Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
Cours Or & Argent
Dans la même rubrique

Precious Metals Mining Company Managers: Your Job Includes Defending Your Industry

IMG Auteur
Publié le 05 décembre 2013
750 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 3 minutes
( 5 votes, 4/5 ) , 3 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
3
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Or et Argent

24hGold - Precious Metals Mini...

Chris Powell, the Secretary/Treasurer of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) published a fascinating dispatch today.  A GATA supporter wrote to a silver mining company’s investor relations officer to complain about apparent indifference to manipulation of the monetary metals markets.  The response:

Thanks for your email. We share your frustration about the silver price. However, we don’t attempt to take action against the bullion bankers for manipulation because 1) it is primarily the responsibility of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, not the companies, to regulate these markets, so the companies would have to sue the bullion banks too; 2) manipulation is just too difficult to prove; 3) such a lawsuit would take many years and cost many millions of dollars with no certainty as to the outcome; and 4) every company invests its cash where it thinks it can create the biggest return to shareholders.

In our case, we think investing shareholder money in things we can control, such as growing our business and our profits, is of greater benefit to our shareholders than investing in things we cannot control, such as suing the bullion bankers and the CFTC, both of which have far more financial and human clout than we companies do. They would just outspend us and stall for time.

This response is understandable.  A single company can hardly stand against the interests of the Anglo-American hyper-levered fiat financial empire.  Nevertheless, the investor relations professional is strictly speaking as an officer at a single company.  It would be unwise to downplay the potential impact an alliance of companies could have.  If 50 companies across the industry contributed to a trade organization that actually worked both the legal and public relations fronts, much could be achieved.  But in order for this to happen, investor relations managers and the entire executive suite at mining firms need to stop thinking as if they only operate as individual companies.

It’s high time to create a new industry trade organization

For less than $50,000 GATA sued the Federal Reserve in a freedom-of-information case and won.  While that was not a market-manipulation case per se, Mr. Powell notes it “…demonstrated market manipulation and the monetary metals mining industry did nothing to publicize it and didn’t even complain about what was proved. And while $50,000 was a huge amount to little GATA, many mining companies could squeeze that much out of their tailings pile in a few days if they were so inclined.”

A small number of mining industry executives have the wisdom and testicular fortitude to support GATA.  The rest of the industry should be shamed for their indifference and, in some cases, fear of speaking out.  Shareholders should demand support of GATA and the creation of a new trade organization truly dedicated to advancing the interests of the entire precious metals mining industry.

The World Gold Council hardly lives up to the mission many industry participants envision.  Promotion of jewelry consumption and the creation of exchange traded products can be productive.  But the fact remains, investment demand must be the primary focus, and exchange traded products have considerable issues beyond the scope of this article.  In addition, the industry is in desperate need of a public relations focused organization that is willing to speak truth to power about rampant and fully documented manipulation.  Specific cases of manipulation are more difficult to prove in a court of law, but certainly the management and manipulation of the precious metals market can no longer be disproved.  We’re talking about documented United States public policy, with decades of official documents, transcripts, statutory laws, public statements by central bankers and on and on…  Anyone that argues the general policy of precious metals market manipulation as not being public policy demonstrates they have not reviewed these documents — or, they have an agenda.

The National Mining Association of America offers a good example of an organization that works not only in the political trenches, but with media as well.  But they are much more heavily geared towards coal and the general mineral extractive industries, not precious metals companies.  I don’t profess to have all the answers, but I do know the precious metals community would be wise to start thinking more as an industry, and not as companies acting alone.  For starters, GATA deserves far greater support and if you’re an industry executive that has managed to read this editorial up to this sentence, you know what your next action should be.  In the very least, support GATA.

<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :4 (5 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
Why Mr Dubin, really now.

You use argumentum ad hominem rather than dispute my comment.

I am not compensated for my comments and I no longer have the need to feed my ego.
Ergo a slight bit of anonymity has been determined to be in my best interests.

I present what I perceive to be factual or what I think should be considered.
I contend that if you can't effectively argue either side of the debate, you need to sit down, shut up and learn something.
I would argue that as some of us age, we feel a personal need to help younglings avoid the screw-ups we forced upon ourselves.
You see sir, each of us is directly responsible for our personal and financial status.
Information, data or whatever each wants to call perceptional inputs must be evaluated for relativity, accuracy and usefulness.

Surely sir, you couldn't have presented such a comment trending towards ridicule in hopes of silencing me. Now would you have?
------------------------
Over the years and on every board I served, I was selected because I always called it as I saw it.
I don't stroke egos. Not even my own.
Many have commented on my willingness (a few have called it eagerness) to be socially abrasive.
Business is business. If you want social, go to a wine tasting.

As to the narrow-mindedness, business is a highly competitive environment. With narrow profit margins, any and all affiliations MUST be evaluated on a cost/benefit basis. I volunteered my affiliation with the AMA. Is that still too narrow? How many industry group affiliations would it take to escape the "narrow-mindedness" label?
In the gold mining industry, the rapid rise of gold prices in USD resulted in horrific cases of malinvestment, speculative silliness and what I would term corporate gluttony. Now those decisions have come back as albatrosses hanging on the necks of those who gorged themselves on unfounded optimism.
The industry needs time to clean house, re-evaluate deposits, and divest as needed. From my observation, GATA wants rapid Au/Ag price inflation to return.
It continues to be my opinion that the Latin saying, "cui bono" must always be applied; be it GATA, bitcoins or the hot tip, "Artful Dodger" in the 4th race.

Now the premise of, "... let the market judge YOU in full." Which market are you referring to?
I'm not selling anything here. When I sell my products, the market judges my product and pays me in a timely manner. Does that qualify?
-----------
Let me leave you with one thought.
In a functioning capitalist system, even the lowly janitor has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders. Each employee must help maintain and/or increase the profit margin otherwise they will face eventual unemployment. The applicable terms are cost-containment and productivity. Fiduciary responsibility is almost a redundancy in itself.

Argumentum ad hominem. Really now.
Evaluer :   2  5Note :   -3
EmailPermalink
The fact that you don't post with your real name demonstrates much. You say you have over 40 years of on and off experience in the extractive industries. Great. Put your name behind your words and let the market judge YOU in full. Should you ever serve in an executive position elected by a board and accountable to shareholders, I suspect a great many shareholders would have a few words to say to your board were they to read your comments to me.

When you say things like "I am NOT paid to help competitors" in response to what I wrote, it only goes to show you are a narrow minded person.
Evaluer :   5  1Note :   4
EmailPermalink
Every participant in the market attempts to manipulate the market in their own best interests.
This has been obvious since the dawn of man.

It is also obvious that the majority of folks don't and won't accept the reality of investor ineptitude.
Personal failure MUST be someone else's fault.

Having been involved in extractive industries off and on over the past 4+ decades, I can say with absolute certainty that I have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders.
I am NOT paid to help competitors. I AM paid to maximize the profits of the company I either own or work for.

Any attempt to fight those who manipulate the markets is doomed to failure unless and until the government gets involved on the side of industry.
Usually this takes the form of price supports.

Coming back to investor ineptitude. If you know the game is rigged and you still play, don't whine like a little girl child when your baubles get redistributed.
You are NOT entitled to a profit. There is no such thing as a level playing field.
For winners to exist, there must be losers.
And the reason the big winners are so big is because there are so many losers who have exhibited the characteristics of lemmings.

The easiest way to win is be the contrarian. Buy wisely when everyone else is selling. Hold for months or years until the next buying mania starts getting out of control and then lock in profits.
You might wanna familiarize yourselves with DCA (dollar cost-averaging).

$2870 in attorney's fees for the GATA win in a FOIA claim against the Fed isn't much to brag about.

To the best of my knowledge, GATA has never helped my bottom line.
WGC conceivably has through its gold promotion efforts.
I will continue to pay my dues to the Alaska Miner's Association as the AMA acts in support of my interests.
It is my opinion that GATA is just another Don Quixote begging for support so it can continue to attack another quintain.
And I contend that GATA preys on investor ineptitude.
The average investor (gambler) is crippled by fear of failure and fear is a powerful motivator.
Believe as you will, support GATA through your donations and you will probably continue to get what you already got.
I will opt for a cheeseburger instead.
Evaluer :   1  6Note :   -5
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
Why Mr Dubin, really now. You use argumentum ad hominem rather than dispute my comment. I am not compensated for my comments and I no longer have the need to feed my ego. Ergo a slight bit of anonymity has been determined to be in my best interests.  Lire la suite
overtheedge - 06/12/2013 à 21:47 GMT
Note :  2  5
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX
Profitez de la hausse des actions aurifères
  • Inscrivez-vous à notre market briefing minier
    hebdomadaire
  • Recevez nos rapports sur les sociétés qui nous semblent
    présenter les meilleurs potentiels
  • Abonnement GRATUIT, aucune sollicitation
  • Offre limitée, inscrivez-vous maintenant !
Accédez directement au site.