I wrote what I thought was a fairly simple article for Forbes on Tuesday. I noticed that some people
really got it, and they were very excited. However, others were skeptical or
asking questions that went into the weeds. The former tells me that I said
something important, but the latter says that I said it in a way that not
everyone could relate to.
I started with the observation that many people argue (vehemently) that
money should be defined as the medium of exchange. In the US, the dollar is
used to purchase everything. Therefore the dollar circulates as the medium of
exchange. Therefore the dollar is money. Q.E.D.
The catch is that the dollar only circulates because the government forces
it to circulate, and forces gold not to. This means that the very concept of
money is under the control of the government.
Ayn Rand noted that force is not essentially about a physical push, or a
bullet hitting flesh. She said, “Force and mind are opposites…” She added,
“To force a man to drop his own mind and to accept your will as a substitute,
with a gun in place of a syllogism, with terror in place of proof, and death
as the final argument—is to attempt to exist in defiance of reality.”
She showed that force is an attack on the mind. Literally, the gun takes
away your ability to see reality clearly and use logic to arrive at the best
possible outcome. Instead, you must think and do as you are told. The
insidious process she described is at work with the concept of money. The
very concept of money has been perverted.
In most cases, people can see that government has no power to change
reality, or alter the laws of physics. But in this case—by the leverage of a
broken concept—many people assume that government has indeed the power to
make concepts into what it wishes.
George Orwell once wrote about this.
Debt paper is not money, no matter who issues it. The government has no
power to transform water into wine, or debt paper into money. I don’t think
anyone is explicitly arguing that it has this power. I think their error is
to gloss over why the dollar circulates, and just insist that, “well, it
circulates therefore it is money.”
Thus, the government is granted the power to turn paper into gold, though
the mind skitters away from openly admitting this conclusion.
The consequence to accepting the dollar as money is to think that gold goes
up. As I often say, in reality, gold is going nowhere. It’s the dollar
that is going down. But if the dollar is money, then the prices of all things
are measured in dollars. And so, we think gold goes up. Because that’s the
only way to frame it if the dollar is money.
If gold goes up, then one has made a profit. That’s right, one makes
money for doing nothing, just holding a lump of metal. Where does such a
free lunch come from? No time to explore that contradiction today. Let’s stay
focused.
It may not be fair, but we have a capital gains tax that applies when an
investment, commodity, or asset goes up. If you buy something for $1,000 and
sell it for $1,500, then you have a $500 profit. You must pay tax on that
income. There are no exceptions that I am aware of: antique Ferraris, stocks,
bonds, bitcoin, copper, houses, etc.
And this is where the concept of money gets real.
The government has several ways of forcing gold not to circulate, of
making us use their debt paper as if it were money. One of them is the
capital gains tax on gold. You see, if you barter—remember, gold is not
money, just a commodity—gold for a car then the government considers that to
be a sale of gold at the current market price. If that is higher than what
you paid when you bought, then you owe capital gains tax.
This tax makes it far too expensive to use gold in transactions, not to
mention the ledger you would have to keep. So gold is forced out of
circulation (and into private hoards). Gold is for holding, not for using as
money.
I have been arguing that this bad tax provision ought to be repealed. And
that’s the crux of the problem.
Am I just a crony, like every other crony, asking the government for a
special favor and preferential treatment? Is the whole point of repealing the
tax on gold so that gold speculators can make more money on their
gold trades?
This was essentially the allegation of one Arizona legislator, who asked
why gold should be treated differently than other investments.
If the dollar is money, then there is no good answer to this question.
To advocate for special privileges that benefit one’s own purse is to
fight for cronyism (also known by its older name, fascism). This is not a
principled position. Nor is it a sympathetic one. Everyone has a mental
picture of a fat cats, seeking to engorge himself as public expense. Once
we’re into that box, once we’re perceived that way, we’re doomed. No matter
what “blah blah blah” comes out of our mouths, it will be seen as
self-serving and hypocritical. And rightfully so.
Huh? Rightfully so?!? Yes. If we concede that the dollar is money, gold is
a commodity, and if we concede that gold is going up, which means we make a
profit, and if we demand not to be taxed on that profit, then we are no
different than any other special interest group seeking favoritism. We are no
different than any other rent seekers.
What is a principled free marketer to do? Well, if you cling to the notion
that the dollar is money, then you are disarmed. You have to concede that
gold should be taxed just like other assets. You can lobby to eliminate all
capital gains tax, but that’s about it. Good luck with that. I will cheer
you, but don’t expect victory any time soon.
I remind you of two things. One, tax keeps gold from circulating. In other
words, the gold tax is the key to socialized money. We can never have a free
market in money if gold is penalized with a tax every time the dollar loses
value. Two, as Ayn Rand showed, the moral is the practical. Your belief in
this bad definition of money is what keeps you from effectively fighting for
a free market in money.
There is much more to say about the topic of money and credit, to support
the case that gold is money. In this article, I just wanted to focus on this
one issue, because I think the error is an important one. I expect gold’s
enemies, as they begin to mobilize and organize, will be cunning enough to
see the vulnerability and go for the jugular.
If we want to win, we will need to be armed properly for the fight. This
is a battle for ideas, and the most important weapons we can wield are
concepts. Preferably razor sharp concepts. Let’s get it right, starting with
a clear understanding of the dollar and of gold.
