It seems like
only yesterday. Ok, it seems like sixteen months ago. Are we really going to
do this again?
Less than a
year and a half after the markets were pummeled by Washington politicians
playing chicken they are at it again. So far the markets are taking the
situation better but that seems to be mainly because no one really thought
the political class would be that stupid. As usual, it seems to be a mistake
to overestimate the common sense of politicians of any stripe.
As this is
written there are only a few days for the inside the Beltway crowd to avoid
the so called Fiscal Cliff. After an election that largely reinforced the
status quo it looked like some sort of deal would get done. In the past two
weeks those hopes were dashed and the positions of both the Democrats and
Republicans in Washington are hardening.
That's not to
say a deal is impossible even now. Indeed there is a wide range of spending
cut and tax increase/loophole closing combinations that you could get a
bipartisan majority to vote for, even if most were holding their nose when
they did it. What there isn't by the look of things is a combination at will
not tick off a large chunk of one, and probably both, caucuses.
That means
that the leaders of those two caucuses, Obama and Boehner, are going to have
to have enough guts to take the flack from their
own members. That was always going to be the case. It remains to be seen if
either or both of those leaders are willing to be leaders in a situation like
this.
In the
greater scheme of things the scale of cuts and revenue increases being
discussed is not huge. We're reminded of the situation in Canada in the
1980's which was much more dire at a fiscal level.
In that case conservative politicians enacted a hugely unpopular tax and the
liberals that followed them enacted equally unloved
spending cuts. The job got done but it took some political bravery on both
sides of the House for it to get done. We see little evidence of that in the
US. Democrats are trying to ignore an entitlement structure everyone can see
is a time bomb. Republicans are shackled by a ridiculous "pledge"
that keeps them from being rational about the need to restructure revenue
streams.
{For the
record, your editor is no more in love with the idea of new taxes than anyone
else. Nonetheless, the idea of pledging to never ever raise taxes under any
circumstances like some sort of blood oath is ridiculous. Politicians get
elected to lead and putting oneself in that inflexible a position based on an
oath to an unelected group is not leadership.
Few members
of the Conservative government that enacted the GST in Canada loved the idea.
They thought the public would hate it and they were right. The party was
taken to the woodshed and didn't see a meaningful representation in
parliament for almost twenty years. It had to be done however in order to
preserve the services the majority of the nation said they wanted. The PM
that led the country at the time had his issues but its always seemed to me he should have gotten more
credit for the guts that decision surely required. I see very little sign of
that sort of nerve in the leadership of either party in Washington.}
So now we are
down to the wire, again. If there is no deal by the end of the year the
markets are going to react badly. We don't think it would actually be as bad
as August 2011. As nasty as the tax rate increases and spending cuts would be
without a deal the effects of debt default are much worse. The markets'
reaction to the near miss on the debt ceiling deal was appropriate to the
seriousness of a debtor country nearly defaulting.
If there was
no deal, period, then it's all but certain the US would see a recession early
in 2013. That seems much less likely than the idea of no deal by January 1st.
Frankly, if
we were Democratic strategists (we're decidedly not) we would recommend
"going over the cliff". Spending cuts would be forced, the Bush tax
cuts would disappear then all parties could come back to the table. Obama
could get the tax increases on higher income he wants and present the deal as
a new "Obama tax cut" for 95%+ of the population. Egad!
Poll after
poll has made it clear which party will get most of the blame if a deal
doesn't happen this month. It boggles the mind that even Tea Party
enthusiasts want to set themselves up to be gamed this way. I guess we'll
find out who's really bluffing in the next week. While Washington was busy
with political farce, China made a much smoother transition from one
administration to another.
China has no
shortage of issues but here at least there seems to be some pickup in
economic growth. That will help the rest of the world economy but China isn't
in a position to be the sole driver as it was in early 2009.
Word is that
Beijing is targeting a 7.5% growth rate for 2013 and plans to raise rural
incomes and push for another urbanization drive at the same time. Sinophobes are predicting disaster but they have been
wrong for years and we see no reason to think they won't be again.
We noted in
the past couple of issues that the US consumer was more upbeat than anyone
expected. This is largely thanks to an improving housing market and four
years of personal debt deleveraging. This could change quickly if politicians
don' get their act together.
The latest
consumer confidence survey released on December 21st showed a large month
over month drop in confidence, knocking the measure back to where it was in
the spring. It takes no imagination to guess what the cause of this turn was.
Partisan stupidity is weighing on the psyche of US spenders again.
The two
charts above may be telling and we'll go into them and more in the next
issue. Europe hasn't done much lately but the Euro has managed to climb four
cents since the US election. Gold hasn't followed the latest Euro up leg as
it normally would. Some of that is technical selling after traders didn't get
the bounce they hoped for after the last Fed meeting. There was "sell on news" in the gold market since various Fed
governors all but pre-announced the move from Operation Twist to more bond
buying.
Some of gold
losses may be also tax gain selling. It's easy to forget sometimes that gold
is one of the most successful assets in the past decade. If one feared an
increase in capitals gains rates it would be an obvious choice to take
profits on. It's too early to know if that is part of the cause for gold's
recent dip. If it is however, gold could get its own bounce soon. Stay Tuned.
Eric Coffin
To download our latest HRA Journal for free--which includes a recent new recommendation that is making gains--click here now!
The HRA – Journal, HRA-Dispatch and HRA-
Special Delivery are independent publications produced and distributed by Stockwork Consulting Ltd, which is committed to providing
timely and factual analysis of junior mining, resource, and other venture
capital companies. Companies are chosen on the basis of a speculative
potential for significant upside gains resulting from asset-based expansion.
These are generally high-risk securities, and opinions contained herein are
time and market sensitive. No statement or expression of opinion, or any
other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer, solicitation or
recommendation to buy or sell any securities mentioned. While we believe all
sources of information to be factual and reliable we in
no way represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor of the statements
made herein. We do not receive or request compensation in any form in order
to feature companies in these publications. We may, or may not, own
securities and/or options to acquire securities of the companies mentioned
herein. This document is protected by the copyright laws of Canada
and the U.S.
and may not be reproduced in any form for other than for personal use without
the prior written consent of the publisher. This document may be quoted, in
context, provided proper credit is given.
©2010 Stockwork Consulting Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Published by Stockwork Consulting Ltd.
Box 85909, Phoenix AZ , 85071
Toll Free 1-877-528-3958
hra@publishers-mgmt.com http://www.hraadvisory.com
|