The disappearance of knowledge from
human consciousness is a rare phenomenon, but there are recorded instances of
knowledge which has evaporated. As a curious example, Pancirollus,
writing in the 16th Century mentions that, among many other cases of lost
technology, in the time of the Roman Empire a man who had invented flexible
glass was presented to Emperor Tiberius. Tiberius condemned the poor man
to death and ordered the destruction of all his products, considering that
such an invention was detrimental to society.
A striking case of general human amnesia
is that of Aristarchus of Samos (born 310 B.C.) who was the first man to
declare that the Sun is the center of the solar system, and that the Earth
and all the other planets revolve around the Sun; he also arranged the Earth
and planets in the correct order of their distance from the Sun. This
knowledge was fairly soon forgotten and only rediscovered by Copernicus -
1800 years later!
Whether the Sun is the center of the
solar system or whether it revolves around the Earth, as was thought to be
the case up to the time of Copernicus, is really of little consequence to
human life, which goes on normally whatever we wish to think about the
Universe. We happen to know someone who still adheres to Holy Writ and who is
firmly convinced that the Sun revolves around the Earth, and he has sent us a
book which attempts to prove that Scripture is correct. Well, who cares? We
still have to eat three meals a day, whatever we wish to think about the
Universe.
We mention all this because we are back
to Tiberius, who decided that a new invention was noxious to human life and
deliberately suppressed all knowledge about it: it appears that humanity is
today subjected to the suppression of knowledge which is - unlike cosmology
or the technique for the manufacture of flexible glass – vitally
important to human life; we refer to knowledge about money and Austrian
economics.
The control of knowledge is not a new
thing; from the dawn of history, priesthoods of all religions – the
Élite of ancient times - have done their best to control knowledge
through the creation of mysteries and the invention of rites of initiation
into the various degrees of knowledge. Pythagoras, in the 6th Century B.C.
prohibited his disciples from writing down anything related to his teachings,
which is why we know so little about them. The Egyptian priesthoods were also
hermetic – the very word denotes the sacredness of the knowledge
retained by the priesthood. The Celtic Druids controlled their acquired
knowledge with extreme jealousy and required its memorization: knowledge was
not to be written down. The accumulated wisdom of the Celts vanished when all
the Druids were killed by the Romans. In our day, Freemasonry operates under
a strict system of degrees of access to knowledge open only to initiates who
fulfill the required qualifications.
It is suspicious that all knowledge
relating to real money and Austrian economics is carefully excluded, all over
the world, from consideration in Academia, from the deliberations of
Legislative bodies, from the pages of journals, from the TV screen and from
the productions of the film industry. It appears that humanity is being
subjected to a planned operation to erase from all human consciousness the
memory of real money and of the economic principles that lead to prosperity.
Of course the Élite know full well that “gold is money, all
else is credit”: J. P. Morgan himself said so.
Who are the
world’s Élite? They are an amorphous number of individuals from
around the world. They are the people who have influence and the power to
affect the operations of leading institutions. They are the people who are
invited to Bilderberg meetings, to World Economic Forum
meetings in Davos, Switzerland. They are the people of the Trilateral
Commission, the members of the CFR. They compose the Brotherhood
of Central Bankers around the world. They head the great world-spanning
corporations. Typically, the Élite are the world’s top bankers
and politicians. What they have in common is the desire to perpetuate their
wealth, influence and power, which means that they quite naturally agree
(without even having to acknowledge their agreement) to bar any discussion of
questions of the greatest transcendence, because the greater the transcendence,
the greater the number of the Élite who would be adversely affected by
any change. It would be quite improper, for instance, to bring up the subject
of a return to the Gold Standard at any meeting of the Élite. This
explains why no journalist under the influence of the Élite,
publishing his articles in The Wall Street Journal or in the Financial
Times, may include in his analysis of the present financial breakdown of
the world any mention of the central cause of that breakdown: fiat money.
The only money that is considered in the
Media, accredited institutions of learning and all other institutions of any
weight across the world is fiat money – imaginary money. Fiat money is
to be considered as the only possible money and the best of all possible moneys:
gold and silver are trashed as antiquated and failed currencies. In some
circles, the idea that money should be gold or silver, or both, is regarded
as ridiculous if not scandalous.
The other side of the control over
access to Knowledge exercised by the Élite through the centuries is
the deliberate spreading of falsehoods, fictions, fairy-tales or memes
which serve to consolidate the rule of the Élite. Examples too
numerous to mention abound: 9-11 is but one example.
Humanity could forget everything that has
been learned about the Universe and be none the worse for it, but forgetting
about what money is and must be is of vital importance to humans, because
true money is the life-blood of any human society living under the division
of labor.
Since 1971, all money all over the world
is nothing but numeric money; money which consists of numbers and which has
no substance. The contrast with our culture is striking: we are supposed to
be living in an Age of Materialism, and yet the world’s money has no
material existence – it is purely symbolic or imaginary. Paper money,
previously a derivative of underlying metal, no longer derives value
from any underlying referent. Digital money is an even more vacuous
complement of paper money.
The Élite has created for itself the
power to run the world; how is this power to be retained? How is the
Élite to run the world in such a way that it remains in power? Take
into account that there are now over 7 billion humans vying for all the
things that are required to maintain human life, plus iPads,
cellphones and other stuff.
First of all, as a member of the
Élite one must understand that it is impossible to reason with 7
billion humans: in fact, it’s almost impossible to reason with anyone
who is dissatisfied with his economic situation, let alone 7 billion.
This is why Bismarck, the Iron
Chancellor of Germany, invented the Welfare State back around 1890. He had a
number of unhappy Germans listening to Socialist agitation, and to distract
them he promised them State aid in case of unemployment, medical assistance
in case of illness or injury, and a pension upon retirement. In effect, he
stole the thunder from the Socialist agitators who were stirring up
resentment. Bismarck invented “Socialism lite”.
The Élite around the world since
Bismarck’s time have agreed to implement Democracy and have implemented
and expanded his Welfare State. A lovely dream for the masses! They get to
vote and the majority rules – hard to complain about that. Elections
pose no problem for the Élite: when have votes ever changed anything
of transcendence? And then, the masses have the Welfare State to be their
nanny and take care of all their problems.
Perhaps some government, applying
Prussian discipline, might in theory be able to pay for “Socialism
lite” out of tax receipts without running deficits, but in practice not
a single government in the world has in fact been able to do so; Welfare
Benefits have overthrown all fiscal balance in the nations of the world.
There has been only one way to fund the Welfare State, and that way has
required another lie: fiat money. This is the inexhaustible well from which
funds are pulled up to pay for the Welfare State. Real money would never do;
its supply would soon be exhausted; the drain of silver and gold would crush productive
activity, supposing such volume of taxation could be collected at all in real
money.
One must understand that it is no small
thing to retain control over billions of humans. It takes lies, but from the
point of view of the Élite, the lies are useful and indeed,
indispensable.
Will the fiat money well never run dry?
Not really; for if the numbers required to fund the Welfare State become too
large and unwieldy, the thing to do is lop off some zeros from the money in
use and from prices, and the game goes on. Argentina has shown the way: since
the 1930’s, the governments of Argentina have lopped off 22 zeros from
the Argentine peso, and still, life goes on in Argentina.
Besides promising Welfare – though
not actually keeping their promises – the “Élite”
have wisely incorporated Entertainment for the masses into their
scheme for control. This policy of entertainment is vast in scope, from Sport
on through Pornography and incorporating War. Notice the
importance given to the “Olympic Games”. The “Élite”
regards war as simply an extreme form of sport for those directly engaged in
it, and as entertainment or “distraction” for those who watch it
on TV. (Witness the popularity of films about WW II.) The victims –
both soldiers and civilians - are simply expendable human material. Under
“War” we have to include the mind-controlling psywar
waged against the Élite’s own peoples by hammering continual
warnings of dire threats from abroad and by breaking down all sense of rights
vested in the individual, with the “fight against Terrorism” as
the excuse, for the time being.
We have to include
“elections” under the category of entertainment. Just like
professional basketball, baseball and football, elections are enormously
entertaining; they attract the attention of huge masses of people without any
significant effect upon reality. All over the world, elections are constantly
approaching or in process; all very entertaining. The entertaining bloody
fights of hooligans between winners and losers in sports serve to discharge
latent social frustrations. Riots against “electoral fraud” are
nothing more than childish tantrums in the eyes of the Élite and also
vent latent frustrations.
If we understand the point of view of
the “Élite” we can understand what will necessarily take
place in the world. It has to take place, because there is no other means by
which the “Élite” can retain their power in the world than
by the application of the Matrix that supports their rule: Democracy,
the Welfare State, Fiat Money, Entertainment and the Control of Knowledge.
What will necessarily take place –
barring a nuclear war which will overthrow the present Élite - will
certainly not be the disappearance of the Welfare State and a return to real
money, but quite the contrary: the Welfare State will be expanded to its full
expression, the Socialist State; fiat money will be supplemented with ration
tickets: there are already 46.5 million Americans on the SNAP program (Supplemental
Nutritional Assistance Program) a modern version of food-ration tickets.
The Socialist State – think of dingy, mediocre post-war Britain - will
minimize the market and fiat money will play a reduced part in the life of
people. In this regard, notice the war on cash, with restrictions
increasingly applied to the use of cash, first in Italy and now in Spain.
Personal cash deposits to bank accounts in Mexico, in excess of a monthly
limit, are taxed. Capital controls will crack down on international money
transfers. Everywhere, the use of credit or debt
cards will be encouraged, in order to leave paper trails. Nikita Khrushchev
was only partially right when he prophesied “We will bury you!”
for it was not the U.S.S.R. that was to bury the West, it was the
Élite of the West.
Prior to the coming of the Internet,
which has swept up the attention of the world, the world experienced a
similar revolution in information with the invention of the printing press in
the 15th Century. However, we must note a significant difference between the
printing press revolution and the Internet. The printing press disseminated
an idea that came to light in the Renaissance and that caught the imagination
of Europe: the idea of the rights of the individual, in turn based on the
fundamental concept of freedom of thought. This is turn, later spawned the
idea that governments should find their legitimacy in the approval of the
mass of free-thinking individuals – the repudiation of the medieval
idea of the King’s God-given right to rule. Authority was to come from below,
from the approval of the mass of individual voters, and not from above,
as did the authority of Kings. The idea of freedom of thought also affected
the authority of the Catholic Church’s Pope, because the Protestants
affirmed that each man should receive his spiritual guidance directly from
the Bible, which before the printing press was inaccessible to the
population.
* * *
At this point, an excursion into a
consideration of “looking Above and looking Below”:
In a fascinating 1959 book, “The
Sleepwalkers”, Arthur Koestler pointed out a change that came over
humanity approximately around the year 1600. At about that time, the thinkers
of humanity changed their outlook on the material world; they ceased to
regard it from the point of view of looking upward to causes Above
phenomena, and they began to seek causes Below phenomena, beneath the
physical events observed. The consideration of Quality in phenomena
was increasingly displaced by the observation of Quantity. Thus inferior
phenomena were supposed to determine phenomena of a superior nature.
Physics has pursued substance downward to such an extent that today it can
only speak in mathematical formulas.
This change in the point of view of
thinkers – from looking Above to looking Below - has its parallels in all
realms of modern thought. We see it in the dethroning of Kings, whose
authority derived from their quality, and the installation of Democracy,
whose authority derives from the quantity of votes. We see it in the
repudiation of real money of quality, and the adoption of numeric fiat money
of no quality whatsoever and which is only defined by its quantity. We see it
again in the birth of Positivism, which banishes quality and holds that all
knowledge must be based on measurable quantities. And we see it again, in
Sociology and Economics, which look to quantify and to elaborate statistics.
In Economics particularly, the change of
emphasis from Quality (Above) to Quantity (Below) is reflected in the general
disregard for the Austrian School of Economics, which has as its starting
point the fact that humans choose at every instant of their waking lives, and
that choice necessarily implies a consciousness of Quality and comparison of
the qualities, and therefore the values of the things or actions chosen; this
is a starting point radically different from that of the prevailing
Economics, which looks Below, to a sterile elaboration and study of arbitrary
numbers - Quantities denoted by monetary data - and offers the mechanistic
illusion that human life can be improved by attention to numbers on the part
of rulers. Modern economics disregards a fundamental premise of computer
programming: “GIGO: Garbage in, garbage out”.
Modern economics adheres to the general
model of science in our day: to look for causes below the phenomena
observed. These causes are deemed to push the entities observed and
determine their motion. Modern science does not look for causes which pull
the entities observed, because this would entail the recognition of purpose in
the physical world, and all modern science has to be purposeless, that is to
say, empty of any objective, i.e., teleologically
neutral.
However, in the study of acting man
– which is theme of Austrian economics – the fact that humans do
choose implies that they do have purposes and are in fact pulled
toward the actions and things they choose. Because Austrian economics does
recognize this fact and derives all its study from it, it is realistic and
thus provides the knowledge of what economic policy is conducive to the
highest possible level of general prosperity.
Modern economics – Keynesianism
– studiously avoids regarding the purposes of individuals and strives
to push them into behaving the way that it judges as best: hence
“QE”. The classic Keynesian statement that “people are
saving too much” typifies its philosophy of ignoring causes above
social phenomena - the pull exerted by the choices of individuals -
and seeking to apply causes below, to push society to the ends
which they, the Keynesian economists, deem preferable.
* * *
A consequence of the printing press was
the upheaval of the French Revolution that changed the world by implementing
this new idea: Authority comes from below, not from above. This idea
ousted one Élite and installed another: Kings, Aristocracy and
Priesthood were swept away and Bankers ascended into the new Élite.
The top Bankers gained an important standing among the Élite because
they had, and have the money to purchase the consent of the voters.
The Internet has indeed been a massive
and surprising phenomenon. But has it introduced a new idea that has
captivated the imagination of mankind, as the printing press did? The
Internet overflows with criticism, the world’s complaints are heard far
and wide, but we have yet to see any new idea - spreading like wildfire -
that will change the way the world is governed. The idea that
“authority comes from below” appears unassailable. Until that
idea is superseded by another idea, the Internet poses no real danger to the
ruling Élite. Presidents and Prime Ministers may come and go; the
Élite will remain in charge. If banking systems are nationalized, they
will still be run by the Élite who operate at a supra-national level.
An Élite is a permanent fixture
of human society. The United States was founded by an Élite who
enjoyed the humane culture of English gentlemen of quality living in the
Colonies. A notable accident took place: the Élite of the United
States were inspired by benevolence toward the whole of the new
American nation which they founded. Their attitude of good will was expressed
in their elaboration of the Constitution of the United States.
The creation of the US was an accident
that changed the course of history. We shall not attempt to recite the
subsequent history of that accident; suffice it to say that from those
heights of benevolence, of good will to man, the Élite of the United
States – and under the leadership of the United States, the
Élite of most of the world – have now transformed into a clearly
malevolent Élite. The Constitution is now regarded as “a
goddamn piece of paper”, according to a statement attributed to a
recent President.
The US Constitution has been erased for
all practical purposes and a malevolent Élite rules most of the world
through the Matrix of Power.
An Élite there must always be:
its existence is in the nature of things. The objective for men of good will
must be to weaken the malevolent Élite by undermining their
Matrix of Power. The undermining of the Matrix must proceed by attacking the
Matrix at its weakest link: fiat money. Fiat money is the weakest link
because it naturally evolves into a chaos of hyperinflation and disappearance
of international cooperation which inflames massive discontent. Fiat money is
the element that enables the operation of the Matrix. The response of
the Élite to the inevitable consequences of fiat money is predictable:
they attribute economic – and cultural - deterioration to everything
but the proximate cause, fiat money. We see this going on before our eyes.
Within the Western Élite, fiat
money has placed men who are not qualified to wield power – the
moneylenders - in the most prominent places of power. Thus the worst men
determine the fate of civilization. The international bankers are calling the
shots. Under the gold standard Banking was an honorable profession, but
raised to the supreme power of ruling, Bankers have become corrupt.
The men of good will in all nations must
understand that the enemy of civilization is fiat money. The Internet can
help generate and spread this understanding. When conditions become
intolerable, the cry for real money may convince a part of the Élite
to change their stance and turn their backs on the fiat money bankers. This
is certainly a forlorn hope, but we have no other, unless we remember the
words of Jesus: “Ask, and it shall be given
you.”
In the midst of a dire economic
collapse, with a popular outcry for real money, the Welfare State may be
jettisoned. A new outlook of hope may be reborn. Personal charity may take
the place of the Welfare State, as it should. Humanity may be able to start
from scratch to rebuild prosperity. It is likely that such a drastic change
of outlook would require Dictatorship and jettisoning Democracy along with
fiat money. Aristotle, 2300 years ago, already noted that democracies are
regularly followed by dictatorships.
If fiat money is not abolished, will the
present wickedness ever end? Yes, it will end in the fall of industrial
civilization because our civilization, now in decline, cannot survive under a
fiat money system; nor can it survive under Socialism, because Socialism can
only consume Capital. However, it may take a century or more for mankind to
realize that industrial civilization is a thing of the past. Poverty will
mean starvation for millions; the world’s population will contract,
perhaps as fast as it rose since the Industrial Revolution. By 2300 we might
be back to one billion humans on Earth.
This decline would not appear to worry
the Élite; there are signs that lead us to think that they believe
that the population of the Earth has to be reduced, that the resources for
maintaining the present material conditions of mankind are insufficient and
that the lives of 7 billion humans are unsustainable, approaching the
“carrying capacity” of Earth.
When the population of the Earth has
declined to one billion, after some three centuries of starvation, disease
and war, the Élite will also be poorer but they will still be on
top, because the existence of an Élite is a fact of life.
However, this is not the end of the
story: there is no end to the story of human life. It has a fractal nature,
with infinite variations on themes, like the “Mandelbrot set” (see here). One ever-recurring theme is that some
men - the Élite – dominate for a time, eventually lose their
domination and then the way opens for the appearance of a new Élite.
There will always be an Élite
because, contrary to what has been stated as a “self-evident
truth”, all men are not created equal; “equality” is an
idea born of the impulse to ignore quality and fixate on quantity. The Élite
is made up of those who have special qualifications – mostly bad, in
our day – and of those whom Dame Fortune brings to power,
“creatures of circumstance”, as Napoleon described himself:
creatures of the fractal which is human life.
In the impoverished condition of mankind
which lies ahead and with the drastic decrease in the population of the
Earth, today’s technology will fade as Capital vanishes; technology
without Capital to apply it will become useless knowledge. The world will
become a larger and simpler place, with much empty space.
The decline of technology, forced by the
scarcity of Capital, will drastically weaken the control of the Élite.
The nations of today will melt into smaller nations which will not be willing
to accede to the world control of the present Élite. Independence and
Nationalism will be reborn in new forms. The world control exercised by
the present Élite will dissolve for lack of means to impose it. In
some regions, breathing spaces of some freedom may once again open for
humans. Gold and silver may once again be money - in some places. New
Élites will come to power, limited in geographical scope; some of them
probably dictatorial in nature.
The differences between dictatorship,
democracy and kingly rule are that the democratic governments claim to speak
for the people, kings claim to have divine approval of their rule, and
dictators may lay claim to be the executors of the popular will according to
some ideology; as examples we have Fidel Castro, Adolph Hitler, Mussolini and
Lenin; or dictators may simply seize power and retain it by silencing
opposition through brutal means; but most dictators govern by applying ad hoc
ideological claims, rigged elections and brutality simultaneously. Chairman
Mao said that “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
It is true that some dictators have been enlightened men who have had humane
views and have ruled wisely.
The present Élite are concerned
that a force exists which may unseat them: Islam. Islam has the faith –
perceived as fanaticism by the West – to revert the paradigm that has
shaped the world since the French Revolution: Islam affirms that Authority
comes from Above. Thus it is understandable that the Élite regard
Islam as their deadly enemy.
The concern of the Élite
regarding Islam is reinforced by the presence of a significant component of
Jews within the ranks of the Élite. A tenet of Judaism is that the
Jews, as God’s Chosen People, are promised world dominion by God. So
besides Islam, Judaism is another force which affirms “Authority from Above”,
where Jewish world-authority is to be exercised by divine mandate at some
future time.
As long as the world – including
nominally Islamic areas - accepts the idea that “Authority comes from
Below”, the future will essentially have to resemble the present,
because “Authority comes from Below” is the defining idea
regarding government in our time.
The political disturbances which have
roiled Iran seem to confirm that there is a segment of its population which
holds the idea that “Authority comes from Below”. Add to this
consideration the telling fact that the Iranian government uses fiat money,
necessary to purchase consent.
“Authority from Above” -
when it still existed 250 years ago - did not purchase consent; it demanded
consent and used real money of gold and silver. The world’s second
government established upon the premise of “Authority comes from
Below” – the Revolutionary Government of France in 1790 –
introduced a full fiat, paper money system for France, which caused a huge
collapse in short order. (The first government to claim that “Authority
comes from Below” was that of Oliver Cromwell of England, established
in 1649 and dissolved in 1660.)
Questions then arise: Will it ever be
possible for a new Élite to operate under the paradigm of “Authority
comes from Above”? And will it be able to rule without recourse to
lies, deceptions or fictions? We leave
the questions open.
The
Human Fractal
“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:
and there is no new thing under the sun.”
Ecclesiastes 1:9
|