|
|
(When we talk about “honest
money,” most of us have in mind a currency that can be freely exchanged
for gold. In the essay below, Steven George Fair, a frequent contributor to
the Rick’s Picks forum, explains why
the choice of what we deem money is fraught with concerns about the very
nature of liberty, and about our willingness to order our economic lives with
money that has been imposed on us by feudal overlords. Ralph Waldo Emerson
once wrote that “A man is usually more careful of his money than he is
of his principles.” And therein lies the
problem, even for those who would attempt to make a fresh start with
bullion-backed money. Ultimately, it’s not the backing that is crucial,
but the freedom for individuals to decide for themselves what is acceptable
as money. RA)
There is sage wisdom in the study of
history. Historically, the same arguments that are raging today in
regard to economics, government, and Nature are the same arguments that have
always raged. The only change is the players, and no real change occurs
in us because, after all we are men and women, male and female, rib of my
rib. Culturally there are those tribal cultures that base wealth on time to
eat, laugh, play, and enjoy family. And then there are the traders:
those that stretch out to gather more than is needed to sustain happiness,
seeking obsessive control.
I’ll focus on the
traders. Each generation thinks they are different, and superficially
they are — in the way they wear their hair, pierce their bodies, or
color their skin. Beyond the superficial new way of being, we are the
products of where we come from, or where we think we come from. Our generational
arguments are based in belief in Creation by positive act of a superior
being, or by creative cosmic winds, dusts, and sludge. When born a
child has natural instincts that prevent it from
crawling off a cliff, tell it how to suckle, cause it to recoil from pain,
and find comfort in the motherly touch. Additionally, one child will fight, another will just lie there and take it. I
now have a basis to establish why reality is not reality when it comes to
history, fact, and the nature of men. Why do persons in markets,
governments, and social groups reject what is, and cling to what was not in
regard to money?
Puka Shells
The history of money is well
documented. A better source of information is the book Pieces of
Eight by Dr. Edwin Vieira PhD, who also wrote the treatise for the Act of
1985 on specie Coin money for Congress. Yet, there is someone who will
argue about precious metals as money, or puka
shells as money. There are those who will argue about Coin in the
control of the People, and money in the control of government, or an
individual. Knowing the theory upon which one bases
their opinion is not much thought about today. So, when I write about
democracy versus a republic, a child graduating from high school has no basis
in education to understand because he was taught in public school that a
democracy is what we have, and it must be the same as a republic which is in
the constitution. Then we have the democratic-republic, or
Judeo-Christian oxymoronic primal morass of goo. Today there are dialectic truths.
It is true that the money in use is
executive out of the control of persons, who may advise the executive via
democratic means. It is likewise true that specie Coin is valued by the
legislative branch under the Authority of the Sovereign in Common. It
is true that specie Coin has a value based in labor. It is also true
that fiat has a basis in general and paramount lien under the Banking Act of
1913. It is absolutely true that one may use Coin to extinguish, and
one may use fiat to discharge. Underlying all of that is the question
of voluntary ‘use’, and involuntary ‘use’, and what
it means. What does time, space, and plane
mean? In 1776, there was an ongoing argument between two dialect
realities. The reality between a feudal scheme, and Life, Liberty, and
the Pursuit of Happiness. Happiness won a limited battle that did not
eliminate those who would have kings over them. The dialectic between
those who will raise kings over them and those who will live sovereign by
Authority of the Sovereign has raged for over 5000 years. Those who
thrive on saying these represent “choice”
only give the choice to follow them democratically. Where is society today in
relation to choice, and to the battle between Sovereigns in Common, and
subjects enfranchised to the petty gods?
Out of Control
The stock market,
the bond market, the currency market all reflect dialectic reality in
that there are many truths. It is only when the dialectics are
attempted to be fused, or are in fact fused, that things get out of control.
The condition of being out-of-control defines where society is today. A
trader in fiat and democracy tries to infuse specie Coin money into his
equation under a feudal Lord. The anarchist in democracy, not wanting
personal responsibility, tries to imagine his is a republic instead of mobocracy under the control of the king within feudalism.
And then, we have republicans failing to teach their most prized possession,
children, sending them off to propaganda tolerance in Brahman Dharma
religious schools of the federal government. It is true that the
federal government runs all public schools via the purse. And, it is
true that the several States, and ultimately the parent, are required to
teach children the reality of the founding of this Republic, and its
money. Each parent is responsible to the child to teach that Bernanke
is a fraud, a criminal, and immoral under the Law of the Nation, and several
States. It is true that there are Sovereigns in Common, and it is true
there are corporate enfranchisees created
legislatively by the abuses of the legislative branch. The word
“Peer” means what? And if one’s peer does not judge
him, how can there be justice in the reality of dialectics? Democracy
does not like black, and/or white because it prevents propaganda from working
saying that a legislatively created corporate enfranchisee
person is the same as a Person created by the Creator. (review
Article IV, and the 14th voluntary political act to study Person versus
person, Superior and inferior). Mulatto is the goal of mobocracy
– and public education; everything identical and the same, the primal
goo the primal norm.
The arguments that precious metals
are not the Coin base for the Republic under
the control of the People via their legislative body are simple hog
swill. This is contract Law under the Original Contract
Constitution. The dialectic of money for the several States, versus the
territories, military reservations, guano-islands, dock-yards, magazines, and
the District of Columbia is where imperfect thinking takes logic to the
swirling mass of primal cosmic goo. A democratic-republic is swine
feces. Anyone crying about the manipulation of the markets, and speaking
about the Republic, honesty, morality, fair trade, Coin, and Separation of Powers
Doctrine has failed dialectic reality.
I, Rancher
Money can be private by contract,
just as there is private law by agreement. Money belongs to the people
via their legislative body, and violation of the trust is punishable by death
for embasement, and forced loans. Money belongs to
the Crown in a feudal scheme. Under the Magna Carta,
money was taken back to the legislative branch of a quasi-monarchy, the king
beheaded along with Thomas, Earl of Strafford. Trading
‘futures’ belongs to the feudal scheme, the lord Obama allowing
an inferior to enslave those below him. I, rancher, have a hundred head
of cattle. But I, trader, control a thousand ranchers, and 100,000 head
of cattle, via the Chicago trading pit. Some persons want to control.
Others just wish to be warm, fed, loved, and left alone. Contract, and
dialectic realities in regard to what money is, is fact. Money is
anything persons contract to say it is, whether cow
hides, tally sticks, or fiat paper. Quite another thing is specie Coin
in its real value over the span of 5000 years as the base contract for the
United States of America under a Superior Sovereign in Common, and a highly
limited governmental republic. #44 Obama, #43, #42, #41, #40, #39 et al.
operate under a unilatarian theory that the
Commander in Chief is the Creator/Master/ Lord over everything, subject to no
law, treaty, protocol, agreement, or constitution. One either supports the reality, and is the problem, or; one
disenfranchises and peacefully subsists by Right, every ready in defense.
History, the history of money, the
history of men, the same old arguments, the same old needs. Truth is
not black and white. Dialectically there are many truths about
government, about law, about natural forces. In Our Republic silver Specie
Coin is the money by contract for the several States and Sovereigns in
Common. In Our Republic the People are the Superior, the government the
inferior. These things I speak of about ‘the truth’ in the
Republic are black and white even if the reality about money globally is a
dialectic based upon the core differences between those who wish to be free
and moral, and those who wish to control everything as a lord. The
truth is that most want all of the benefits of an immoral economic power, but
none of the responsibility of facing the facts, and
paying the fiddler. Most arguments are wisps-in-the-wind because
they are confounded by dialectics instead of contract. You simply will
not be able to understand because you do not know who you are, where you are,
what your law is, and what your money is by contact.
Magic Elixir
How do I know this dialectic reality?
Through the trade of futures, and the crying about going back to honest
money as some magic elixir that will fix the rebellion of the people, and
their representatives who live in moral corruption, and giving away of Rights
by assent to legalese in violation of the law. The system works by
enslaving first the rancher, then the worker, then all Americans via the
Banking Act of 1913, then the South American, then the Japanese, then Chinese
who are a whole bunch smarter in regard to the overlord over extending
himself in foreign affairs. Better study the history of empires
starting with the U.S., the British, Portuguese, Indian, all the way back to why
the Roman Empire failed with its executive phony money and mercenaries.
Now work to bring all thoughts
together into this common arena. People are the problem in dialectic
abuses based in organic differences at birth. I am a sculptor who can see
perfection in a rough block of nothing. You will never be. Weave that
reality into the study of economics and trading markets — and into
Bernanke-speak, which I cannot fathom, and never will be able to fathom.
Rick Ackerman
Subscribe to Rick’s Pick
Rick Ackerman is the editor of Rick’s Picks, a
daily trading newsletter and intraday advisory packed with detailed
strategies, fresh ideas and plain old horse sense. Access to it and to all other Rick’s Picks services
is available via a free seven day trial subscription available by clicking here.
|
|
