Anytime one discusses the price of Bitcoin they are wise
to keep in mind the Cohen-Seidenburg theorems because
of the wildly fluctuating nature of humans since it seems everyone loves to chase the rabbit. And just
because you chase the rabbit doesn’t mean you will get it!
PAST CALLS ON VALUATION
Four days ago I received an email from a reader and
friend that asked:
Considering where we are now in price,
where do you think might be a good entry point for a significant purchase?
My response? “We are already well into the next bull
market. Read my article from 2012 to understand why.”
On 31 Dec 2012 when most people did not even know what a Bitcoin was,
including my friend who recently emailed me, and the price was around $13.20
I wrote the article During 2012 Fiat Currencies and Gold Collapse Against Bitcoin.
There really are a lot of gems in the article for anyone who is
seriously looking at Bitcoin.
DEMAND FOR BITCOIN
Thus, the $100B question is: Are people willing to spend money to
hire Bitcoin?
The interesting thing about science and real economics instead of
political dogma is that the principles apply across time.
In that article I thoroughly discussed how the price of Bitcoin is
determined. Since the supply is known the exchange rate of Bitcoins is
composed of (1) transactional demand and (2)
speculative demand. I even had a fancy little graph with a
quote to really get the attention of readers for this section:
The above chart shows the total transaction fees Bitcoin miners received
on a daily basis and is normalized to a 200 day moving average to filter out
the daily noise. As the chart plainly reveals Bitcoin is rapidly being
adopted and used on a daily basis.
Bitcoin users incur about US$400 of daily transaction fees to send
approximately 50,000 daily Bitcoin transactions with optionally
included fees. And that is just transactions where people are
actually sending Bitcoins and want priority processing. From my own
experience I pay for priority processing in less than 10% of transactions and
I do not engage in many Bitcoin transactions because Bitcoin is used merely
as a settlement currency and is not yet widely adopted by all
the merchants who I purchase goods and services from.
WHERE BITCOIN IS TODAY
When I started publicly talking about and recommending Bitcoin it was
around $0.25. Then it had a major run in mid-2011 to $32.00 and crashed to
around $2. Some of us took that opportunity to get some USD liquidity and
make venture investments to build the ecosystem.
In my case I wanted to build out infrastructure for the first
order network effect of speculation and second order network effect
of merchant adoption. Thus, the projects I funded included Armory (most
secure and private wallet) and Bitpay (largest
merchant processor).
During 2012 there was about $2m of venture capital investment for the
entire ecosystem. That is not entirely accurate since some of us made
substantial investments that were not reported publicly.
Since then there were publicly reported investments of $95m in 2013, $362m
in 2014 and $482m in 2015 for about $1B total. For example, Bitpay has raised
an additional $30m and competitors like Coinbase or Circle have raise over
$100m. There is a real and legitimate ecosystem and industry forming around
the core Bitcoin protocol.
And all of these companies are building software to satisfy use cases and
add value. All of this activity entrenches the fifth order network
effect of developer involvement. There are now a ton of ways for individuals
to use Bitcoin. Thus, the $100B question is: Are people willing to
spend money to hire Bitcoin?
CURRENT TRANSACTION FEES
So, how much are people paying to hire Bitcoin and how does that compare
to the past?
Transaction fees are the barometer for how much value the Bitcoin network
adds to society because it shows how much people are willing to pay to use
it.
OPINIONS VERSUS MONEY
Everyone has opinions. Not everyone has money. What opinions matter? What
opinions do people really care about? The ones money gets staked on. The more
money at stake the more important the opinion.
Think the scaling Bitcoin discussion could pose a threat to
Bitcoin’s price? Then sell your bitcoins (if you have any); it is that
simple. Or, even better, if you are able then short Bitcoin. Some people like
bear roadkill. After all, the market will determine who was correct.
If block size, block interval or any myriad of other reasons were the
driving cause for people hiring Bitcoin (buying and holding; not spending
which is actually firing) then we would see a lot more activity in the price
of Litecoin, Dogecoin, Ether, XRP, etc. But we do not see that price activity
and Bitcoin’s market capitalization is about $5.9B of $6.47B or 92% share.
The market is speaking.
This is why the experiments need to happen in those projects playing
second fiddle on the junior varsity team instead of in the real professional
project. Plus, in the extremely unlikely event that any of those playing
second fiddle [why are they playing second fiddle in the first place?] are
able to develop a significant innovation then Bitcoin, where the professionals with the brainpower are, will most likely
be able to incorporate the change(s) and foreclose the ability to
supplant the other network effects to such a degree that it poses any
material risk to Bitcoin. Thus, it is better to do it right than do it first.
CONCLUSION
That big giant increase in the curve during 2012? Now it is a hardly
noticeable bump and a lot of Bitcoin’s competitors are in the dustbin of
history. Plus, that is what the big giant increase in the curve during
2014 is going to look like in a few years. Why? Because network effects.
The bear market of the past two years has been brutal, hard, necessary and
good. But now it is time to strap in!
No
tips yet.
Be the first to tip!
Support Run To Gold - Tip With Bitcoin
1DJCYbU7sVT42N6tyiBWkZ9Uj3Y5PJowE1
Find this post helpful? Please consider tipping with Bitcoin. Each article
gets a unique Bitcoin address so by tipping you help make Run To Gold
sustainable and give valuable feedback on which content is most appreciated!
Tweet
24 random numbers