroic testimony with these searing words as she
stared Senator Charles Schumer and his imperious cronies right in the eyes:
"I am sitting here getting more and more fed up with all of this talk
about these pieces of machinery having no legitimate sporting purpose, no
legitimate hunting purpose. People, that is not the point of the Second
Amendment. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting
.It is about our
rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from all of you
guys up there."
How to Bring About the Revitalization
The Militias of early America in both pre and post Constitution eras were
basically compulsory institutions. The states mandated that all able-bodied
men were subject to membership and duty. In other words the states had the
right to impress citizens into the Militia. This, of course, will not be
acceptable to the libertarian community of the modern day. So if the Militias
are to be revived, they will have to be voluntarily joined as Independent
Militia Companies formed by the state governments. And this is the procedure
that Vieira advocates. Independent Militia Companies must spring up under the
auspices of the state governments via volunteers.
Vieira goes into detail, however, explaining how the early American
viewpoint was that membership in the Militias had to be compulsory, and that
eventually they should be formed into such units as Americans are educated in
this upcoming century toward their duties as well as their rights in
maintaining a free republic. He makes a very passionate case for regaining
the "all for one and one for all" spirit that animated early
Americans' willingness to tolerate compulsory membership in their local
Militias. Being a political libertarian, I would disagree on this point and
rely permanently on voluntary units as the undergirding structure to
revitalization. The Militias might not work as efficiently, and their
memberships might not be spread as evenly among all citizens, but they will
be a lot safer units of government under volunteer recruitment policies.
The Founders understood the power lusting nature of man and the necessity
for citizens to be armed and organized at all times as protection from their
rulers. Suzanna Hupp understands this. Edwin Vieira understands it. And now
we as a people must come to realize it. Our right to bear arms has nothing to
do with duck hunting. State Militias have nothing to do with wilderness
wackos.
"The struggle that has been thrust upon Americans," writes
Vieira, "is not one to preserve the uniquely American way of life, but
to restore it." The plague of factions and collectivist usurpers has
decimated the republic. "Today, the true America exists only as
fleeting, dissipating shadows of her former self."
The Sword and Sovereigntys message will go a long way toward restoring
that resplendent America we lost. It is a profoundly patriotic work of
powerful impact that can direct our intelligentsia toward a rediscovery of
our real roots. Any thinking man or woman today who fears for Americas
survival needs to tackle this book. It is available in CD format at Amazon.