|
Several years ago, the
police entered the office of a young professor at a reputable university and
arrested him for an online crime. They took the professor away, booked him,
and then offered him a deal: admit guilt and get off easy. The professor said
to the few people to whom he was permitted to speak that this was crazy
because he was innocent. His lawyer warned him: fight this and you could get
life; admit guilt and you will get a suspended sentence. He took the deal. It
was a trick. Now he languishes in jail, his life wrecked as far into the
future as he can see.
This doesn't happen in
America, does it? Yes, it does. Not only that, it is increasingly the norm.
Those raised on a steady diet of courtroom television shows believe that they
are true to the way justice is meted out. This is completely naive. Trials in
federal criminal cases are rare. Nine in ten cases are settled in pleas like
the above case. Only 3 percent of the cases go to trial. Among those that go
to trial, the defendant wins once in every 212 times.
What this means is that
there is no way out for the accused. The prosecutors have all the power. Not
even the judge has discretion because lawmakers have mostly taken that
liberality away in the name of cracking down on crime. This happened all
through the 1980s and 1990s, and the prosecutorial dictatorship has
entrenched itself to become the norm since 2001. For the last ten years, the
police state has had free rein.
It was not
"liberals" or "conservatives" who did this. It was both
parties acting with massive support of the American public, as tyrants in the
public sector licked their chops. This was a result of security-minded
madness, and even now hardly anyone cares.
Today, every single
citizen, no matter how free he or she may feel in daily life, is in reality a
sitting duck. You can be made to disappear. There is essentially no way you
can escape once the feds sweep you into their net. There is no justice. The
total states of the past used to pretend to have trial-based convictions. The
total state of the present doesn't even bother. It just puts a sack over your
head and takes you away.
What happens then? Your
loved ones cry. They try to move close by to where you are holed up,
typically several states away. They are bankrupted and ruined. And what of
your coworkers, your friends, your social set? They might want to help. They
might feel bad for you. But the fact is that you pleaded guilty, and you have
not even a chance to tell your side of the story. For all anyone knows, you
got exactly what you deserved. So they do the only thing they can do: they
forget about you.
And there you languish
until the system decides you are taking up too much room. Perhaps it is ten
years. Maybe twenty. At some point, the doors open again and you are free.
But you are ruined: bitter, talentless, emotionally changed, physically
debilitated, and - if you are young and slim - gang raped. There is no point
in contacting the friends that abandoned you. Members of your family have
moved on; they have lives, too, and had to live them out. In terms of
employment, you are a washed up ex-con.
The US has the largest
prison population in the world - 2.3 million people. That's more than 1 in
100 people. That's more than the population of Latvia or Slovenia. That's
nearly the entire population of Nevada. That's Wyoming, DC, North Dakota, and
Vermont combined. If the prison population had Congressional representatives,
they would have four seats.
These people are politically,
socially, culturally, and economically invisible. How many are actually
guilty? We can't know. How many could be let out today to make a wonderful
contribution to building a productive society? We don't know. How many are completely
nonviolent, not even guilty by any normal standard of law but only guilty
according to the letter of the current dictatorship? Probably a majority.
Perhaps a large majority. In the New Testament, visiting prisoners is
equated, as a good deed, to visiting the sick. And we do not think of the
sick as guilty.
Yet the rise and
entrenchment of the American police state are rarely questioned. Public
opinion is mostly happy with the whole thing. There can never be too much
prosecutorial power, never too many police, never too many prisons, never
sentences that are too long. No one says: "We should not be so
tough." The entire ethos is the opposite. A rare story such as the one
in the NYT recently is too little to wake anyone up.
How could this have
happened in America? Well, looking back, it seems that it all stems from a
single flaw: the belief that the most essential institution in society is the
state that protects us from criminality and must maintain a monopoly over
justice. Some of the greatest defenders of freedom otherwise have been happy
to make this one concession to the state. And this one concession is now a
major source of our undoing as a free people.
There are reforms that we
can make. No more plea bargains in federal cases. Restore basic human rights.
Give judges and juries back their discretion to evaluate each case, and
permit them to rule on the merit of the law, too, in the common-law
tradition. A push back to grant basic Constitutional protections would be a
good first step.
However, in the end, what
is really needed is a fundamental rethinking of the notion that the state
rather than private markets must monopolize the provision of justice and
security. This is the fatal conceit. No power granted to the state goes
un-abused. This power, among all possible powers, might be the most important
one to take away from the state.
|
