Our Federal Reserve is composed of labor market economists who place their
faith in the theory that inflation is spawned from too many people working.
They believe there is a trade-off between employment and prices, where price
stability and full employment cannot exist peacefully together the same time.
Given this view, the Fed's maximum employment and stable inflation mandates
are played as a zero-sum game--the lower the unemployment rate the higher the
rate of inflation. Therefore, they set about to fulfill this task of low inflation
as though it were a sort of Ancient Mayan sacrificial system: ceremonially
counting how many job seekers need to be sacrificed on the altar of labor slack
to placate the inflation gods.
And so began the FOMC's countdown to the inflation blastoff since the end
of the great recession. Our economy started with an unemployment rate as high
as 10% in 2009 and negative Consumer Price Inflation (CPI). The Fed first warned
us that an inexorable rise of inflation would start once the unemployment rate
fell below 6.5%. However, the unemployment rate has dropped to 4.9% and the
Fed is left starring at the heavens wondering why its 2% inflation target has
yet to be reached.
Now, from some truth about inflation. Inflation occurs when the market loses
faith in the purchasing power of a currency, not from too many individuals
becoming productive. In reality, there is no evidence that full employment
is inflationary. In fact, the 1970's stagflation struggles proved that unemployment
and inflation could rise rapidly in tandem. And during the sub 4% unemployment
rate during the turn of the century proved that an unprecedented amount of
productive people could exist in a world of below 3% CPI.
Despite overwhelming data to the contrary, the 255,000 increase in July jobs
created is putting pressure on the FOMC to finally raise rates for the first
time this year. But even a cursory look at the relationship between high CPI
and a low unemployment rate since 1971 shows that none exists.
Consumer Price Inflation CPI:
The Unemployment rate:
But Yellen and company need look no further than Japan to see there is no
correlation. Throughout the nation's multiple lost decades marked by disinflation,
Japan has always had an extremely low unemployment rate; averaging 2.73% since
1953, and hitting a high of just 5.6% in July of 2009.
In June of this year, Japan's jobless rate dipped to a twenty-year low of
3.1 percent. The number of employed increased by 720,000 year on year, to 64.97
million for the 19th straight rise. The number of unemployed dropped 140,000
on year to 2.1 million, for the 73rd consecutive fall.
If Fed dogma were correct, these newly employed spenders would at the very
give the Japanese inflation rate the jolt it needed to reach its long awaited
2% target. But Consumer prices in Japan dropped by 0.4 percent year-on-year
in June of 2016, the 4th straight month of declines. And core consumer prices
fell 0.5 percent from a year earlier in June, the steepest drop since March
2013. Household spending fell 2.2 percent in June from a year earlier, while
industrial output slipped 1.9 percent on an annual basis.
If full employment is the progenitor of inflation, why isn't Japan breaking
into hyperinflation?
The truth is any inflation evident in today's economy is not coming from a
low unemployment rate, it originates from the record size of central bank balance
sheets and the staggering increase in government debt that is being monetized.
And that inflation is disproportionately being funneled into the bond and stock
market, driving bond yields into negative territory and stock prices to all-time
highs. In fact, the size of global central bank balance sheets has now risen
to an astonishing 17.2 trillion dollars.
But the Fed still feels compelled to worship its labor market dashboard; believing
the inflation gods will be angered by the low unemployment rate. Therefore,
the chances are increasing by the day that the yield curve will invert. This
is because while Ms. Yellen is slowly and painfully hiking short-term rates
(albeit for the wrong reason) the long end is being suppressed by the nearly
$200 billion per month of QE from the developed world's central bankers.
Flattening of the yield curve:
Why is an inverted yield curve so important? An inverted yield curve cuts
off bank lending and has precipitated the last 7 recessions 100% of the time.
Only this go around, the yield curve will invert somewhere in the one percent
area instead of the mid-single digits—so there isn't much room at all for the
Fed to widen spreads. Unfortunately, this is just one of the landmines placed
by global central bankers that will explode with unprecedented ramifications.
The other time bomb set to blow is runaway inflation coming from the collapse
of faith in central bankers to retreat from the pace of fiat currency creation.
And this will occur regardless of how many people the Fed has deemed worthy
of earning a living.
