Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent

The Economist and Gold

IMG Auteur
Publié le 31 mai 2011
719 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 0 vote, 0/5 )
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
[titre article pour referencement]
0
envoyer
0
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
SUIVRE : Dollar Euro Trillion
Rubrique : Or et Argent

Gold, scarcity and the "industrially useless" fallacy...

In THE ECONOMIST last week Nils Sandberg from Cambridge University's Judge Business School presented a common argument against gold's current value, which according to him is in bubble territory because gold has few industrial uses.

Disproving his thesis is childishly simple, writes Paul Tustain, founder & CEO of BullionVault.

Take one twenty pound note out of your wallet. Consider the industrial applications of the paper it is printed on. Now burn it.

Well, why didn't you? After all, its value – according to Mr Sandberg's thesis – rests on the paper's usefulness in industrial processes.

Nevertheless it's still interesting to understand why gold – like twenty pound notes – is valued above its manufacturing relevance. Unsurprisingly the answer lies in marginal utility.

Gold offers humanity one exceptionally useful property; it has an extraordinarily stable stock. There are 166,000 tonnes of the stuff above ground (worth about 8 trillion dollars) of which about 88% is held as a value store of sorts, in jewellery (52%) and bullion (36%). The stock is growing by about 1.5% a year, from the combined efforts of all the world's miners.

It is because gold is each of:

  1. geologically rare;
  2. elemental (i.e. incapable of being manufactured); and
  3. industrially useless,

that it has this reliable stock quantity. Nothing else can do it; not silver, which is 80 times more common in the ground, nor platinum, which is far too useful as a catalyst to offer stock stability.

Reliable scarcity is the key property savers require of money, which otherwise fails to store value. But of course we don't need gold to deliver reliable scarcity, we can usually create that reliable scarcity artificially, as we do with our modern currencies.

Now the marginal utility explanation. When new currency is too freely issued reliable scarcity becomes under-supplied, and savers go in search of it. Having seen artificial reliable scarcity fail in one currency, the promise of it in another is unconvincing, so they turn to natural reliable scarcity, and demand for it increases dramatically as governments print money. This is what drives gold up. Mr Sandberg is right though, that it will eventually go down again, when currencies' artificial scarcity once more becomes reliable, and when those currencies start to generate a yield.

But in the meantime it looks irrationally optimistic to hope that the US government faced with a 21 trillion dollar debt will not print more and more money.

The question, therefore, is whether the savers who own 100 trillion dollars of dated debt instruments in the bond markets will take fright at continuing money printing policies of the US and other governments. That 100 trillion of dated debt has already started running down the clock. It is shifting to the short end, where it behaves more and more like cash. Maybe its holders will demand cash (as is their right) at its redemption. The sums involved would swamp the 15 trillion dollars of cash and near term deposit instruments currently in issue.

People who own gold are increasingly aware of this possibility. We don't know whether the Dollar, the Euro, the Yen and the Pound (all of which have started a debt market drift to the short end) will ultimately go into the currency death spiral. We are just mindful that it is the usual destiny of currencies driven by political expedience toward the printing press. It looks like a possibility at least.

To finish with here's the brainteaser which the Chinese are currently wrestling with. Now that you know the US debt profile is slowly shifting to the short end, and represents about 6 times the currency in issue, you are required to choose today something to own in 8 years time. What would you rather have, a tenth of the US Treasury's paper bond debts, or five times its very large gold reserve? At current market prices these two are worth about the same.

By the way, in the intervening 8 years the US government has budgeted to issue 8 trillion net of its own bonds, representing an increase in the stock of 57%. A further 1 trillion of gold will be mined worldwide, an increase in the stock of 12%.

Buying Gold today...? Make it simple, secure and ultra-cost effective at world No.1 online, BullionVault...

 

<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :0 (0 vote)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
Soyez le premier à donner votre avis
Ajouter votre commentaire
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.